People

Partly Sunny with Showers 9° London Hi 12°C / Lo 6°C

Gary Glitter faces 'death penalty' in fictional TV drama

By Press Association

Fallen pop star and sex offender Gary Glitter is to face the death penalty in a fictionalised Channel 4 drama.

The controversial 90-minute film is set in a Britain which has reintroduced capital punishment and will be part of an examination of public attitudes towards the return of the death sentence.

Glitter signed the sex offenders register when he returned to the UK last year after being jailed for child sex offences in Vietnam. He had previously been jailed for four months in the UK in 1999 for downloading child porn.

In the Channel 4 programme, The Execution of Gary Glitter, public revulsion has led to the return of the death sentence and the first person to be tried under the new Capital Crimes Against Children legislation is Glitter.

The plot sees him charged with "sex crimes against children", according to the broadcaster, and facing the possibility of becoming the first person to be executed in Britain in almost half a century if found guilty.

It has been shot in the style of a documentary and Glitter is to be played by respected stage and screen actor Hilton McRae, who recently appeared in C4's Red Riding trilogy.

The programme follows Glitter's fictional arrest and police interview, following which he is charged with sex crimes against children committed in Vietnam. He is seen on remand in Pentonville Prison and through the Old Bailey trial which polarises public opinion, and he is seen giving his own version of the events which led to his trial, while human rights groups and death penalty supporters clash over their opposing views.

An Ipsos Mori poll commissioned by Channel 4 found 70% of those surveyed thought the UK should have the death penalty as the maximum possible penalty for the most serious crimes.

Following the screening on November 7, there will be an online debate about the capital punishment.

Channel 4's head of documentaries Hamish Mykura said: "High profile crimes against children often prompt calls for the return of the death penalty - this drama confronts the public with what many say they want.

"Putting a resonant figure like Gary Glitter into a fictional situation helps to engage the viewer as the drama unfolds. The debate around the death penalty arouses passions on both sides. This drama, with its compelling and original narrative, is an intelligent and thought-provoking examination of the issue."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]dogsolitude_v2 wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 12:45 pm (UTC)
Yeah, the whole question about the death penalty worries me... Should the State ever have a right to take the life of an individual?
[info]kineticfactory wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 12:46 pm (UTC)
Another reason for the BNP/UKIP/Daily Mail to advocate pulling out of the EU: the EU explicitly rules out the death penalty in any circumstances.
[info]reinertorheit wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 02:04 pm (UTC)
>> the EU explicitly rules out the death penalty in any circumstances. <<

Even for its incoming President, if convicted?
fact or fiction?
[info]indidomino wrote:
Wednesday, 28 October 2009 at 02:59 pm (UTC)
i find it very disturbing that C4 can show, what purports to, be a fictional, possibly provocative, program where the central character is actually the portrayal of someone living.
Gary Gliiter - Paul Gadd - has been convicted of sexual offenses, and has served his time but, considering the particular crimes he committed and the wholesale illogical behaviour of a number so-called 'normal' citizens, is it really responsible behaviour, on the part of the film-makers, to feature Glitter like this?
Remember the case of the paediatrician a few years ago? The fact that 'paed' was part of the job description was enough to incite violence - is C4 essentially doing the same towards Glitter?
It's not the job of a TV company to 'lynch' people - actually or metaphorically.
Re: fact or fiction?
[info]earwicga wrote:
Monday, 9 November 2009 at 08:38 pm (UTC)
Totally agree with you. I too find it very disturbing. What next in the fight for ratings? Horrible.
fastastic tool. fantastic idiea
[info]mayfair27 wrote:
Tuesday, 3 November 2009 at 01:44 pm (UTC)
hang him, anyone who abuses children, is most definitely a freak of nature, an anonmoly of the human race, who knows what they are commiting is totally not even on the amoral sphere of life and natural law, their mind and soul are sick and should be put down like the human animals they are. no other human beings want them around them and they cost the tax payer to keep them locked away when the money could be used to save lives. this issue definitely needs to be addressed.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date