People

Rain (AM and PM) 4° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Only a miracle can save me now, says Farrah Fawcett

Actress lays bare her struggle with cancer

By Guy Adams in Los Angeles

Farrah Fawcett in a fresh-faced publicity shot from 1975 and a scene from 'Farrah's Story' about her illness

HULTON ARCHIVE/GETTY; REUTERS

Farrah Fawcett in a fresh-faced publicity shot from 1975 and a scene from 'Farrah's Story' about her illness

Defiantly promising that she "will not go gently into that good night," Farrah Fawcett is taking her battle against cancer to the airwaves, sharing intimate and sometimes graphic details of the illness she claims left her feeling like "a blonde nothingness".

The 62-year-old actress, who is fighting for her life at home in Los Angeles, will tonight talk America through her painful struggle against the apparently terminal disease, which she dubbed her "terrorist" when it was first diagnosed more than two years ago.

In a two hour documentary, Farrah's Story, she chronicles every stage of her decline. Some scenes show her writhing in pain in hospital beds; others show her lying comatose, with dozens of needles penetrating her body. One particularly harrowing episode sees her vomiting continually, and unable to sleep.

Perhaps the most moving scene shows Fawcett tearfully cutting off what remains of her famous blonde hair, and shaving her scalp. It was filmed shortly after she learned the anal cancer had spread to her liver and intestines.

"You wouldn't stop until you got my hair," she jokes to doctors, adding that she's unable to eat liver any more after seeing pictures of her tumour. "I feel like Alice in Wonderland, it's so surreal. I feel like a blonde nothingness, alone in my own body... today it's not drugs that fill my body, it's despair."

The film premiered at an emotional screening in Beverly Hills on Wednesday night, attended by dozens of Fawcett's closest friends, including Melanie Griffith and Antonio Banderas, the actress Jacqueline Bisset, and her best friend Alana Stewart, who was responsible for much of the camerawork.

Fawcett maintains her sense of humour throughout, but the tone changes at the end of the film, when she makes an impassioned plea for America to reform its dysfunctional healthcare system, and urges the government to modernise cancer screening.

The film also shows her frustration at the media's intrusion into her treatment. Last year, police were called into her hospital after it emerged that a member of staff had sold her medical records to the National Enquirer.

An employee of the hospital, Lawanda Jackson, pleaded guilty to violating federal medical privacy laws. But Jackson died from cancer last week, before sentencing could be completed.

The public nature of Fawcett's illness has drawn comparisons with Jade Goody, the British reality TV star whose death earlier this year led to an overnight rise in the number of women seeking breast cancer screening.

In an uncanny parallel with Goody, who was married in her last weeks, Fawcett – once one of the most famous women in America, who sensationally posed for Playboy in the 1970s – has now reconciled with long-term partner Ryan O'Neal.

"Farrah is in a solid place emotionally, but physically she's a wreck," O'Neal told reporters this week. "It's a very rocky place. We put on a brave front, always, when we're with her, so she doesn't know how scared we are... in the last two years, I loved her more than I've ever loved her. I look at her with awe."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Farrah Fawcett Through the Years
[info]angelczek wrote:
Thursday, 14 May 2009 at 11:43 pm (UTC)
I have doubts about early cancer screening
[info]estcevrai wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 12:05 am (UTC)
Early cancer screening might just reveal cancer earlier that either need not be treated (not fast growing) OR cancer that would grow/mestacize despite treatments. I wonder if treatments provided today are really worth the trouble and pain. Can we humanly expect to cure everything? Are we to seek that? Or seek ways to process and approach the death process with more fullness?
Alternative Care
[info]alternatreat wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 03:29 am (UTC)
Dear Farrah,

Since it appears that this cancer is getting worse, and since it's apparent that your doctors are not stopping the cancer, it's time for you to consider alternative care. I have said to myself that if I ever had cancer, I would go to Gerson for help. www.gerson.com

Dr. Max Gerson died but his treatment facility in Mexico still operates via his daughter Charlotte Gerson. I would go down there. No one can get their type of treatment in the USA. The Gerson Treatment center is located just south of San Diego, California and the US boarder in, I believe, Tijuana, Mexico. According to Gerson, they have remarkable success with cancer patients. You can read about it in Dr. Max Gerson's book titled A Cancer Therapy, Results of fifty cases.

