Understandably, perhaps, Michael Howard, the Tory spokesman on foreign affairs, was still asking for "clarity" from the Foreign Secretary but his backbenchers had decided to take a day off from scepticism about the war and indulge themselves in that most delicious of Tory recreations, Eurobashing. There were several questions about the reform of the European Commission and more than one of them settled on Romano Prodi as a very satisfactory new whipping boy. Julian Lewis was anxious that Eastern European countries that had only recently escaped the heavy grip of the Warsaw Pact would be lured into immediately surrendering their new liberties to another monolithic power bloc - that the Iron Curtain would fall only for the Red Tape Rampart to rise up. John Bercow put it in even bolder terms. Why couldn't the Government admit what is openly acknowledged in Europe, he demanded, before going on to out Mr Prodi as a "committed federast". Mr Prodi, it seems, has been sidling up to naive young democracies, offering them sweets and computer games if they will just go round to his place and let him remove their sovereignties.
In the Lords, hereditary peers opened the first day of three days of debate on the House of Lords Bill with an eleventh-hour conversion to the popular will. Only last week their noble Lordships demonstrated the true value of the hereditary principle by endorsing the incredible notion that the sexual desires of 16-year-olds are in some way susceptible to parliamentary legislation. Yesterday they confirmed their detachment from anything recognisable as the real world with a communal fantasy that their abolition was causing waves of unrest among the common folk. "The people don't want it," said Lord Strathclyde, and his wishful theme was taken up by Lord Campbell of Alloway, supporting an amendment that would call for a referendum on the Government's proposals.
"The people don't want to put to sea in a sieve with any old owl or pussycat," argued Lord Campbell - in one of the more lucid passages from a frankly baffling speech - and he concluded that the Government would press through its legislation against "the wishes of the people". But what people could he conceivably be talking about? Was he, perhaps, using the phrase as a public schoolboy of the Thirties might say "my people", to refer to his immediate family? Or did he have in mind the staff and beaters at his country house? Anybody, surely, but the people talked to by Mori not so long ago, 80 per cent of whom indicated their satisfaction at the imminent demise of the hereditary principle. It really is time to wake up and smell the Earl Grey, your Lordships.Reuse content