People

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 14° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Caroline Lucas: There's light at the end of the tunnel

After years of infighting and unworkable policies, the Greens are at last presenting a united front – and their leader might even become her party's first MP. Geoffrey Lean meets Caroline Lucas

Caroline Lucas, taking an environmentally friendly mode of transport to a campaign rally for next month's European elections, says that the MPs' expenses scandal will help her party

JUSTIN SUTCLIFFE

Caroline Lucas, taking an environmentally friendly mode of transport to a campaign rally for next month's European elections, says that the MPs' expenses scandal will help her party

To find Dr Caroline Lucas, the first-ever official leader of the Green Party, you catch an environmentally friendly train or Tube to London Bridge station, and then take a carbon-neutral walk for the couple of hundred yards to the old Hop Exchange on Southwark Street.

Close up, from the pavement, the listed building seems past its best. But stepping through its iron gates reveals a breathtaking atrium of white walls, curved windows and green iron galleries, with a glass roof above the tiled floor where merchants traded the bitter fruit.

"What a wonderful place to work!" I greeted her early on Thursday, reaching her cramped offices off one of the galleries.

She is less enthusiastic. "It's charming, but impractical."

Just like the Greens?

"Not any longer," she retorts. And, indeed, after a day with her on the campaign trail, I am inclined to agree. Her party is changing, growing up, even – and Lucas is largely responsible. Partly as a result, it has its best chance of electoral triumph since exactly 20 years ago, when – to everyone's astonishment, including its own – it secured 2,295,695 votes, more than one in every seven cast, in the 1989 European elections.

It has dramatically changed its pitch; once unashamedly against economic growth, it now presents its policies as the best way to revive the economy. Its advertising campaign urges voters who believe they knew the party to "think again". And, unrepresented in Parliament, it is expected to reap dividends from public disgust at the MPs' expenses scandal.

Mind you, change was badly needed, for I was being too kind. For most of its 36-year history, the UK Green Party – Europe's first – has been not so much impractical as implausible, immature, frequently impossible and occasionally imbecilic. In truth, it has also been charmless, constantly fractured and repeatedly purging prominent members who achieved public appeal.

But more of that later. Now, an hour and a half before her European campaign launch, Lucas is predicting a new dawn. "It's a really exciting time for us," she says. "People are looking for alternatives. The three other parties are collected around an ever-smaller centre ground. A whole area of the political spectrum is completely empty, and it's an area where we feel we are the natural occupiers."

And that's not just on the environment, she adds ("though none of the other parties are getting anywhere close to dealing with the climate crisis"), but also on "social justice". Indeed, the manifesto blends drastic environmental measures – such as reducing Britain's carbon emissions by 10 per cent a year – with traditional left-wing policies such as building council houses. (See box.)

She goes on: "People are wanting something fresher and more authentic and a bit of passion in politics. When you see all these MPs from the other parties hanging their heads in shame over the expenses scandal, there's a very dangerous – and wrong – sense that you can't trust anyone in politics. So trying to reinvigorate the whole political system is important. There's a real new focus in the party. We do feel we are on the edge of a breakthrough."

Unfortunately, not a lot of people seem to have noticed. The surprisingly disciplined manifesto launch – with besuited candidates giving short and effective speeches – was held in a tiny, but still-half empty, room in Westminster, mainly peopled with Green Party activists. Lucas went on to appear on BBC2's The Daily Politics, but was squeezed into just a few minutes and not questioned about the party's main policies.

There was worse that evening when she campaigned in the Sussex village of Forest Row – natural territory, full of chiropractors, health food shops and superannuated children of the 1960s. The streets were almost deserted, and few stopped to chat, though she had addressed a packed meeting there only a couple of weeks ago. The campaigners ended up talking to each other in the shade of their "battle bus", an old Routemaster fuelled with recycled cooking oil.