Some excerpts from his book...

"In more advanced cases it takes a long time, about one to one and a half years, to restore the liver as near as possible to normal." and, "...the more malignant the cells...the quicker they respond."

Do consider it. I've prayed for you. God be with you.

Regards,

Joe

And Dr. Lorainne Day is a good resource at www.drday.com
SHE CAN STILL BE SAVED
[info]georgesign wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 07:17 am (UTC)
Despite the propaganda given out by the conventional cancer treatment centres the success rate is unbelievably low. Chemotherapy and radiation initially shrink the tumour but it eventually returns with a vengeance because the immune system has been compromised. Most doctors in the know would refuse these treatments. SHE CAN STILL BE SAVED by successful alternative treatments such as the one given by Dr Simoncini in Rome http://www.curenaturalicancro.com/ Conventional cancer treatment is one of the biggest unreported scandals. How many "celebrities" with cancer have been saved using conventional treatments NON. If someone out there knows how to get in touch with Farrah Fawcett then they should at least pass on this information. I tried to reach Jade Goody through Max Clifford but he just ignored the emails. The power of the drug industry has made sure that all people trying to put forward alternative help are labelled "nutters"
Aid
[info]stickytruth2 wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 08:02 am (UTC)
Has this young actress tried alternative medcines?
contact me if it may help.
Corrections
[info]frankfurtgirl wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 08:59 am (UTC)
In case it has not already been pointed out, Jade Goody died of cervical cancer, not breast cancer and it was the rate of smear tests that went up. I think a quick proof reading of the article before posting would have caught that one! Please tell me this didn't go to print with such a blatant mistake. Or has the writer perhaps not read the news / watched television this year?

If trillions of Dollars were not spend to kill millions in wars, US would have saved Farah Fawcett.
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 10:06 am (UTC)
If trillions of Dollars were not spend to kill millions in wars, US would have saved Farah Fawcett.
Mistake on article: Jade Goody died of cervical cancer, not breast cancer.
[info]djangovsartana wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 10:19 am (UTC)
Mistake on article: Jade Goody died of cervical cancer, not breast cancer.
Leave her alone, alt med vultures!
[info]samche wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC)
Will the alternative medicine vultures stop circling this poor lass? Keep your filthy fraudulent lies away, you monsters.

Chemo and modern cancer therapies work; alternative potions do NOT. Chemo is hugely unpleasant, but it prolongs and saves lives and is getting better each year. Alt. med. scamsters lie about the efficacy of modern medicine and prey on the vulnerable with their snake oil, crystals, shaken water, waving hands and other ineffective and occasionally destructive nonsense. It is to Ms Fawcett's great credit that she has remained rational throughout her horrible illness and stayed out of the hands of these charlatans, which requires some courage. Respect.

Incidentally: django, the article does not state that Goody died of breast cancer; it stated that the uptake of breast cancer screening has increased. It is pointing up the increased awareness of cancer in general. Please don't accuse authors of making mistakes without having the courtesy to read the article intelligently.

Leave Her Alone ... Closed Mind
[info]georgesign wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 07:06 pm (UTC)
For those who believe conventional medicine has the answer and who like to call other people names when their ideas conflict here are the facts:-

"Percentage of cancer patients whose lives are predictably saved by chemotherapy - 3%
Conclusive evidence (majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influcence on survival or quality of life - none.
Percentage of oncologists who said if they had cancer they would not participate in chemotherapy trials due to its "ineffectiveness and its unacceptable toxicity" - 75%
Percentage of people with cancer in the U.S. who receive chemotherapy - 75%.
A miracle or some knowledge
[info]ndninthemachine wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 09:54 pm (UTC)
Farrah is like many americans, who are strangers to their bodies...people we are spiritual beings in a physical body...once we can seek out spiritual solutions, then we don't die of cancer, we don't lie in hospital beds, bald with needles....

