Outlook: Fuzzy on tube privatisation
Wednesday 19 August 1998
Undaunted, the Deputy Prime Minister, John Prescott, assures us that the taxpayer is not about to be fleeced by armies of merchant banks, accountants, lawyers and spin doctors. It is mere coincidence that they make up a good third of those 100-odd organisations who have expressed an interest in taking part in the Tube sell-off.
Mr Prescott also assures us that this is not a sell-off. This is a Public Private Partnership. The difference apparently is that the assets remain in public ownership. The private sector then borrows them, spends pounds 10bn on upgrading and maintenance, and then leases them back to London Underground, or rather something called Transport for London. This is the executive arm of the Greater London Authority which will be responsible for executing transport policy for the new Mayor of London (provided it is not one K Livingstone).
Clear so far? The picture is fuzzy, deliberately so perhaps, for Mr Prescott has not yet even decided whether the shooting match should be handed over lock, stock and barrel to one infrastructure company or whether it should be split among three.
Yesterday's "Market Sounding Paper" is also oddly vague on exactly how the private sector should charge for its services, other than explaining that charges will be based on the number of trains that run, the condition in which they arrive at the station and what sort of "ambience" they create for Tube travellers, whatever that may be.
Given the experience of British Rail privatisation, it is hardly a foregone conclusion that private sector involvement will equate automatically to improved services. Even so, the private sector would be hard pressed to be any worse than the existing public sector managers who, for instance, spend pounds 46m a year maintaining the Northern Line only for the result to be misery. What is certain is that since responsibility for running the trains and setting fares will remain with the public sector, then the Tube will continue to require a massive subvention from the taxpayer to enable Mr Prescott's partners to achieve private sector-style returns.
- 1 Notting Hill Carnival: Woman shares selfie after being ‘punched in face for telling man to stop groping her’
- 2 Keira Knightley topless: Usually conservative actress does own take on #Freethenipple campaign for Interview Magazine
- 3 Daily Show's Jon Stewart destroys Fox News for its Ferguson coverage
- 4 When elitism grips the top of British society to this extent, there is only one answer: abolish private schools
- 5 Terror threat level raised to severe as PM warns Isis risk could last for decades
Keira Knightley topless: Usually conservative actress does own take on #Freethenipple campaign for Interview Magazine
YouTube video posted by Isis militants shows 'execution of 250 Syrian soldiers'
Botched ice bucket challenge leaves man critically injured after plane drops hundreds of gallons of water
Terror threat level raised to severe as PM warns Isis risk could last for decades
Isis 'A Message in Blood' video shows beheading of Kurdish man in Iraq
Robin Williams Emmys tribute led by Billy Crystal criticised for including 'racist' joke about Muslim woman
The Rotherham child abuse scandal is a tale of apologists, misogyny and double standards
Scottish independence TV debate: Pumped-up Alex Salmond bounces back in bruising second round against Alistair Darling
Do you realise just how foolish the UK looks?
Ukip Douglas Carswell defection: Tory MP jumps ship to join Nigel Farage
When elitism grips the top of British society to this extent, there is only one answer: abolish private schools
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Money & Business
£50000 - £80000 per annum + benefits+bonus+package: Harrington Starr: Data Sci...
£450 - £500 per day: Orgtel: SAS Business Analyst, London, Banking, Credit Ris...
£32000 - £38000 Per Annum Bonus, Life Insurance + Other Benefits: Clearwater P...
£200 - £250 per day + competitive: Orgtel: KYC Analyst, Key Banking Client, Bi...