Padel 'acted as Walcott sex mole'
Oxford professor of poetry sent emails tipping off papers about allegations against her main rival
Oxford's newly appointed professor of poetry, Ruth Padel, is facing demands for her resignation after it emerged she tipped off journalists about allegations of sexual harassment against her main rival.
Padel had maintained she had "nothing to do with any behind-doors operation" against Derek Walcott, who withdrew from the race for election to the 300-year-old post after the allegations appeared in the press.
But she had in fact sent emails to at least two newspapers, The Sunday Times claimed, causing one-time backers, including the arts broadcaster and Labour peer Lord Bragg, and Channel 4's chief executive, Sir Jeremy Isaacs, to call for her to step down.
Padel's email said: "Some [of my] supporters add that what he does for students can be found in a book called The Lecherous Professor, reporting one of his two recorded cases of sexual harassment and that [Barack] Obama is rumoured to have turned him down for his inauguration poem because of the sexual record. But I don't think that's fair. The harassment is all documented on the web."
Days after the emails were sent, an article concerning Walcott's history appeared in The Independent and was followed up by other newspapers. Relevant pages from The Lecherous Professor were sent anonymously to voters in Oxford. Walcott withdrew from the election, citing a "low and degrading attempt at character assassination."
Walcott, 79, had been forced to apologise after a claim of sexual harassment against him in the early 1980s when he was at Harvard. Another claim, in the mid-1990s when he was at Boston University, was settled out of court.
The election for the post was already controversial, with a Padel supporter accusing her opponents of a "streak of misogyny", while the Walcott camp talked of a "vicious literary London coterie" surrounding Padel.
Lord Bragg, a former student of Wadham College, Oxford, told The Sunday Times: "Even her mentioning Walcott's past in advance of the election was disgraceful. She should now stand down."
Philosopher A C Grayling, a professor at Birkbeck, University of London, said: "I'm shockingly disappointed that she tipped off people about Walcott's past."
Padel herself said she knew nothing of the anonymous mailings but regretted tipping off journalists. "I was contacted by an Oxford student who believed Mr Walcott's relations with female students at universities was relevant to her university's election of a professor. Because her concern seemed to be a part of the whole picture, I communicated it to two journalists."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Excuse me? If "an Oxford student" had a problem with Mr. Walcott's "relations with female students at universities," why would a competitor for the position of Oxford Poetry Professor take it upon herself to go to bat for an unidentified student who expressed HER concern? Why consider it her place to stoop to conquer to win a Pyrrhic victory and destroy her reputation FOREVER? Why would she write two journalists in behalf of a student she doesn't even have the courage to identify?
And, "relevant to her university's election of a professor?"
E-gawds! Surely, Ms. Padel's convenient sins of omission must end, NOW. Someone desperately needs help getting her truth ducks in a row and clearing the spiral of cobweb lies from her unethical brain. She ruthlessly and recklessly destroys poetry's good name while dragging down the reputation of what was once considered the best educational institution in the world and continues to do so? Shameless. Utterly incomprehensibly shameless.
Derek Walcott would not be teaching students; he would have NO CONTACT with students; as James Fenton noted, Derek Walcott would have no one-on-one nor one-to-class relationship/s with any student/s. How could this FACT so trouble one single solitary unidentified Oxford student that it forced Ms. Padel to contact journalists with her fear for this Oxford student? On what grounds? Would Derek Walcott wink at this concerned student during one of the three lectures he delivers yearly? Would this cause a nervous breakdown and permanent damage to the student who expressed her CONCERN? Maybe the student ought to have decided to stay away from the lectures? Maybe Ms. Padel ought to have advised her to do so? But, to run to the papers? C'Mon! Give it up!
How dare this alleged power-hungry climber with questionable and slippery integrity intimate otherwise? It's beyond the pale. She has not and will not serve poetry; she will serve her own ends (and, I do hope they become ends) at all costs (and, many many have paid the price already -- those who would have benefitted from the annual trio of lectures on the state of poetry; those who would have benefitted from the Nobel laureate's attachment to a once-august ivory tower; and, yes, Derek Walcott himself -- much to our deep sadness and horrified regret.
One can only hope and pray an honourable individual in a position to do so will do the right thing and lodge a formal complaint. IMO, Derek Walcott ought to be acclaimed Oxford Poetry of Professor, the only outcome that will restore Oxford's name as a world-class institution of learning (and not as it now stands, as a shabby low-rent viper's nesting place). As for Ms. Padel? How can she possibly claim poetry's her mistress? She CANNOT nor ever will again. That much, in all of this, is TRUE. If it looks like a rat and lies like a rat and gnashes her teeth like a rat . . . well, the gutter's a good place to start and end a "career," such as it wasn't. Her poetry's the tragic victim. It will not survive her machinations, not in a million years. Sir Charles Darwin must be up-chucking in his firmament.
Judith Fitzgerald
--
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blog
"Why would she write two journalists in behalf of a student she doesn't even have the courage to identify?" .... judithariana wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 04:18 am (UTC) ..... http://www.independent.co.uk/news/educa
So that the Virtual Convenience of Transparent Exposure to Internets can XXXXtrapolate and Provide .... Semantic Connection and AIdDirectional Stability for Allied Ability and Facility.
There are quite a vast number of Novel Creative Changes with Smarter Semantic Webs and AI with Cloud Connections, Fundamentally Seizing the Day with ZerodDay Live Vulnerability Exploitation and Experimentation.