Lucas gets frustrated, but at 48 she is well used to the ups and downs of Green politics. A doctor of literature, she read a book by Jonathon Porritt, himself a former luminary of the party, Seeing Green, in 1986. "It was one of those life-changing experiences, like a light coming on," she said. "I turned the book over and saw that the Green Party office was then based on the Clapham High Road. And I was living in Clapham at the time, so this seemed to be a sign.

"I marched out of my bedsit and up and down Clapham High Road looking for what I fondly imagined would be the large offices of the Green Party. I couldn't find anything, but eventually came across a sort of broom cupboard behind a Chinese restaurant. I walked in, volunteered and, over time, became their first paid press officer."

She then decided that she wanted to stand as a candidate, so left the party's employ and went to work for Oxfam, where she was elected to Oxfordshire County Council, the first Green ever to be elected to such a position. But in the 1992 general election the party garnered only 171,000 votes, and some prominent members suggested it should abandon electoral politics altogether. Membership – which topped 18,000 in the days of elderflower wine and organic roses after the 1989 vote – slumped to 5,000.

Yet in 1999, the introduction of proportional representation in the European elections enabled her to be one of the first two British Green MEPs. (She squeaked in for the South-east by 256 votes.) And now she has a fighting chance of being the first MP.

And therein lies a tale. Keith Taylor, a local councillor, got an unprecedented 22 per cent of the vote in Brighton Pavilion in 2005, and wanted to stand again at the next general election. Lucas challenged him for the candidacy, and won a closely fought vote. She rejects a charge of carpetbagging, saying that she was invited to stand by local members. But it says something about the party's new professionalism, even ruthlessness, in selecting its most electable candidate for its best prospect of victory.

Her election as leader last September was also, as she says, a "momentous" event for the party, as it had always rejected any idea of leadership. But she stresses that she will remain accountable, having to stand for re-election every two years, and has "no privileged position over policy-making". She adds: "The models that the other parties have used where you have a very powerful leader squashing any kind of independent ideas from the grass roots is not very attractive to the electorate."

Professor Paul Ekins, one of Britain's top Green economists and once a senior party figure, says: "Caroline has ridden the whirlwind." For attempting to lead the Greens had long been a suicide mission.

The party started, appropriately enough, with a bunny-hugger: Hugh Hefner. In 1974, he printed an article in Playboy by the doom-watching Professor Paul Ehrlich, predicting imminent disaster. A Warwickshire solicitor, Tony Whittaker, read it and was inspired. He advertised in the Coventry Evening Telegraph and got together a group to found the party, but most were against the idea. So it split even before it was established.

Another bitter schism developed a year later, and the party continued anarchic and intolerant, especially of anyone who seemed to get through to the electorate. It purged one leading figure after another, most notably Sara Parkin, whose popularity and political nous were largely responsible for the 1989 result. In September 1992, just two weeks after being hailed by the party as its "greatest asset", she was forced out of its chairmanship at its party conference. Immediately afterwards, a large proportion of the delegates gave a rapturous reception at a fringe meeting to David Icke, a former prominent Green, who proclaimed himself the son of God and denied global warming.

Lucas has not only survived but prevailed. "The Green Party is full of motivated, driven people who want to make change happen as fast as possible. Perhaps I have been slightly more patient (though I don't feel patient in the least), and have hung in there."

Policies have changed in that time: a party that started by rejecting economic growth, and long remained hostile to it, has entitled its latest manifesto "It's the Economy, Stupid". It now says without a blush, that "the old 'environment vs economics' argument was always false" and that its "central message" is that "we can tackle the recession and the climate crisis in one go". It wholeheartedly embraces the concept of a Green New Deal, rightly pointing out that environmental industries employ many more people.

The language has not entirely changed: it says it wants "to transform the economy to a new Green, stable, steady state", which seems to mean recycling and reusing resources rather merely consuming them. But the switch of emphasis is remarkable.

