Outlook: Labour should leave company law alone
Thursday 29 January 1998
It is bad enough trying to pin down what makes for good corporate governance and even harder attempting to devise standards of best practice for boardrooms to live up to. Thus, Sir Ronnie Hampel, chairman of the eponymous committee, got it in the neck from both sides yesterday, the corporate governance fascists who felt he had not gone nearly far enough and the vested interests of big business for whom even the nomination of a lead independent non- executive is a step too far down the slippery road to prescription. The language of the final report may be more muscular here and there, the odd word dropped in which, though not prescriptive, leaves directors and shareholders in no doubt where Hampel thinks their responsibilities lie. But it was never going to be a box-tickers' charter and so it has proved.
Whereas Cadbury was born out of a series of high-profile corporate failures and Greenbury out of the fat-cat excesses of the privatised utilities, Hampel never had quite the same reference point to give its deliberations some proper context. As a result, the idea got about that Sir Ronnie was all set to water down his predecessors' recommendations.
As it transpires, he has not done so. Neither, however, has he broken new ground other than in requiring an increased level of disclosure of the internal workings on the nation's boardrooms.
Until yesterday, it seemed that this approach also suited the Government, Labour having discovered that corporate profligacy was a good stick with which to beat the Tories while in opposition but not much use as a prop now that it is in office.
Margaret Beckett, the President of the Board of Trade, appears to have pulled a flanker, however. She is simultaneously supporting the voluntary, best-practice approach advocated by Sir Ronnie while launching a large review of company law which may well result in the DTI legislating all over Hampel's patch.
Mrs Beckett is welcome to tidy up some of the loose ends of company law. But if the urge comes on to legislate in the boardroom, she should take a leaf out of Sir Clive's book and lie down in the sun until the feeling goes away.
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Rozanne Duncan: Ukip expels councillor for 'jaw-dropping' comments made in BBC TV interview
Sony hack: Angelina Jolie branded 'seriously out of her mind' in further embarrassing leaked email saga
Panic Saturday: 13 million Britons spend £1.2bn – while 13 million others across the country live in poverty unable to afford food
iJobs Money & Business
£43500 per annum + pension + holidays: The Jenrick Group: Night Shift Operatio...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000 + Car + Pension: SThree: SThree are a ...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £35K: SThree: We consistently strive to be the...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £35000: SThree: SThree are a global FTSE 250 b...