Media

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 16°C / Lo 8°C

Can an ex-civil servant finally persuade women to buy erotica?

Sex will be strictly cerebral in a new top-shelf magazine for 'thinking women', reports Jerome Taylor

Suraya Singh quit her job at an education quango to launch Filament, a quarterly erotica magazine developed specifically for women

SUSANNAH IRELAND

Suraya Singh quit her job at an education quango to launch Filament, a quarterly erotica magazine developed specifically for women

Suraya Singh used to have a mundane job working for an education quango. Like millions of women the 30-year-old would often spend her lunch breaks perusing the women's magazine section at a nearby newsstand.

There she became increasingly despondent at the celebrity gossip, diet tips and fashion advice she was bombarded with. What she wanted was a classy erotica magazine that women like her would be happy to buy. Men's magazines regularly mixed aspirational and intelligent content with high-brow erotica, but women, she felt, were being left out. Which is why she decided to quit her job and set up a magazine herself.

"There are an awful lot of stereotypes about who women are and what turns them on, which I don't think are true," she says. "If you're not some walking stereotype of a woman – who really speaks to you?"

Next week she will launch Filament, a self-funded quarterly erotica magazine that is squarely aimed at turning women on. A glitzy launch party complete with male acrobats is planned for Monday and an initial print run of 5,000 copies has just rolled off the presses.

Marketed as "the thinking woman's crumpet", the first issue features a semi-naked man in a praying position on its cover. Inside, artistic photoshoots of scantily clad male models are juxtaposed next to erotic short stories and erudite articles on off-beat topics such as the merits of being a geek. And if you tire of the sex, there's always a recipe for spicy celeriac bake to keep you busy.

Finding an erotic format that women will buy en masse remains a holy grail. Many publishers have tried to create female-friendly pornography – most have failed. The only comparable magazine on British newsstands is Scarlet, which was founded in November 2004 and is often described as "Cosmopolitan with even more sex".

Ms Singh believes other attempts to create successful female erotica have failed to take into account what women want. "Male pin–up style material that was marketed at women was often created based on wrong assumptions, or was merely repackaged from the gay market," she says. "If you want to turn women on, you have to be 100 per cent about women."

To illustrate her point Ms Singh pulls out a selection of magazines that tried, to varying degrees of success, to conquer the female sexual psyche. Two of the most successful are Play Girl, which printed its last issue in January after 32 years, and For Women – a 1980s attempt by the creators of Penthouse to do for women what it did so successfully for men.

Both magazines feature the sort of oiled, muscled Chippendale–esque models that have typified much of female erotica in the past and ultimately attracted almost as many gay men as straight women.

To find out what sort of models would truly appeal to a female audience, Ms Singh – a New Zealander with an Indian father who has been living in Britain for six years – set up an online community to ask as many women as possible what they would like to see in an erotic magazine. "The answers were very interesting," she says. "Although people like all sorts of things, the consensus was not for muscle-bound men. What they wanted were toned men with oval-shaped, often quite feminine faces."

All the models in the first issue were people Ms Singh approached in the street. "I just asked them whether they'd be prepared to take their clothes of for a new magazine," she laughs.

The first issue has avoided full-frontal nudity, but the Full Monty is not something Filament's editor will rule out. "When we did the shoots for the first issue some of the models did go all the way, but we didn't feel those photos worked," she says. "There's no point being explicit just for the sake of it. We're working on the second issue now and I think it will probably show quite a lot more."

The key now will be whether the magazine's formula really works. Laura Godman, deputy editor of Scarlet, says the female erotica market is there for the taking. "Over the past few years it's become so much more acceptable for women to admit that they enjoy erotica, whether it's magazines or 'fem-porn'," she says. "It's still a work in progress but people's opinions are changing."

But Rowan Pelling, the former editor of Erotic Review, believes creating erotica for women is notoriously difficult. "To my mind, there isn't really a vast difference between what men and women want," she says. "Good erotica will always appeal to both sexes regardless. I think it's very difficult to market specifically female erotica, but good luck to them."