The mainstream environment movement now embraces Lucas's party, after years of hostility. After the 1989 results, I rang 10 of Britain's top environmentalists; only one had voted Green because, as one said: "We actually know what its policies are." Now the last three leaders of Friends of the Earth are all signed up.

And yet, I say, Greens in office have almost always disappointed; the Red-Green partnership that ran Germany for four years did much less for the environment than the conservative Merkel government that followed it. Lucas doesn't deny it, saying that Greens have paid too high a price to enter coalitions. But she vigorously protests when I add that – in one of the greatest own goals in political history – the Green Ralph Nader handed George Bush victory in 2000 by taking votes from Al Gore in Florida.

Against that, she and Jean Lambert, her fellow MEP and reformer, have built up an impressive record of initiatives in the European Parliament. And, with 119 councillors scattered across a 10th of the country's local authorities, the Greens are having an impact in local government. In Kirklees, West Yorkshire, for example, Green initiatives have provided 40,000 homes with free insulation.

The day I met Lucas, Oxford appointed a Green mayor – the first in any British city. And in the North-west, electoral mathematics mean that the last European seat will go either to the Greens or the BNP.

The first seat gained on any council is all important, she says. "Once you are through that credibility barrier, you get more candidates elected as people see your policies are effective and you deliver." Thanks to Lucas – and circumstances – the Greens now have a rare opportunity to persuade voters that, as at the Hop Exchange, crossing the threshold makes all the difference.

Eco-warriors' new agenda

* Green New Deal to create jobs, beat the recession and create an environmentally sustainable economy.

* Greenhouse gas emissions to be reduced by 90 per cent by 2030.

* VAT to be replaced with eco-taxes.

* Half of all energy from renewables by 2020.

* Four million homes insulated for free every year.

* Major expansion of public transport. Bus fleet to be doubled and railways renationalised.

* Development aid increased to 1 per cent of GNP by 2010.

* A £6bn programme to create 60,000 new low-carbon council houses Homes threatened with repossession to be bought by local authorities and rented to their former owners.

* Pensions increased to above the official poverty line for the first time.

* Everyone entitled to a basic citizen's income at jobseeker's allowance rate.

* Free and universal dental service.

* More community policing, more local police stations and the return of park keepers and bus conductors.

* Ban on GM crops; reduce pesticides.

* Ban on animal testing; zoos abolished.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Gekko: 'Green is good'
[info]jj9876 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:11 am (UTC)
It is a well known fact, that whoever becomes an MEP, is guaranteed to become very rich, it is the ultimate gravy train. So may as well grant millionaire status to a conviction politician, someone who is more concerned with planet Earth and its inhabitants rather than lining their own pockets at every opportunity.

From the list of items in the agenda above, most look reasonable.
[info]unexpectedtiger wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:52 am (UTC)
I worry that the Greens are sacrificing their some of their previous commitment to honesty and realism, such as when they claim that a 'Green New Deal' can benefit the economy (the brutal truth is that the massive adjustment we need to avert catastrophic climate change will almost certainly destroy more dirty jobs than the green ones it creates), while retaining their unpragmatic opposition to nuclear power (not great but renewables alone just won't do the job) and blanket rejection of scientific advances involving genetics and live animals.
Get pragmatic
[info]mmaddox wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 04:46 am (UTC)
Greens must learn to distinguish between long-term goals and short term promises in their agenda. Abolishing zoos may be a principled stand, but it doesn't get you votes. If you don't get votes you can't implement any part of your agenda. So, what is better? Ideological purity and no votes, or enough votes to implement at least part of your agenda?
Cash
[info]bouncer19 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 05:49 am (UTC)
Looking at the new agenda, my first thought is where is the money for all this coming from ?
Looks to me like cloud cuckoo land.
ABOLISH ZOOS
[info]indypen wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 07:53 am (UTC)
How, shoot each animal?
as an ex candidate - bollox
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 09:56 am (UTC)
Re: as an ex candidate - bollox
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
organised futility - it keeps some people safely 'busy' and will never accomplish anything significant for as long as the bulk of the population is a mindless herd managed by a pseudo-democratic system of government by means of spun illusions and instituionalised economic crime syndicates fronted by unscrupulous pols and cerebral prostitutes as judges http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Nl1/Newsroom/DG_064814
green meat eaters
[info]animalrites wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC)
The green party are just a travesty trying to get into mainstream poiltics to ride the expenses express and make grand statements form their air conditioned hotel rooms over in Europe.
Why do I think this???

