MPs to quiz tobacco firm executives
Monday 28 June 1999
The hearings, before the Select Committee on Health, could replicate US congressional hearings which exposed a cover-up by American cigarette manufacturers over links between tobacco and cancer.
It will be the first serious attempt in this country to get the companies to reveal their confidential, internal reports on the links between their products and cancer since the failure, in February, of a legal action by a group of cancer victims.
The 36 victims abandoned their action for compensation against Gallaher and Imperial Tobacco after a judge ruled that they were diagnosed with the disease more than three years before lodging their claims.
The failure of the case led many to believe that the tobacco firms would not face a further challenge, but the select committee is determined to demand full exposure of documents and scientific advice about cancer, dating back to the 1950s.
The committee has the power to call for people and papers, and its Labour chairman, David Hinchliffe, told The Independent he would use his powers to get at the truth. Kenneth Clarke, the former chancellor, who is now the deputy chairman and director of British American Tobacco, could be called to give evidence.
"We want to know who knew what, and when," said Mr Hinchliffe. "We will be seeking similar information in respect of British tobacco companies that was revealed in the United States, particularly information that was not put in the UK public arena."
Mr Hinchliffe said the committee had agreed in private to go ahead with the inquiry in the next session of Parliament. He was assured by legal advisers that after the failure of the legal action, the tobacco companies could not claim the inquiry was sub-judice.
ASH, the anti-smoking group, has been pressing for such an inquiry.
Clive Bates, its director, said: "One of the memorable images was of the heads of the seven US tobacco giants raising their right arms to swear on oath that they did not believe nicotine was addictive. I would like to see the same done in this country. You don't swear an oath before the select committee in the Commons, but you lie before a select committee at your utter peril."
In the US, the evidence uncovered in the 1984 congressional hearings was used to pursue compensation claims in the courts, but in Britain, that has, so far, proved impossible.
- 1 'Women should not laugh in public,' says Turkey's Deputy Prime Minister in morality speech
- 2 The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
- 3 Is Ebola coming to Britain? UK health officials issue warning to doctors as outbreak fears grow
- 4 Richard Dawkins says 'date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse' on Twitter
- 5 Danish TV reporter is all business up top, all party down below
The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Boozy, ignorant, intolerant, but very polite – Britain as others see us
A new Russian revolution: The cracks are starting to appear in Putin’s Kremlin power bloc
- < Previous
- Next >
Competitive: The Green Recruitment Company: The Organisation: The Green Recrui...
£350 - £400 per annum + competitive: Orgtel: Project Manager (specializing in ...
£40000 - £50000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: Embedded Sof...
£50000 - £65000 per annum + Benefits: Progressive Recruitment: Working for a m...