People

Showers (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 6°C

Hit & Run: A paw carbon rating

Forget scratched furniture and suspicious patches on the living room carpet – your pet suddenly has a lot to answer for: the planet's environmental future no less.

Brenda and Robert Vale are professors of architecture at Victoria University, New Zealand, who specialise in sustainability and they claim the carbon pawprint of a pet dog (roughly the size of an alsatian), is twice that of a 4.6-litre Toyota Land Cruiser driven 10,000 kilometres a year. Writing in Time to Eat the Dog, the pair use all sorts of calculations to compare the ecological impact of pets with common vehicles or household appliances. Instead of looking at the volume of carbon dioxide produced – the normal method of measuring carbon footprints – the Vales have used the amount of land necessary to grow enough food to "power" your dog, cat or your car. So, according to the couple, 0.84 hectares of land creates enough food to feed a German Shepherd for a year, but only half this space would be enough – if all the food was converted to energy it could use – to keep a Land Cruiser going for the same length of time.

Mind-bending stuff, and more than a little scientifically dubious ("I wouldn't have thought a dog had anywhere near as high a carbon footprint as a car," says John Buckey, managing director of carbonfootprint.com). But taking the statistics at face value, did you know that cats have a marginally smaller carbon footprint than a Volkswagen Golf (both roughly 0.15 hectares)? Or that hamsters have a footprint of 0.014 hectares, meaning if you had two it would be about as environmentally dangerous as owning a plasma television? Given the state of British broadcasting, the animals would probably be more entertaining.

So what, then, is the most eco-friendly of God's creatures? Well, it's all down to size, and food consumption. If the average labrador weighs a whopping 30kg, then a schnauzer, at 7.5kg (again, an average weight) would be a third less problematic for Mother Earth. A cat, at just 5kg, would be even less harmful. Or what about a chicken or a bee? As well as being titchy, they also produce edible things.

One thing's for sure, the title of the Vales' book – essentially sticking Fido in the oven – is unlikely to win the average-dog owner over. Everyone knows cats are far tastier. Rob Sharp

Fat chance of a winner's dinner

MasterChef: The Professionals is over for another year. Marianne couldn't make her jelly set, Daniel made a balls of the brioche and Steve Groves walked off with the prize. Steve's a bit of a trickster – he endeared himself to millions with his reinvention of poached egg with soldiers – and it's a shame we won't see him any more. But we can eat his food, can't we? He's junior sous chef at Launceston Place in Kensington. Quick! Book a table before the rest of London has the same idea! "Sorry," says a chap called Zafar on the phone, "I'm afraid no tables are available this weekend," (what, are you kidding?) "although we might be able to squeeze you in on Sunday evening." Can I be sure I'm eating something prepared by Steve's hands? "Our chefs don't make individual dishes," says Zafar, "The dishes are jointly prepared by all of them." Curses. How many diners would love to summon Steve from the kitchen, to yell, Gregg Wallace-style, "Nah THAT. Is a GREAT. Plate of FOOD"? John Walsh

Gaddafi: a dedicated dictator of fashion

Colonel Gaddafi's wardrobe offered up another fashion triumph yesterday during an interview with Sky News, in which he expressed regret for the murder of WPC Yvonne Fletcher outside the Libyan embassy in 1984.

If you couldn't quite hear his mumbled apology, perhaps that's because it was drowned out by the loudness of his outfit. Gaddafi's bright green-and-brown shirt looked like camouflage, but would only work as such if he were trying to blend into the background in Balamory.

It's only after you gaze at the pattern for a moment that you realise it's actually an outline of Africa. The Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya didn't make his name as a loopy despot by choosing practicality over style. As the George Melly of the geopolitical scene, every time he attends an international conference filled with grey-suited fellow leaders he sticks out like a sore thumb.

Gaddafi's gaudy garb – the medal-encrusted military uniforms; the Saturday Night Fever suits; the colour-bending kufis; the Cuban heels; the beach shirts and classic shades – transform him from a ruthless dictator into a figure of fun, gulling us into taking him less seriously. But there are important messages in his sartorial choices, too: the Africa-print is a recurring theme from a man who's spent considerable time and energy repositioning himself as an African, not an Arab, leader. Tim Walker

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Strange Comparison...
[info]kiwilolo wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 03:11 am (UTC)
Considering the usage of pets and cars is totally different. It's not like anyone has ever had to think "hmm, should I get a landcruiser, or a cat?"

It'd be more (slightly) more fair to compare pets to humans. Even if we just look at food consumption, I'd be willing to bet a pet dog has a much smaller carbon footprint than any human in our society.
Hit & Run
[info]victhebrit wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
An obvious answer if we want to keep our pets is to reduce our own carbon footprint.

Perhaps NooLabour could legislate that for every extra carbon kg our pets/cars/homes produce then this must be offset by saving somewhere else - and perhaps sacrifice our own lives (or the lives of other family members) for that of our pets - obviously OFCOM may have something to say on this matter. Or perhaps we should adopt the book's basic premise in "Logan's Run" - anyone over 21 should report for voluntary euthenasia to give our younglings a better future...?
cat eats owner
[info]freejez wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC)
apparently the cat in the photograph ate its owner until all that was left was a hand coming out of its bottom.
here kitty kitty
[info]acidpen wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 11:14 am (UTC)
what a load of utter shit they are talking, this is the second article in this paper today claiming that animals are now bad for the environment, i think some of these scientists are one ecological calculation short of climbing up their own asses...im off to save the world....here kitty kitty
Animals
[info]hamshaw wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 12:21 pm (UTC)
"A dog is not just for Christmas"

A bit of butter and a french loaf and it could last you well into February.
FUR vs METAL
[info]boeticia wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 01:04 pm (UTC)
I can't stroke my dog or cat as lovingly as I would a car...although there are people whose lives do center on their four-wheels. Love me, love my car! Advertisements encourages one to buy one, and if that doesn't tempt anyone then they wrap a gorgeous model around and about and inside it, so one gets the impression the girl goes with the car purchase.

A better and more senisible advice - get rid of vehicles of all kinds - and keep the pets. You'l be healthier for it, (this has been medically proven) and the environmental problem would be by far greatly minimised.
Is this article really that ridiculous?
[info]bob1776 wrote:
Tuesday, 27 October 2009 at 02:55 pm (UTC)
Doesn't this perfectly illustrate the problem for the average man on the street? Governments and Corporations can use Global Warming to argue any point with figures and manipulate people, make them feel guilty and get them to stick their hands in their pockets. It's perfect (no cat pun intended).

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date