Media

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 11° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Not in my name: Klein disowns Winterbottom adaptation

Writer left off credits by mutual agreement for Channel 4 version of her book after creative tensions with director

By Arifa Akbar, Arts Correspondent

Naomi Klein has distanced herself from an adaptation of her work 'The Shock Doctrine' by director Michael Winterbottom

Geraint Lewis

Naomi Klein has distanced herself from an adaptation of her work 'The Shock Doctrine' by director Michael Winterbottom

Neither is afraid of controversy. So when the filmmaker Michael Winterbottom was picked to direct a storming screen adaptation of Naomi Klein's book The Shock Doctrine, which takes a hatchet to free market capitalism, Ms Klein heartily approved.

But Winterbottom's work, which is to be broadcast on More4 on 1 September, has led to such insurmountable creative tensions that Klein, who originally came on board to narrate the film and act as a consultant, does not appear in the credits as a writer or consultant, or act as its narrator.

A source at Channel 4 said the writer was so disappointed with Winterbottom's vision of her book – which she reportedly felt did not carefully lay out the thesis or explain the economics but instead made unproven assertions – that she sought to distance herself from the film after seeing the early cuts.

Klein, who is believed to have wanted more interviews and have less narration in the film, was not present at its premiere at the Berlin Film Festival earlier this year and does not mention the film on her website. She conceded yesterday that there had been major differences in opinion as the project developed. "I can confirm that the original idea was for me to write and narrate the film," she told The Independent. "For that to have worked out, however, there would have needed to be complete agreement between the directors and myself about the content, tone and structure of the film.

"As often happens, we had different ideas about how to tell this story and build the argument. This is Michael's adaptation of my book, and I didn't want there to be any confusion about that. I wish the film success."

A Channel 4 spokeswoman insisted the network was "very happy with the final result". A statement read: "This film was always intended to be Michael Winterbottom's interpretation of Naomi Klein's thesis and she was closely consulted throughout the film-making process."

A film review by The Hollywood Reporter earlier this year called Winterbottom's film: "A rough, disjointed doc that fails to get across Naomi Klein's arguments against disaster capitalism."

The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism was Klein's third book, first published in 2007. It became an international and a New York Times bestseller and has been translated into 20 languages.

The book sought to explode the belief that free markets went hand in hand with democracy. Klein asserted that deregulated capitalism had consistently been forced upon vulnerable people to suit alliances of big governments and big businesses, who exploited moments of disaster and trauma, such as the Falklands War and Hurricane Katrina, to make commercial gains. A YouTube short film of the same name has been viewed more than one million times.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

I'm shocked and very disappointed
[info]steerpike66 wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 05:11 am (UTC)
This was a book that deserved a respectful, honest treatment and I expected more from Winterbottom, who I generally admire. The Shock Doctrine is such a chilling thesis that it's hard to see how it could be improved upon, as a horror story.
a great book..........
[info]panic2009 wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 06:14 am (UTC)
.........that is worthy of a great adaptation. naomi klein exposes in this book many truths that are very relevant not only in the past but the present too. a riveting read. do it justice mr winterbottom PLEASE! it could be a poerful educational tool for many daily mail and times readers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Klein's agent fell down on the job
[info]odalchini wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 06:51 am (UTC)
They should have insisted on editorial control. Enough authors have fallen into this trap in the past, that you might think every agent would be aware of it.
How arrogant that Winterbottom thought he could do a better job than Klein
[info]larkspur_14 wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 09:54 am (UTC)
in exposing the rotten foundations of neoliberalism. Did he not grasp her argument? Or was this a subtle attempt, conscious or subconscious, to subvert her argument by misrepresenting it and removing the evidence? Channel 4 is notorious for such diversionary attacks on critical issues of our time. Read the book!
I won't be watching
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 10:55 am (UTC)
Klein's book is profoundly important, and it's regrettable that Winterbottom has now discredited himself by sowing the seeds of discontent between himself and her.

Based on his other work I had thought Winterbottom was a film-maker with an important contribution to make; but now I'm not so sure.

It's disgraceful how the Channel 4 trail for his film is using Klein's name. Perhaps someone ought to tell here.

I had made a note to watch it but I will now be doing something else.

Anyone who hasn't yet made the time to read Klein's book should do themselves a big favour and get stuck into it. Although it was written before the so-called "credit crunch", it is highly relevant to today's situation.
[info]stevejones1234 wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 10:58 am (UTC)
-----"is so disappointed with Winterbottom's vision of her book – which she reportedly felt did not carefully lay out the thesis or explain the economics but instead made unproven assertions –"-----

Sounds like an exceptionally accurate adaption if that's true.
You don't understand the economics
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 11:07 am (UTC)
Since you don't understand the economics as discussed in Klein's book, you were wasting your time reading it. Or maybe it scares you.
Re: You don't understand the economics
[info]stevejones1234 wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 02:48 pm (UTC)
The problem is that Klein will print any old rubbish if it fits in with her theories. Her comments on Sri Lanka are an absolute scandal of ignorant misinformation.

She made her reputation over Iraq, and then has tried to apply the same formula everywhere else in the world, cherry picking her sources to fit her theory.
Re: You don't understand the economics
[info]costelllo wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 03:39 pm (UTC)
"Since you don't understand the economics as discussed in Klein's book, you were wasting your time reading it."

Since no rational human being would understand the deranged theology that passes for 'socialist economics' as being in any way rooted in human nature or reality i don't think he would have expected any great enlightenment to come from reading it. Amusement perhaps but nothing more.
Re: You don't understand the economics
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 07:34 pm (UTC)
Hmm. So that's what you think human nature is.
hilarious
[info]costelllo wrote:
Friday, 28 August 2009 at 03:35 pm (UTC)
"A source at Channel 4 said the writer was so disappointed with Winterbottom's vision of her book – which she reportedly felt did not carefully lay out the thesis or explain the economics but instead made unproven assertions"

You could not make this up. Considering the drivel that made up this book in the first place God only knows to what depths of madness Winterbottom has plumbed if Klein can accuse him of making "unproven assertions". Another piece of insane socialist film making to look forward to alongside Michael Moore's upcoming Capitalism.
Seen it, have you?
[info]flacksteen wrote:
Saturday, 29 August 2009 at 10:20 pm (UTC)
Why not do a hatchet job on Winterbottom's work after you have seen it? Klein may not like it, but it may be a good presentation of he thesis nonetheless.
Re: Seen it, have you?
[info]nicmart wrote:
Monday, 31 August 2009 at 07:05 pm (UTC)
Didn't Das Kapital do the job?
The new film's name
[info]nicmart wrote:
Monday, 31 August 2009 at 07:03 pm (UTC)
When Stalinists Collide!
actually, she disowns the disownment story
[info]zimarbec wrote:
Sunday, 6 September 2009 at 11:10 am (UTC)

Most popular