Simple.I have many a run in with the greens on the matter of animal welfare.They simply haven't got a policy on creating a vegetarian society and in my opinion that excludes them from being in any shape or form a green party.

Re: green meat eaters
[info]paulwebster wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 10:54 am (UTC)
--The green party are just a travesty trying to get into mainstream poiltics to ride the expenses express

What rot - look at Caroline's record in fighting expenses and corruption in the EU. The Greens were the only party at the European Parliament to vote that MEPs should have to submit receipts for expenses and do them properly.
anti capitalist
[info]animalrites wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 10:29 am (UTC)
To add to the fact that the greens cant call themselves a real ecological party because they eat meat,they cant realistically propose any kind of profound change without being anti capitalist,and there is certianly nothing about that in their agenda.

Trust the UK to have a green party run by people who belong in the womens institute or the the rotary club

Jim
Eco Warriors
[info]cgalustian wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 11:48 am (UTC)
Sounds just too good to be true and perhaps a tad unrealistic? With so many flying pigs out there, I suspect this could be just a mere veggie burger, i.e. pig without crackling.
Europe and MEPs expenses
[info]old_green wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 12:06 pm (UTC)
It seems astonishing, given that we are in the middle of the election campaign for the European Parliament, that no-one is asking any questions about MEPs expenses, which are much larger and less transparent
expenses
[info]animalrites wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 12:18 pm (UTC)
that's a larf...so they wanted expenses to be documented...in my opinion they are just a bunch of overpaid parasites wheeled in to project a false concept of democracy...they dont even deserve their wages let alone expenses.

I am a bricklayer...I dont get expenses.I fight for animal rights...
I will say it again,the greens are a sham and they do for green issues what the bnp do for racial harmony.
jim
Here we have thorny fences and dogs as security guards.
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:27 pm (UTC)
Caroline Lucas: There's light at the end of the tunnel
Worldchanging: Bright Green: Kenyan Environmentalist Wangari ...
Kenyan Wangari Maathai, founder of the Green Belt tree-planting ... Mrs Maathai celebrated by planting a Nandi flame tree in her home town ...
www.worldchanging.com/archives/001367.html - 38k - Cached - Similar pages
Caroline, come to this lace. It is very well for you to shoe us the plush seats of the train and the iron gates that you love. Here we have thorny fences and dogs as security guards. However, I wish you well. All of us are trying you have the sympathy we at the poor ends may not have. This goes for India, Pakistan and many who have enthusiast but this is nipped in the bud
This is a story I picked up from the UK paper.
Ian Geden, former chief executive of NFU Mutual, the countryside's favourite insurer, is receiving one of the largest pensions ever awarded to the boss of a mutually owned financial services provider. Thanks to a change in the company's rules, he retired five years early without any penalty. And guess what this means to all.
Legendary investor George Soros has called the end of the global economic collapse, predicting a recovery before a period of stagnation.
Only a few months ago Soros ? who has made billions with the Quantum Fund he co-founded in the 1970s ? was speculating that the FTSE 100 would fall. But he today told a German newspaper that he now expected the global economy to recover about half of the losses suffered in the last 18 months, before leveling off for a period.
I am sorry I do not read or speak German but the gist is well meant true or not George Soros is making money whether we make or not. What to him is 340 million is to me three meals a day for a year. The difference is minor to him. To me this is the saving lost. We can wait if we have the savings. He does not to wait. The cash come to him any way. Not being pessimist, having lost a lot. I mean well for other. Beware of the positive aspect. Read more. You will see many still telling you, ?We are far from recovery.?
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Caroline Lucas
[info]colinru wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:50 pm (UTC)
She is worried about the Climate Crisis. I presume she means the fact that Global Temperatures have been dropping slightly since 1997?

