Tories to raise entry requirements for teachers
A Conservative Government would make it harder to become a teacher by raising entry requirements for the profession, the party's education spokesman Michael Gove declared tonight.
In a keynote speech setting out the priorities for the first year of a Conservative Government, he said all would-be primary teachers would have to have at least grade B passes in maths and English - instead of C grade passes as at present.
In addition, those opting for a PGCE course following a degree would have to have at least a 2:2 pass - instead of any degree as at present.
Mr Gove told a seminar organised by the Centre for Policy Studies:that "the emphasis will be on high quality teaching."
He said he was impressed by the Finnish and Singapore education systems - which head international league tables - where only those with top level degree passes were allowed into the classroom.
Mr Gove's comments will raise concerns from teachers' leaders over whether there will be enough recruits - particularly in maths, traditionally a shortage subject - to fill vacancies.
However, the tough economic climate has seen a rise in applications to teaching courses - particularly from older recruits seeking a second career.
Mr Gove made it plain he would launch a "Teach Now" recruitment scheme - under which trainees would do more of their learning on the job, making the package more attractive to mature entrants who could earn a salary from the start of their training.
The toughening up of the teaching regulations was just one of a series of measures outlined in his speech tonight.
For the first time, he was more specific on what measures the Conservatives would take to improve discipline against a background, he said, of 300,000 youngsters a year being suspended from school.
Teachers, he said, should have a right to anonymity in cases of abuse allegations until a case came to court - a key demand of some teachers' unions.
In addition, they should not be suspended unless there was a prima face case that the allegation would lead to disciplinary proceedings or criminal action.
In addition, government advice that teachers were "strongly advised" not to stop and search pupils for knives, weapons or drugs if the pupil objected to being searched would be removed. Guidance on the action teachers could take to restrain unruly pupils would be strengthened.
A ban on putting pupils into detention until at least 24 hours after any incident would also be removed to make the sentence closer linked to the offence.
Health and safety guidance to schools would be reviewed, too. "The culture in which children are forced to wear safety goggles to play with conkers or use blue-tac must end, he said.
Mr Gove repeated pledges to make it easier for independent groups such as parent or faith groups to run state-supported schools along the model adopted by Sweden and to replace national curriculum tests for seven-year-olds by a short reading test which would enable all parents to know whether their child had been taught to read properly.Otherwise, his speech was more significant for its omissions than its inclusions. He failed to repeat the suggestion he had made earlier that tests for 11-year-olds should be trabsferred from primary schools to the first term at secondary school - to avoid too much coaching for the tests in the last year of primary school.
This is likely to lead him into confrontation with the National Union of Teachers and National Association of Head Teachers over their threat to boycott the tests. The NAHT, in particular, had seen it as "an interesting idea" to solve this dilemma.
Meanwhile, the Government yesterday paved the way for all youngsters to receive at least one year of compulsory lessons about sex and relationships before they leave school.They made the subject a compulsory part of the curriculum and lowered the age whereby parents could withdraw their children from sex education lessons from 19 to 15. Schools Secretary Ed Balls said a majority of parents polled had been in favour of the idea.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
I also welcome change to over-the-top health and safety measures, clean away socialist 'nanny state' rubbish.
FACT: The majority of adults over 40 were taught by teachers without a minimum 2:2 degree. We have moved to all-graduate entry and plans are in place to move towards a masters qualified profession; teaching is not standing still or recruiting 'below-standard' people. This policy move is concerned with reducing expenditure on teacher education rather than increasing teacher quality; as I said below if they really cared about teacher education they'd increase the length of time taken to qualify as a teacher rather than reduce it.
If you placed a 2:2 degree requirement alongside both grade B GCSE maths & English as a minimum requirement to become an MP Westminster would be half-empty.
1) the implication that higher qualified entrants will be better teachers; and
2) the increasing emphasis of on-the-job initial teacher training.
It is clearly important that teachers should know 'their stuff' and be appropriately qualified but to insist on the acquisition of particular 'bits of paper' is extremely mis-guided. As a teacher educator, I have met on many occasions, people who would have made excellent teachers (including having high-level subject knowledge) but who have not been through academia. We rule out so many potentially marvellous practitioners and, instead, we infer by this proposed legislation that qualifications equal good teachers. This is clearly nonsensical. Each applicant to initial teacher training should be examined on a case-by-case basis; considering enthusiasm, passion for working with young people, experience (eg. in leading workshops), all in addition to knowledge of their subject(s).
As to my second concern, I am impressed with many of the entrants to the teaching profession I meet and work with who are training on-the-job. Such training should continue to be available for those who are suitably experienced already in working with young people. However, for those who have limited experience, I do not believe there is any substitute for a standard teacher training course such as those provided at many of our Higher Education Instututes. Indeed, I would go as far as to say that these are currently too short rather than seeking ways to circumvent and accelerate training. There is more to teaching than can be gleaned simply through on-the-job practice (important and crucial though this undoubtedly is) with the pressures and complexity of school life constantly seeking to reduce professional development time and energy. For example, child psychology (frequently ignored at our peril in training courses), a knowledge of sociological issues, developing approaches to meet the multiple needs/abilities of young people, and time for true in-depth reflection to name but four aspects. These, and many others, are important and can often be glossed over when one is caught up in the frenetic life of a school and its quite natural demands.
It is time that someone in politics (of any 'colour') recognised that rigour and quality in the teaching profession is not solely about qualifications or getting potential teachers through the training as quickly as possible. It's about getting teachers in front of the children who are passionate about education and young people and who have some knowledge of what makes young people 'tick'.
from:
A teacher of nearly 30 years experience (and without a degree in my subject); now a teacher educator.
I have to admit there is SOME evidence that teacher competancy is realted to an amount of subject knowledge, but no evidence at all, which links teacher competancy with the classes of degree namely 1st, 2:1, 2:2, 3rd & pass degrees.
Quote: 'Mr Gove repeated pledges to make it easier for independent groups such as parent or faith groups to run state-supported schools'......Do the conservatives have any evidence that these groups are better at running schools than LEA's?
The conservatives have many 'beliefs' about initial teacher education but have no EVIDENCE to support and justify their new policies. I can see their arguments being used to justify and cloak their agenda of reducing expenditure rather than increasing in teacher quality; if they really cared about teacher education they'd increase the length of time taken to qualify as a teacher rather than reduce it.
John Clarke (Teacher Educator)
He was educated 'in the state and independent sectors' according to his web page; how long in the state sector I wonder.
Michael has been a journalist since he left university, working for local and national newspapers, radio and TV; this therefore makes him an education expert!
He has some very strange views on life.....see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celsiu
How does this idiot get to such a position of POTENTIAL power?