Dieter
Indian in the machine
http://www.indianinthemachine.com
Bogus quackery
[info]zeno001 wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 09:37 pm (UTC)
AltMed quacks like to quote science and numbers and use sciencey-sounding words when promoting their bogus nonsense, thinking people will be impressed and convinced. Unfortunately, they do con some into thinking that coffee enemas (gerson) or sugar pills (homeopathy) or whatever is the flavour of the woo day does actually do something, but their ignorance of basic medical knowledge shines through.

The reason why the 'remedies' these quacks promote are still alternative (even after hundreds or thousands of years), has nothing to do with 'Big Pharma' conspiracies, but for one very simple and unavoidable reason: they just do not work.
illegal to advertise cancer cures
[info]zeno001 wrote:
Saturday, 16 May 2009 at 09:44 pm (UTC)
georgesign, alternatreat and others: under the Cancer Act, it is illegal - for very good reasons - to advertise or promote a cure for cancer that does not work.
Follow the Money
[info]alternatreat wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 04:14 am (UTC)
The only reason false advertising comes up is because the doctors who slice, burn, and poison their patients would loose money if it was discovered that an alternative treatment, which they are not geared up to administer, does work. This would upset, I suppose, the billion dollar industry that exists with present equipment. This identifies a moral problem: do doctors have a duty to tell their patients about alternative methods that work if it means that the industry they are using would loose money? Apparently money comes first above saving a life.

Here's a quote from the Max Gerson's book A Cancer Therapy, Results of Fifty Cases,

"In closing I would like to emphasze again that this book is written for the purpose of presenting 50 cases, almost all of them far advanced, so-called terminal cases...Every case which had been given up by cancer experts shows how far reaching the results of the treatment are. These facts render any statics unnecessary."

I'm stating where I would go for cancer treatment. If you want to slice, burn, and poison yourself, that's up to you. I'm going to Gerson. I'm not here to convince you Gerson is where it's at so to speak. I'm here to present an alternative method to cancer treatment. BTW, when reading the book, it appears that the patients are up and out of the hospital and living cancer free lives in about 6 to 18 months. And they live a lot longer than 3 or 5 years which is what the conventional system treatment considers "cured". Let everyone make their own choice.
Check your facts
[info]loz03041985 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:20 pm (UTC)
"The public nature of Fawcett's illness has drawn comparisons with Jade Goody, the British reality TV star whose death earlier this year led to an overnight rise in the number of women seeking breast cancer screening" WRONG!!! She died of cervical cancer and it increased the number of women getting smear tests, you cant 'seek' breast screening either, your either over 50 or high risk and get it or dont. Poorly written oncology articles are just so annoying to me as a radiographer!
sob, sob, it's all a big conspiracy
[info]zeno001 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 11:48 pm (UTC)
alternatreat

Yeah, yeah. I know. It's the quacks who have the answers and all doctors are in a conspiracy with government and Big Pharma to keep us all ill and dying and coughing up our money. Coffee enemas rule OK.

Of course, you can't give a reference to a respectable peer reviewed journal instead of a book or an AltMed comic, now can you?
[info]alternatreat wrote:
Monday, 18 May 2009 at 02:52 pm (UTC)
Here's false statements,

"Yeah, yeah. I know. It's the quacks who have the answers...", etc., etc.

You do what you want. But the nice thing about Gerson is that you don't have to wait until you get cancer to use their treatment. You can take action prior to getting cancer. And remember, you gotta eat. ORGANIC fresh fruits and vegetables of course.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date