Thursday 25 February 1999
The irrelevance of it first. Unsurprisingly, the MMC finds that a cartel does exist in sub-underwriting of the new issues market, and that this operates against the public interest, in that fees would be lower but for its existence. Nobody would disagree very much with that general observation.
However, since hardly anyone raises money in the new issues market any longer - to the contrary, the overwhelming trend is towards the redemption of equity capital - this doesn't seem terribly important.
Circumstances could change, of course, and the new issues market might pick up again. But given the range of alternative markets now available to vendors, and companies seeking to raise more capital, the cartel's power is probably on the wane anyway.
In any case, it is not clear that the system of fixed commissions used in the City new issues market does in all cases operate against the public interest. Take the recent fiasco of an attempt to float William Hill, where an American style book building approach was adopted. Investors naturally moved to bid down the vendors as far as they could, forcing repeated cuts in the price. In a traditionally underwritten offer for sale, this could not have happened. The issue would by now have been away at the higher end of the range of expectations and it would also have been a success.
With rights issues too, it is by no means clear that the system operates against the interests of all clients. Very large companies would of course see a considerable fall in the costs of raising new capital if fixed commissions were abandoned, but for small and medium sized companies the effect would be the very reverse. This would indeed be perverse, given that to the extent that there is demand for fresh equity capital at present, it comes from smaller enterprises, not from big ones.
As it happens, the MMC has backed away from suggesting anything precipitous in terms of remedies. The worst it can come up with is that directors explain themselves to shareholders when they use the traditional underwriting cartel. It is hard to avoid looking at yesterday's MMC report without thinking - why did they bother?
- 1 Humans of New York image of crying gay teen receives best response yet from Ellen DeGeneres
- 2 What supermodels really think about posing in the nude
- 3 North Korean defector flees to Finland 'with evidence of chemical testing on humans'
- 5 Swedish minister gives strongest case yet on why EU should stop turning away asylum seekers
Humans of New York image of crying gay teen receives best response yet from Ellen DeGeneres
Greece debt crisis explainer: A history of just how the country landed itself in such a mess
North Korean defector flees to Finland 'with evidence of chemical testing on humans'
Swedish minister gives strongest case yet on why EU should stop turning away asylum seekers
Isis schoolgirl Amira Abase who fled London to join terrorists in Syria mocks victims of Tunisia massacre
More Britons believe that multiculturalism makes the country worse - not better, says poll
Nathan Collier: Montana man inspired by same-sex marriage ruling requests right to wed two wives
Greece crisis: IMF was pushed around by Angela Merkel and Nicholas Sarkozy – and now it is being humiliated
Forget little green men – aliens will look like humans, says Cambridge University evolution expert
Osborne to cap family benefits at £23,000 – announced ahead of his post-election Budget
Girl, 7, stares down hate preacher at Ohio festival with pro-LGBT rainbow flag gesture
iJobs Money & Business
£15000 - £17000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This company offers a range of ...
£15000 - £16000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Customer Service Advisors are r...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £45K: SThree: SThree were established in 1986....
£40000 - £60000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A Compliance Manager is require...