There was 'no appetite' for hacking review, says Sir Denis O'Connor
Former home secretary Alan Johnson had "no appetite" for inspectors to review Scotland Yard's original police phone-hacking investigation, the Leveson Inquiry heard today.
Sir Denis O'Connor, the Chief Inspector of Constabulary, said he advised Home Office officials there should be an independent review after a July 2009 Guardian story alleged the illegal interception of voicemails was far more widespread than previously believed.
He told the press standards inquiry that the idea of getting Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) involved was discussed with ministers and the then-home secretary, but it "never really got off the ground".
Scotland Yard's original phone-hacking investigation resulted in the jailing of News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire in January 2007 after they admitted intercepting voicemail messages left on royal aides' phones.
But the Met was widely criticised for failing to reopen the probe after the Guardian published an article on July 9 2009 alleging there were more journalists and many more victims involved in the case.
Sir Denis said he had a discussion about the report with a Home Office civil servant on the day it appeared in print.
He told the inquiry: "I said, looking at this, that I thought the revelations merited some form of independent review.
"I thought that the allegations that were there, if true in any degree, would raise substantial public confidence issues, and I would not be surprised if the HMIC were asked to assist in some way to facilitate such an approach...
"I think there was a second - again in the margins of other business - conversation with another, more senior official.
"But my understanding was that, as with a number of other options, discussions ensued with ministers and the home secretary at the time, and there was no appetite for the HMIC being involved.
"So it never really got off the ground, sadly."
Former Metropolitan Police assistant commissioner John Yates faced criticism over his decision not to reopen the hacking investigation in the light of the Guardian article.
Mr Yates earlier told the inquiry that he was "good friends" with former News of the World executive editor Neil Wallis.
Met Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick today said the Guardian report "certainly wasn't a trivial matter" and suggested that Mr Yates should have alerted then-commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson to his close relationship with Mr Wallis before he examined the paper's allegations.
She told the inquiry: "If you do think you have any conflict, then you have to discuss it with the boss, and so that's what I think I would have done...
"I don't know how much Sir Paul knew about the relationship, but I think at a minimum a conflict like that should be discussed."
The senior policewoman added: "I was completely and totally unaware of that relationship at that time.
"It was not discussed with me at the time. Indeed I had actually never heard of Mr Wallis until early 2011."
Ms Dick also told the inquiry that Boris Johnson's deputy Kit Malthouse three times questioned the resources devoted to Scotland Yard's new phone-hacking investigation.
She reminded Mr Malthouse that it was for her to make the decision, not him, because British police are operationally independent.
Sir Paul told the inquiry last week that the deputy London Mayor complained about the level of resources allocated to the investigation because of a "political and media-driven 'level of hysteria"'.
Ms Dick said Mr Malthouse, chairman of Scotland Yard's former governing body the Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA), voiced his concerns after police launched a new phone-hacking probe in January 2011.
She told the inquiry: "On a couple of occasions Mr Malthouse, I thought jokingly, said to me, 'I hope you're not putting too much resources into this, Cressida'.
"On the third occasion when he said it again, I said, 'well, that's my decision and not yours, and that's why I'm operationally independent'.
"We then went on to have a perfectly reasonable sort of conversation about where the public interest lay."
Ms Dick said she wanted to "put down a marker" for Mr Malthouse so that he and the police investigation were not compromised if it was ever suggested that officers had bowed to political pressure.
A spokeswoman for Mr Malthouse said: "The job of the chair of the MPA and now, the deputy mayor for policing, is to question and probe the resource allocation decisions of senior police officials in order to secure an efficient and effective police force for London.
"It was entirely proper, as Assistant Commissioner Cressida Dick noted, for Kit Malthouse to probe the reasoning behind the allocation of resources into the phone hacking inquiry.
"Mr Malthouse has questioned the allocation of resources by the Metropolitan Police Service in any number of areas, including knife crime, rape, murder and gangs. His job is to hold the Met Police to account.
"The Mayor has made it clear that the phone hacking investigation has to be pursued relentlessly and thoroughly."
The Inquiry also heard that Ms Dick did not discuss the progress of her investigation into the racist murder of teenager Stephen Lawrence at meetings of the Met's top officers because of fears about leaks.
She said she restricted briefings to "people who really needed to know" and did not discuss the case at Scotland Yard's management board to minimise the risk of unauthorised information being reported in the media.
Ms Dick said: "This was an investigation which over the years had been obviously very important to the public and to the Met.
"But in the 1990s one of the things that had been difficult about it as an investigation had been unauthorised disclosure of information...
"I took the decision when I took this on that as soon as we started our forensic review in 2005-06, I would personally only brief the commissioner, and only intermittently, on the progress of that review.
"Because I was absolutely determined, if I could possibly ensure it, that only those people who really needed to know did know in case there was any unhelpful media coverage which might undermine the investigation or any future trial in terms of people's right to a fair trial."
She added: "I was concerned that if anybody was briefed who didn't need to know, and then there was a leak or unauthorised information in the media, in indeed any sort of speculation in the media, that it could reflect on everybody who had been briefed."
The inquiry heard that there was a leak about the Stephen Lawrence case in November 2007, when the Daily Mail revealed that police were investigating new forensic evidence.
Ms Dick launched a leaks investigation but it found no proof that anyone from the Met had passed any information to a journalist.
Gary Dobson and David Norris received life sentences at the Old Bailey in January for the murder of 18-year-old Mr Lawrence in Eltham, south-east London, in April 1993.
The Leveson Inquiry, sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, continues tomorrow with evidence from Scotland Yard head of public affairs Dick Fedorcio, who has been on extended leave since August pending an investigation into his links to Mr Wallis.
- 1 Moscow voted the world's unfriendliest city
- 2 The excuses your boss is most likely to believe when you call in sick
- 3 I'm pansexual – here are the five biggest misconceptions about my sexuality
- 4 More than 11,000 Icelanders offer to house Syrian refugees to help European crisis
£12000 - £13000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This social media management pr...
£23000 - £26000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: Deputy Editor - Wimbledon...
£26000 - £30000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: Editor (Magazines/Publish...
£25000 - £28000 per annum + 24 days holiday, bonus, etc.: Ashdown Group: Print...