The sinking of Blue Peter
Biddy Baxter, legendary editor of the flagship children's show, lets fly at the BBC – and Peter Purves
Rex Features
Andy Akinwolere, Helen Skelton and Joel Defries, the current presenters of 'Blue Peter'
Biddy Baxter, the longstanding Blue Peter editor who saw to it that a whole generation of children became good citizens by watching the show, has accused the BBC of being "hugely irresponsible" by ignoring its mission to educate.
Her latest cause for anger is the revelation that the programme she devised and ruled over for 26 years now has the lowest audience figures in its history. She blames a culture that prefers game shows to quality children's programmes.
She also accused her old employers of getting in a "panic" when facing tricky decisions such as what to do about Carol Thatcher, or whether to broadcast an appeal for Gaza.
This week, the BBC Trust issued a report warning that Blue Peter's viewing figures have fallen below 100,000, after the show's slot was brought forward 20 minutes, to 4.35pm, to make room for The Weakest Link. A third of its young audience has been lost in just over a year.
"It's really rather shocking that the public service broadcasting channel has sold out in that way," Ms Baxter said. "This collapse in the figures must be due to the time. At 4.35pm, a great many children, especially the older ones, are still in school. I'm sure it's not because of the presenters, because they have got three absolutely great presenters. It's hugely irresponsible of the BBC to renege on their responsibility to a very important section of their audience. Children watch enough adult programmes not to be fobbed off with rubbish."
She also criticised the BBC for their handling of Carol Thatcher. She said: "I'm not condoning what was said, but it wasn't broadcast, but when you compare it with the Jonathan Ross business, it's just so inconsistent. And when I heard that incredible statement by Jay Hunt [controller, BBC1] I could almost see the jackboots."
Now aged 75, Ms Baxter produced and then edited Blue Peter from 1962 to 1988 - the programme's golden years, when children were given advice on gardening, caring for pets, and collecting milk bottles tops for charity. Ms Baxter made a practice of ensuring that every letter the programme received from children was answered. She has collected the best of the correspondence into a book, published last September. The jewel of the collection is a letter she received in 1973 from a nine-year-old named Anthony Hollander, who confessed to a "strange belief" that he knew "how to make people or animals come alive". He asked for a shopping list of materials he needed, including a model of a heart "split in half" and "tools for cutting people open".
Ms Baxter wrote back encouraging him to ask a family doctor. The impact on the child of receiving a reply that took his letter seriously was, he said later, life-changing. He is now Professor of Rheumatology and Tissue Engineering at Bristol University. Last year, he performed an operation that saved the life of a Spanish woman, by giving her a new windpipe made from her own stem cells.
"I still have the original letter," she said. I'm meeting Anthony Hollander next month. I think he deserves to have his own letter back. I'll make a photocopy for the BBC Archives."
Her book is fully in the spirit of the old Blue Peter, down to the detail that she is not seeking to make any money from it. Proceeds will go towards supporting graduates from music academies.
It is very different from the memoir written by Peter Purves, Here's One I Wrote Yesterday, which revealed some steamy happenings behind the scenes at Blue Peter.
To help publicise the book, Purves has talked about his brief affair with Valerie Singleton when they were co-presenters, and dropped a hint that he may have had an affair with presenter, Lesley Judd. He has also revealed he used to smoke cannabis and complained that he would have liked to appear on screen in flared trousers, kipper ties, and cowboy boots but had to defer to Ms Baxter's more conservative dress sense.
"She put me in Norwegian jerseys – awful things with deer on the front," he told The Daily Mail. "I didn't get on with her, and there were times when I actively disliked her intensely. She ruled the show, and she never understood me."
Reminded of these accusations yesterday, Ms Baxter just laughed. "I haven't read the book. Anybody is entitled to write a book if they want to, though whether it will sell, I don't know. What is a 'celebrity'? It seems very elastic.
"Peter was very lucky to have had Blue Peter as his springboard. I am sure he was absolutely terrific when he was introducing Crufts. You know his interest in dogs sprang from taking Petra the Blue Peter dog under his wing. That was one of the springboards the programme gave him."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
The Corporation is sleepwalking towards becoming an irrelevance. The reason why so many of us aged in our 40's have a certain affection for the BBC is precisely because 8 million of us DID watch the likes of Val, John and Peter in the 1960's. Now less than 100,000 watch the (very fine) team of Andy, Helen and Joel.
By rights the BBC should be extremely frightened about the future. But, unlike Biddy Baxter, today's executives only care about the short-term and their next career step.
And anyway isn't the move to an earlier slot probably just part of a deliberate attempt to kill off Blue Peter before the children's department move to Salford?
British TV needs to get back to public service broadcasting basics. There must be a clear out of top people who don't 'get' what PSB is supposed to be about.
The BBC can't even get it's website sorted properly - I live in France and much of the content is blocked. There's really no point visiting the site when I can go to other sites like this one and get better access to news from back home.
I do believe in 20 years time the BBC will no longer exist but will have been split, sold off and re-branded.
I really hope Blue Peter doesn't follow the same path that all the other programmes that have made the BBC great have gone, such as Grange Hill, Byker Grove and of course Top Of The Pops, and of course the fact that the BBC let C5 take Neighbours, although I would have hoped that by letting go of a programme that was costing them too much licence fee payers money anyway they could invest in more original ideas from the BBC, not just stick The Weakest Link in there instead.
Blue Peter has had some really good presenters in the past and has helped many charities and organisations. Possibly one of the best things was when The Scout Association in the UK made the ex-Blue Peter presenter Peter Duncan Chief Scout of the UK, for the scouting centenary. This really shows how much influence the show has had in the past, and still has today on young people.
"I'm not condoning what was said, but it wasn't broadcast..." depends what Baxter means by "broadcast". Carol Thatcher is a public figure who made a racist remark in an ostensibly private situation which found its way into the public domain. The press circulated (broadcast) that remark widely. To defend Thatcher's remark on the basis that it was "made privately" is to suggest - to my mind at least - that in some cases, racist remarks are legitimate. They are not. Racism is racism, & expressions of racism are indefensible at any level.
The BBC is out of control. It does not keep to its charter and needs reforming. With a much smaller budget.
This was shown at it's most blatant over the phone poll scandal and with the superficiality of Jonathon what's his name and that manic guy, you know the one with funny hair...
Knowledge and large chunks of integrity have simply disappeared, all run by and for the benefit of vain celebrity.
Maybe that's what the 'people' want, who knows, it's just a shame, a great loss.
I remember the good old days of Blue Peter and the fun to be had with elephants and zoo-keepers.
Perhaps they could get Carol Thatcher and Jonathan Ross on the programme to boost audience interest. Rossy could lead Carol on with a lead, she could piss on the floor and he could slip up in it.
personality.
John Craven was (and is) on a different level than some of today's presenters.
Some of the present team are just talking heads and incapable of holding anybodies attention for more a few moments.
R.Hobbs.
But people in the commercial world get to the top because of their ability to exploit (viewers), and make money for shareholders in so-doing.
These people can't switch that aspect "off", that is who they are.
I suppose this has been the problem in many other public services as well.
The BBC is excellent at documentaries, costume drama, news and sensible childrens shows and serials.
They are funded via Parliament and should not need to be obsessed by viewing figures. The MP's who approve the funding are the very people who demand better quality from them, so would presumably not be too worried by lower audience figures if decent, informative and educational programmes were being shown.
However I would watch the Ross and Thatcher show as suggested by sirrus.