The business of gender-bending specific

* Giving the seedy back-alley sex shop a friendly makeover was a work of commercial genius for the founders of Ann Summers, who now dominate the female sex shop market.

* Who says moisturisers are just for women? The male moisturiser industry has grown to such an extent that British men are the most enthusiastic male groomers in Europe – no doubt thanks in part to out-and-proud metrosexuals like David Beckham.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

No brainer for intellectuals
[info]floppsiefrog wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
Good luck to this wannabe entrepreneur of erotica, however, I wonder whether she's considered the futility of her ambition. First of all, the type of printed imagery that would make most healthy women feel randy is probably illegal and, secondly, those buying what she's proposing to peddle will be stigmatized as being either sniggering voyeurs, lonely losers or the equivalent of psychopathic sexual lepers.
Re: No brainer for intellectuals
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 01:13 pm (UTC)
Can you please point me in the direction of this type of printed imagery (or even better, put some web links in a comment)? Thank you.
Cerebral.
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 08:50 am (UTC)
"Sex will be strictly cerebral"? It always is, for the English.
women turned on at lunchtime
[info]laconico wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 09:35 am (UTC)
good news for afternoon office extra-marital action.
Bring it on
Female Erotica ?
[info]copstick wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 10:12 am (UTC)
The Erotic Review (yes, still going, launching its 100th issue in June) provides excellent erotica for and by women. We just don't discriminate. Our women - readers and writers - just revel in the erotic, it doesn't have to be 'specifically' for women. Society used to think women required their own carriages on trains ... Like boyfriend cardigans and dinner suits, quite often what is meant for men is even sexier on a woman. The Erotic Review is also, not many poeple know (yet), owned by a women. Who loves great writing about great sex. Which is what The Erotic Review is all about. With some seriously horny pictures and a lot of laughs. Sadly lacking in the celeriac bake department, tho' ...
Re: Female Erotica ?
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 06:53 am (UTC)
One must presume from your slightly incoherent advertisimo-comment that having a 'whip around' is your speciality, eh?
Yet Another Ugly Duckling Projects Fantasies into Print
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 10:14 am (UTC)
Suraya Singh? The last Punjabi girl I dated had probably never read any silly women's magazines yet she still knew how to excite and satisfy with consummate ease. I was so happy I almost started to wear a turban.

It's funny, but Mizzz Singh bears an amazing resemblance to how I would expect a plain-Jane sans orgasmic ability to look like. Maybe I'm missing something. I have this suspicion that this "just entered my neurotic 30s" Mizzz Singh has been sat in her London apartment watching a few too many pornographic DVDs with her out-of-shape lady friends. And as she is a 'gal' on civil servant pay living in London, one would have to suppose those porno DVDs were generally full of West Indian lotharios.

Someone once said that the only material things London produces these days are homosexuals and prostitutes. So, producing a rag-mag that sits somewhere between those two lifestyles might give Mizzz Singh the opportunity to pay her rent and buy those bottles of red wine she so badly needs.

Readers should note that for the past 35 years, 30-something wymyn like Singh have been popping up with regularity, all claiming that they know what women want. I don't know what women want, you don't know what women want, and neither do the women! Only Singh knows!

The only plus to come out of this non-story is the fact that an unnamed educational quango lost the presence of someone whose mental health is probably a little too disturbed for her to be allowed near children.

The gender-bendingly named Rowan Pelling, quoted above, is probably correct (as she often is). I would only differ with her in some of the details. One being the hugely cyclic nature of women's hormones prior to age 35 or 40, and another, the inconvenient fact that the female brain is "wired" differently, as recently proved by MRI scan images of male & females subjected to the same external stimuli. In the experiments, the female subjects typically attached about 30% to 40% more emotions (using emotional regions of the brain) than the male subjects to almost every thought.

