David Green: We should not cut university places

News in pictures
News in pictures
On Facebook
From the blogs

Asylum seekers: When the questions tell us so much more than the answers

For the last four years I've been paying my karmic dues (I would say "contributing to the big societ...

Thanks to The Sun, for enriching each of our lives

Those at the super-soaraway Sun are, yet again, making outlandish claims that they’ve changed the wo...

Ones to watch: Aiden Grimshaw to Hey Sholay

With so much new music coming out it’s difficult to keep track of what’s out there. It’s a lucky dip...

Banter Bigotry: It’s only a joke, love

Banter is a very odd thing. As an activity it provides a handy shelter for bigots to flex their ant...

It is absolutely right that in the current financial climate, universities should be asked to do more for less to help the country. Higher education has a crucial role to play in helping the UK climb out of recession, and it is not unreasonable to expect universities to take their fair share of spending cuts.

What is unreasonable is the sheer scale of the cuts facing the sector – amounting to some £500m next year in England – and the policy of freezing and even axing student places in the face of an unprecedented increase in demand.

Cutting expenditure by reducing the number of university places is an inefficient way to save public money and makes neither economic nor moral sense. Yet that is exactly what the Government has done, leading to a situation where at least 250,000 would-be students – many very well-qualified – will find the door to higher education closed this summer.

This is a real waste of potential. In the present economic circumstances, people who don't go to university have too few alternatives for getting on in life. In practice, shutting them out forces more people on to the dole.

Each place at university costs government just over £71 a week in student support payments. Job Seeker's Allowance is £51 a week. It's inefficient to deny people education and put them into idleness for the sake of £20 a week. There is a much better way of saving public money now.

Currently, former students owe a total of £25bn to the Government in student loans. This will increase by at least a further £5bn this summer when more students graduate. If the government introduced a voluntary early repayment scheme offering a discount of say 10 per cent, many millions – possibly even billions – of pounds of debt would be repaid within the next two years. This would dwarf any saving that can be made by cutting university funds, and the money could be used to pay for the extra places we need for this year's and next year's would-be students.

There is no incentive at all at the moment for graduates to repay their student loans any faster than is required. If you go to any impartial money advice site, they all say that the last debt you should pay off is your student loan because it is the cheapest. At present the interest rate is 0 per cent. Some of the older loans are actually being charged at minus 0.4 per cent. It's extraordinary.

If an early repayment discount system were introduced I believe that you would find many graduates who are now in work and saving hard would make their loan repayment a priority. In some families, relatives with savings would also chip in with a contribution towards their son's, daughter's, grandchild's student loans. Let's face it. Savers aren't getting much interest on their savings at present.

The alternative, ill-judged route to saving public money that the Government is taking will cause real damage to our higher education system and could result in many tens of thousands of prospective students being denied a chance to boost their career prospects. Even places to study nursing and midwifery are being cut this year!

It is directly opposed to what is happening in other countries, such as the USA, France and China, where they are choosing to invest more in universities as a way out of the economic crisis. In the USA, California State Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger led the way last year in imposing swingeing cuts on higher education. This year he has reversed this because he realised that business people want to invest in a state in which higher education is growing stronger not weaker, and which is "choosing universities over prisons," in his own words.

The worst effect of the cuts is not crumbling university buildings, lecturer job losses, or inferior research facilities – though these are undoubtedly bad. It is the cut and cap on student numbers enforced by the new system of fining universities £3,700 for each student they take above their quota.

This will lead to tens of thousands of young people becoming disillusioned and bitter at the moment when they have the chance to learn new skills and become productive citizens. Universities can do many things to help the country tackle the economic crisis. Right now, our number one contribution should be to educate more students, more effectively and efficiently. Let us do our job!

The writer is professor of economics and vice-chancellor of the University of Worcester

Independent Comment
blog comments powered by Disqus
Career Services

Day In a Page

'I may be deaf, but you can still talk to me'

'I may be deaf, but you can still talk to me'

Being a teenager is hard enough – for those with hearing loss, it can be even more complicated
A right royal trip down the river

A right royal trip down the river

A new exhibition celebrates the glory days of London's mighty Thames
The 10 Best lawn mowers

The 10 Best lawn mowers

From petrol-fuelled to self-propelled
Every second counts

Why does life appear to speed up as we get older?

Matilda Battersby finds out how the clock plays tricks with our minds
Couture on the Croisette: Fashion hits

Couture on the Croisette

The best outfits from the 2012 Cannes Film Festival
Child of the revolution: the Burmese family that democracy brought back together

Home of the free

The Burmese family that democracy brought back together
Cannes review: Canine accolade and Hitler's return are high spots amid the gloom

Cannes review

Frocks, canine accolade and Hitler's return
Robert Fisk: The going price of getting away with murder... would $33m be enough?

The going price of getting away with murder

Robert Fisk: The long view
Principled Skinner rises above the fray

Principled Skinner rises above the fray

Andy McSmith meets Dennis Skinner
Patrick Cockburn: I fear this terrible massacre will be the beginning of a long civil war in Syria

Patrick Cockburn

I fear this terrible massacre will be the beginning of a long civil war in Syria
Hardeep Singh Kohli: For me, it is all about 'Gregory's Girl', a record of first love

Hardeep Singh Kohli

For me, it is all about 'Gregory's Girl', a record of first love
Christian Louboutin: 'I don't think comfort equals happiness'

Christian Louboutin interview

'I don't think comfort equals happiness'
Happy birthday, Hotel Babylon!

Happy birthday, Hotel Babylon!

Hollywood's home to the A-list celebrates 100 years of discreet luxury
Rupert Cornwell: Low-rise capital could finally reach for the sky

Rupert Cornwell: Out of America

Low-rise capital could finally reach for the sky
The secret life of the red carpet

The secret life of the red carpet

As Cannes reaches its climax with the Palme d'Or and the celebrities gather in London for the Baftas tonight, Kate Youde and Jack Dean investigate the real star of the show