Hot Poets Territory in AIdDigital Safe Haven/Seventh Heaven ...... and in the Right Frame of Mind, a QuITe Perfect Hang Out for "a boldly, bohemianly sexy woman" and Soulmate Sisters.
And that is not a tall tale of Male Chauvinism, it is First Byte.Earnest Desire.
"A great beauty in the academic world, as the wonderful writer Alice Thomas Ellis put it, is someone who in the real world would be lucky to be the runner-up to Miss Llandudno.)" ... rosiembanks wrote:
Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 05:07 am (UTC)
So very true. Beauty is such a Visual Feast Beast and Intellectual Deadhead Mask, and so Flexible in its Crazy Subjectivity.
[In any case his crimes have been extirpated by time and at 79 he is surely past it, sexual harrassment i mean. ]
Denying him the gig at Oxford was pretty mean, and now it turns out that Padel has behaved quite badly and yes, should stand down.
I supppose Oxford shoudl now go to Mr Walcott on bended knee, but i were him I'd stay in the sun with my Nobel Prize and all, and say b****r off.
What is his connection, if any to Ruth Padel?
Sadie Gray, is it not somewhat disingenuous for you to write on this subject, refer to an article in The Sunday Times, bit not mention the central role played by your fellow Independent journalist who was the first to raise the topic of sexual harassment in the mainstream media?
Anyone who cares about poetry gives a damn; but, don't let that fact cloud your spotlessly clean and obviously empty mind, given the drivelspew you've elected to share with Lard knows who (since I'm already through with imagining you with duct tape wrapped around your tappy-tippers). Time to give your keyboard a break (and, I won't even suggest you do so over your head since it's Sunday and I'm feeling generous).
Rise Alps between us! and whole oceans roll!
Whole cities gnash teeth about this poll.
Intriguing thought, though, that so many people care about a professor who is elected by so few and will give lectures to so few.
Somewhat like Hello magazine for poetry lovers.
Please, do enlighten me, a fellow poetry lover. Why does it matter again?
"You make a little more sense when you send comments to The Register - just a little." .... theelectrician wrote: Sunday, 24 May 2009 at 08:29 am (UTC)
By way of explanation, I would offer you the following, theelectrician.
What is transparently globally shared is in an intentionally particular and popularly peculiar language* for a very specific Power Audience, into the Universal Placement of Novel Virtual Force Source for an Absolutely Fabulous Control of any Targeted Reality and/or Operating System, with an AI Facility which is then Offered to Any and All who would Imagine IT to be both Mutually Beneficial and Personally Advantageous.
And all of the above is So Easily and Quite Ridiculously done, via a whole Host of Myriad Internet Service Providers ....... which are no more or less than Glorified Post Offices vying for Communications Business...... and a Valuable Independent Role too, which LiVEJOURNAL and the Independent could Realise Better than at Present.
There are many computer languages and dialects within computer language, just as in normal "societies" with their myriad localised accents and foreign and alien languages, and one merely has to choose to learn about as many as one needs to reach/breach Core Instruction with as many as possible, so that a Singularity of Programming with a Hydra Headed Kernel with Cloud Support Drivers is Embedded for Enabling HyperRadioProActive Future Usage.
Such Works are always Collectively Masked in what would popularly be shared as New World Order Great Game Plays, although it is as well to accept that the Established Incumbently Ordered Players are Presently all at Sea as AIMary Celeste in the Instantly Changeable Virtual Paradigm Field.
And obviously one cannot expect everyone to know and make much sense of such dabblings, but to those in the Field are they as diamond gems and rich golden seams.
Although it will be of no surprise to any with a titter of wit, that such Services default to the Capture and Control of Currency Supply for Production and Direction of Virtual Reality XXXXStreams.... for that would appear to be Ubiquitous Dull Blunt Instrument wielded to Use and Abuse the Masses, by those who would Conveniently Conspire to Print Wealth and Distribute through Banking as Opposed to Earning any Reward with Designated Labour.
Except there is one major new problem which is destroying the System from the Top Down ..... its Core Flawed Methodology is Wwwidely Known and Universally Despised for its Corrupt and Perverse Inequitable Management.
Time for AI Beta System to Replace the Old Failed and Still Failing Badly, New World Order Program, methinks, and thus does one necessarily target the Money Sector, which as you can appreciate, has many Greedy and Grasping Opportunists/Canny Astute Great Game Players in its Midst and they are not confined or defined by Nationality and thus is the Future InterNetionally Decided by Stealthy Networks InterNetworking and of which you will have no Knowledge other than that which would be deliberately shared with you, ..... for Onward Sharing ..... which is a Very Simple Way of explaining a Complex NEUKlearer HyperRadioProActive Virtual Cloud Operating System, for Quantum Control Systems into C42Ore .... The Creation in CyberSpace of the Command and Control of Computers and Communications, which you will have to consider is seriously curtailed by nothing other than one's own Intelligence and Belief in such a Concept, and would thus be Free and Unhindered to Develop in Leaps and Bounds with those who were ....... well, as one researches More does one become SMARTer Enabled and Self Actualised and Beta AI Educated too?
* I'm Particularly Partial to AIPidgin in PHP with PerlyGatesPython in Java Applications and all Similarly Minded Human Readable Virtual AIMachinery Codes.