Education

Rain (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Bittersweet victory for Ruth Padel

The race for the Oxford Chair of Poetry had everything, from sex claims to allegations of character assassination. Emily Dugan reports

Ruth Padel (above) was supported by Poet Laureate Carol Ann Duffy after Derek Walcott withdrew

ap

Ruth Padel (above) was supported by Poet Laureate Carol Ann Duffy after Derek Walcott withdrew

"The problems of victory are more agreeable than those of defeat, but they are no less difficult". The words are Winston Churchill's, but last night they could just as easily have been uttered by the poet Ruth Padel, who learned, after a tempestuous week, that she had been elected Oxford University's new professor of poetry.

The win was bittersweet, coming as it did after Nobel Laureate Derek Walcott withdrew from the race last Tuesday mired by a smear campaign which alleged he had sexually harassed students while working in America in the Eighties and Nineties. Documents accusing 79-year-old Walcott were circulated at the university, forcing the poet to stand down to avoid embarrassment. In a statement, he said: "I am disappointed that such low tactics have been used and I do not want to get into a race for a post where it causes embarrassment to those who have chosen to support me or to myself. While I was happy to be put forward for the post, if it has degenerated into a low and degrading attempt at character assassination, I do not want to be part of it."

And so Padel faced competition only from the little-known Indian poet Arvind Mehrotra and won by 297 votes to Mehrotra's 129. There were also 51 spoilt ballot papers. These were attributed to a group of senior academics who yesterday attempted to halt the election altogether – saying that nominations should be reopened in light of the events surrounding Walcott. In an open letter, co-ordinated by Eloise Stonborough, secretary of Oxford University Poetry Society, they wrote: "Many other names might have been nominated for this post if Walcott had not been present in the race."

Despite the flurry of publicity, yesterday's turnout of voters was much lower than expected. Only 477 of the 150,000 eligible Oxford graduates and academics cast their vote – fewer than the 500 who voted in the low-key election of Christopher Ricks in 2004.

Padel said yesterday that she was "delighted", and that it was "a good moment, despite the shadows". But, she said, the scandal surrounding the contest had prompted her to consider standing down altogether. "I've been sullied by the suggestion that I had anything to do with this, which means nothing I do will be right now.

"But fortunately this is about five years, not just a moment."

The great-great-granddaughter of Charles Darwin, Padel is a keen conservationist and hopes to use the role to help further environmental causes.

The eminent professorship has been held by some of the most important literary figures of the last 300 years, including W H Auden, Seamus Heaney and Matthew Arnold. Second only in prestige to the Poet Laureacy, the post is worth £6,901 a year.

Ruth Padel's CV

1946 Born in the attic of her great aunt's house in London.

1965 Reads classics at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford.

1974-1984 Teaches Greek at Oxford University, Birkbeck College London, and Kings College Cambridge.

1985 'Alibi', her first pamphlet of poems is published.

1990 'Summer Snow', her first full collection of poems published.

1996-1999 writes a weekly column in The Independent on Sunday which analysed modern poems.

2004-2006 chair of the UK Poetry Society.

2009 Becomes University of Oxford Professor of Poetry.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

mission to the scientists?
[info]jaffgyp wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:28 am (UTC)
did i not hear ms padel on the radio saying that she wanted to take poetry to the oxford scientists?; i hope she hasn't got a touch of the missionaries re taking culture to the natives, but if she really has, in my experience she would be far better employed amongst today's barely educated and narrow minded eng lit graduates, leaving the scientists to follow their wide cultural interests just as they always have !
Perplexed
[info]johnm47 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 02:27 pm (UTC)
Why is this chair and who occupies it a news item in the first place? Would we hear the same about an appointment to an astro-physics chair or an engineering chair?
Re: Perplexed
[info]chilperic wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 05:54 pm (UTC)
The Chair of Poetry in Oxford has been a regular news item for decades, if not centuries, because, unlike any astro-physics chair or engineering chair, it is voted for by (potentially) 150000 people. That, particularly in these times when universities are turning their backs on democracy in a big way, makes it news. Even apart from the fact that that there are only two ways in which poets can be acknowledged in our society (this Chair and position of Poet Laureate) and there are plenty of chairs of astrophysics and engineering...
I do not want to be part of it." GO WHEN THE GOING IS GOOD
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:16 pm (UTC)
Documents accusing 79-year-old Walcott were circulated at the university, forcing the poet to stand down to avoid embarrassment. In a statement, he said: "I am disappointed that such low tactics have been used and I do not want to get into a race for a post where it causes embarrassment to those who have chosen to support me or to myself. While I was happy to be put forward for the post, if it has degenerated into a low and degrading attempt at character assassination, I do not want to be part of it."
I had read this before But what is he doing now?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla

Padel responsible for the bitter......
[info]squirrulfoot wrote:
Monday, 18 May 2009 at 08:45 am (UTC)
Padel's reasons for not standing down have tainted her: that she had no connection with the smearers yet their words should be considered; that her supporters said to stand firm, but she stayed silent when her nominator Grayling asked her to stand down. Her reasons clatter, but her aim for fame stays the same.


Most popular