By the way, does anyone have a recent photo of Ms. Pelling? If she looks as good as she (usually) sounds on these issues then she'll no doubt be a stunner. Grrrrhhhhh ... Get out your tape measure Ms. Rowan, as I'm a bit of a handful in the company of a pretty lady with a brain.
Re: Yet Another Ugly Duckling Projects Fantasies into Print
[info]synthclarion wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 11:06 am (UTC)
You really are quite a catch.

I don't see what the looks of anyone on the editorial staff have to do with the content of the magazine. Do you honestly think FHM, Nuts and Loaded are written by men anywhere near as comparatively attractive as the women featured in the magazines? Of course not. They're tubby, unpleasantly smelling mouthbreathers just like you, me and 90% of our gender. That doesn't stop them featuring uncharacteristically alluring eye candy in their publication, and regardless of what you think of Ms. Singh's looks it won't stop her featuring uncharacteristically alluring eye candy in hers.

If wanting to look at titillating pictures of attractive members of the gender of your choice is a sign of 'mental health' being 'a little too disturbed', then I would suggest that Britain's psychotherapists are missing a trick.
Re: Yet Another Ugly Duckling Projects Fantasies into Print
[info]starkhaven wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 12:24 pm (UTC)
& besides, I know Mizz Singh in person, & rest assured she is one hot mama
Errol!,......
[info]mowfalmighty wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 12:14 pm (UTC)
Yes errol888 |I think you had best slip off quietly to the gents and have a wank.
Yay!
[info]myriadofsins wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 12:27 pm (UTC)
Really looking forward to seeing what the first issue is like.
Already 24x7 sex in every form of media
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 12:45 pm (UTC)

There is more than enough sex being flaunted everywhere we look.
Just devalues stability of the family life.
Re: Already 24x7 sex in every form of media
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 06:55 am (UTC)
You might appreciate this thoughtful article, written by an ex-London Policeman now living in Denmark: http://www.rense.com/general86/kill2.htm
Re: Already 24x7 sex in every form of media
[info]corporeal4now wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)

Thanks. A very relevant article in the link. But we have to note that the situation we have today is not unique. There have been ancient civilisations where the communities went crazy on liberation but each time they were destroyed by God. But this time we hit the end-stops!
Mills and Boon...it is not
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 01:03 pm (UTC)
Rowan Pelling summed it up. A few lines couched in euphemism and diplomacy.....he expects them to be bust within the year. Romantic/erotic novels will continue to be the preferred indulgence.
Re: Mills and Boon...it is not
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 06:33 am (UTC)
Like you, when first seeing the name "Rowan Pelling" I presumed it indicated male gender, but according to several (apparently informed) comments attached to articles dating back several months--published either here at the Independent and/or by the Telegraph-- "Rowan Pelling" is apparently a female. Adds new gloss to the adage, "What's in a name?"
[info]janieluk wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 01:53 pm (UTC)
There's clearly a very healthy market for women-specific erotica in print, judging by the large displays of specialist imprints in most bookshops (especially ones in train stations). There are also entire genres of sex writing, cartoons etc. that are predominantly consumed by women, e.g. yaoi. That this hasn't carried across to magazines may have more to do with the content and marketing of those magazines than with the commercial potential. Any new magazine is a risky venture, but Rowan Pelling's take is perhaps a tad jaded.

Disclaimer: I know the editor of Filament!
Counting Women's Magazines
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 06:27 am (UTC)
Yes, some years ago I walked into a major high-street book & magazine store and counted (with the help of the Floor Manager) the number of magazines targeting women with sex and crass materialism. When I had finished counting, the resulting number totally astonished the manager.

I also included in my count, those magazines that had been brought into being to specifically target girls as young as 14 or even 12 years of age, with rank debauchery.

This is called Brain Washing; there is no other term to describe it. It is being done for a reason, and by persons and organizations you never even take into account when you bother to think outside the box.

Kindly read this article: http://www.rense.com/general86/kill2.htm

As for you "knowing the Editor of Filament." Clearly, someone working for the Independent also knows the Editor (or owner) otherwise this non-event would not have qualified as being worthy for print by a national newspaper.
Sugar and spice
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Thursday, 28 May 2009 at 11:10 pm (UTC)
Women buy a magazine with nude men and sexual themes it is erotica.
Men buy a magazine with nude women and sexual themes it is porno.
Go girls, go beautiful men
[info]hickville wrote:
Friday, 29 May 2009 at 11:56 am (UTC)
Congratulations! Following your heart is the most important ideal ever.

