Media

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Gately attack provokes record number of complaints

22,000 register their disgust at Daily Mail columnist's article

By Andy McSmith

Jan Moir had questioned whether the singer died of natural causes

REUTERS

Jan Moir had questioned whether the singer died of natural causes

One newspaper article about the sudden death of the Boyzone star Stephen Gately has provoked more complaints to the press watchdog than the entire newspaper industry would normally generate in four or five years.

Another 1,000 complaints poured into the Press Complaints Commission (PCC) yesterday about comments made by the Daily Mail columnist Jan Moir. Normally, that level of reaction to one story would be a record but yesterday it was a sign that things were slowing down, after a weekend when 21,000 complaints caused the PCC website to crash.

The comedian Stephen Fry and illusionist Derren Brown, who have a million Twitter followers between them, led the online charge. Charlie Brooker, presenter of BBC4's Screenwipe, wrote a newspaper article directing readers to the PCC website.

It is unlikely that many of the 22,000 complainants are regular subscribers to the Daily Mail but they all have access to its website Mail Online, which experienced a urge of traffic after the first complaints about the Jan Moir column were posted on Twitter and Facebook.

The web measurement firm Experian Hitwise said yesterday that it had detected a 21 per cent increase in visitors to the website at the end of last week. More than 1,200 comments have been posted under Jan Moir's column, which questioned whether Gately's death, after a night out in Mallorca, was genuinely from natural causes. The Spanish police and coroner said that Gately died from an undiagnosed heart condition but Moir speculated that a more probable cause was his gay lifestyle.

She wrote: "Healthy and fit 33-year-old men do not just climb into their pyjamas and go to sleep on the sofa, never to wake up again. Whatever the cause of death is, it is not, by any yardstick, a natural one." She added that his death was a "blow to the happy-ever-after myth of civil partnerships".

The PCC has taken up the case although it has not had a complaint from Gately's family or anyone directly linked to the dead singer.

The PCC's normal policy is to act only on complaints from those directly affected by an article but it has waived the rule because of the scale of the public reaction. "It's an unprecedented number of complaints about an article. there is no two ways about that," a spokesman said.

The PCC is funded by the newspaper and magazine industry and has strong links with the industry, although it acts independently. One of its leading figures, who chairs its Code of Practice Committee, is Paul Dacre, editor of the Daily Mail. In a normal week, the commission expects the number of complaints it receives about the entire content of national and local newspapers to be in double figures. It received 4,698 in 2008.

The previous record holder for the largest number of complaints generated by a single newspaper article was the Times columnist Matthew Parris, who jokily suggested two years ago that piano wire should be placed across country lanes to decapitate cyclists. That provoked about 500 complaints to the PCC.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed yesterday that they too have received complaints about the article, alleging that it incited hatred against gays. Andrew Gilliver, from the Lesbian & Gay Foundation, one of the organisations seeking to have the Daily Mail prosecuted, said: "This offensive article has been highlighted by thousands of people as inflammatory and inciting hatred to the gay community."

Jan Moir: Her controversial opinions

*On Jade Goody, written two months after she died from cancer

"A Bermondsey dental nurse and semi-illiterate who received a beatification in death that was never hers in life"

*On Jodie Marsh "I haven't got a clue what Jodie actually does, except apply brown lip liner in a manner that suggests she's mistaken a rusty drainpipe for a didgeridoo"

*On Jacqui Smith "Smith's mad ramblings and ideals [were] forged in the hairy-armpit heat of Seventies feminism"

*On Katie Price "In 10 years or more of interviewing celebrities, I have never met anyone more unpleasant or less maternal than horrible Katie Price"

*Describing Sophia Loren's dress sense "A diaphanous chiffon-layered skirt completed the outfit, which was a nice look – for a transvestite croupier"

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]bundubasher wrote:
Monday, 19 October 2009 at 11:42 pm (UTC)
Really Mr Fry and his verbal runs since he "found Twitter" - this is as bad as the Daily Mail inciting their readers to complain about BBC /Brand/J Ross etc etc etc ad nauseum.

Her comments were ill advised and insensitive and ill informed no doubt about it, but heck this is UK where freedom of speech exists. They were best ignored.It did not need the PR it got from Fry and Co


Fry- who just put his foot in "it" with his own badly worded speel about Auschwitz at that.!! Everyone is such a big mouthed hypocrite.

the nasty media
[info]merle2006 wrote:
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 at 02:08 am (UTC)
dave cameron is frantically repositioning himself away from the nasty-party image, isn't it about time the mail moved away from its nasty image. no-one likes to be thought of as being nasty, no-one likes nasty people. nasty is not the future.

not that i'm advocating toadying behaviour towards those you don't like.

on the other hand it's quite nice that nasty people behave nastily - that way you can easily identify them.
Re: the nasty media
[info]rankenstein wrote:
Tuesday, 20 October 2009 at 03:49 am (UTC)
If you want to avoid the above spam links cropping up, change the section of source code on the comments pages that reads:

to

This will make the above links valueless to spammers, and they will no longer bother doing doing it. As it is, they are only of marginal value anyway, due to the spam subject's irrelevance to the contents of the page at hand.)

(In essence, a link to a page is like a vote for a page, in Google's eyes - the code change I suggest will stop search engines following the link and counting it as a vote. If it isn't changed then this sort of spam will continue. Sad, isn't it?)

Most popular