Undermines family values (corporeal4now)? Families are made through sex, I imagine. Let's celebrate the beauty of it, the beautiful men, beautiful women, beautiful families who make it.

Punjabi? Quite sure she's from New Zealand.

I hope this journal helps us liberate our thinking enough to celebrate the wonder and loveliness in us all.

Good luck!
Re: Go girls, go beautiful men
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 06:49 am (UTC)
Liberate our thinking? Liberation from what? Liberation has been the never ending theme of those who wish to drag all of us down to the state of animals for profit, for over 40 years!

There is almost total sexual freedom in Britain, Europe, and America already. How much more freedom do you want us to envisage? People copulating out in the open in Oxford Street, with their confederates walking around with tins in their hands seeking donations from the jostling voyeurs?

New magazines for Women keep being launched in London and New York because everybody is sexually jaded. Mizz Singh is only peddling novelty. Whatever she tries, has been tried already. The Filament project will be bankrupt within 12 or 18 months.

Sexual obsession is a mental disease. The more people have sex, the more they think they want or need it. If sex was so decisive to reproduction then how does one rationally explain the well-below replacement birth rates amongst white (Caucasian) women, world wide? It would appear that as a race, they are completely failing at being women.

As for your views as to what makes a family, they are infantile in the extreme. Sooner or later you will grow up enough to realize that without my help.
Beyond good and evil... close mouth, open mind please
[info]activatebrain wrote:
Friday, 29 May 2009 at 01:12 pm (UTC)
Intellectuals.... resorting to personal insults? making kneejerk moral judgements based on.... what?
writing off new ideas because they don't fit your view of the world? see: bullying, racism, Xenophobia...

maybe such an extreme negative reaction is due to a deep seated personal neurosis? hmmm?
maybe some people should loosen up and accept that they must find some things erotic, and are therefore into erotica themselve by some degree? hmmm?

enjoying erotica is not a crime, it doesn't make you a pervert; it shows that your higher brain functions still work and you can maintain and inside voice ie. can mentally seperate (and enjoy) sexuality from the act of sex.


See you at the Filament launch.


Re: Beyond good and evil... close mouth, open mind please
[info]errol888flynn wrote:
Saturday, 30 May 2009 at 07:18 am (UTC)
I would agree that enjoying erotica is not a crime ... but peddling erotica for profit, by first magnifying and then exploiting the insecurities of others, is!

If you see bullying, racism, xenophobia everywhere you look, then you are probably a confused communist with a social sciences degree.

And how is this for back-to-front thinking: "enjoying erotica [...] doesn't make you a pervert; your higher brain functions still work and you can maintain and [sic] inside voice ie. [sic] can mentally seperate [sic] (and enjoy) sexuality from the act of sex."

Higher brain functions? Unless you are mentally ill, how can you completely divorce love & respect from the act of sex and then have the chutzpah to call that behaviour the result of one's "higher brain functioning?"

Sexuality as a "higher brain function" is a total myth. Sexuality (and voyeurism) is driven by your Reptilian Brain: that primitive part of the brain that links us to our early hominid beginnings. Being obsessed with sexuality and all that implies is nothing more than a clear indication of rank infantilism. I know, because as a young man I once suffered from this condition myself (as nearly all Brits, male & female have done) and was not cured until I travelled and witnessed a different and better way of existence. I was also helped by reading a book that taught me how to insulate myself from outside conditioning and the vast media/entertainment complex. I have twice the strength I had years ago because I now own my own mind; I am no longer plugged into the "matrix of folly" that passes for "Liberty" in Britain and much of the rest of the West today.

Tell you what; I'll see you outside the bankruptcy courts, in about 18 months, when Filament is finally folded.

Most popular