Vote Green and have the opportunity to live in a cave of your choosing (they are anti-Nuclear so there will not be enough energy from Renewables to live as you do now)
Adapt or die is the drastic Darwinian
[info]famulla wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 01:55 pm (UTC)
Caroline Lucas: There's light at the end of the tunnel
I see this with the monkeys and the dinosaurs. I see my granny and my garn dad in the train to Chinese Wall that they are building and the Pyramids. The only problem is the water. Any greenery around please, please, please let me know, they will become yellow anytime. However, I am buying some land there too. Here is the reason.
Property market ?must adapt or die? in downturn
There are encouraging signs that developers are finally taking this Darwinian message to heart. But what about the banks?
Adapt or die is the drastic Darwinian ultimatum usually invoked by green campaigners. It also applies to businesses hoping to survive the downturn. In the housing industry, there are encouraging signs that some ? from developers to estate agents ? have taken the message to heart. Read this. I think I will postpone this too.
In the first insider account of how radicals are preying on vulnerable Muslim youths, the teenager describes being approached by Islamists at a mosque in south London that was used by the failed 21/7 bombers, and indoctrinated at a secret network of squats. Aged 15, he was the youngest of about 50 recruits who were shown ?martyrdom? videos and encouraged to travel to Pakistan to receive terrorist training. The Pakistan will send the water they said. loyds bad debts to soar 50% on HBOS loans
who are these? Bank may have to renegotiate toxic debt deal with Treasury, leaving taxpayers to shoulder burden for even more bad debts?Analysis: We'll pay for Lloyds' bad debts.. US banks are billions short in stress tests
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla
Well done Caroline
[info]owlqueen wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 07:07 pm (UTC)
I overlooked this article in the print version when I read it this morning (one of the perks of working at a newsagents on the graveyard shift). But since then I got home and read the Green literature and while I don't agree with 100% of their agenda, I will be voting Green on June 4 largely because of the corruption at Westminster (it goes deeper than just money into the way we vote as well) but also because the main parties need their duopoly broken in the wider sense. They also managed to get through a whole leaflet without knocking any other party - a refreshing move. I will revert to one or the other (haven't decided yet, but not the party David Cameron leads, for sure) at the general but for now...GO GREEN!
Caroline Lucas' other agenda interests and friends
[info]esther121 wrote:
Sunday, 17 May 2009 at 08:16 pm (UTC)
Currently, Lucas is keeping very quite about her foreign policy interests and beliefs. I imagine that she just doesn't to frighten mainstream voters - now wishing just not to vote Tory or Labour because of the MPs' expenses scandal. But if they were to go to her own website and then listen to her ranting about such subjects as Gaza in the company of George Galloway and leaders of Hamas, they'd know that her heart is with the other bigots and fact-twisters of the Socialist Workers' Party and Respect.
renewable energy not enough? wrong
[info]martin_wilding wrote:
Tuesday, 19 May 2009 at 02:03 pm (UTC)
i am wondering why so many people are assuming that using renewable energy sources wont be sufficient in providing our energy requirements. wind energy alone if properly utilized would produce three times our annual energy requirements. wave energy could produce half the entire worlds requirements, and geothermal energy is the cleanest energy source of all. geothermal energy completely renews itself and with a little more funding in the development of the technologies required to harness this energy there is no reason that within a short period of time we would be able to harness around 2000 Zettajoule's of the 14000 available. the entire world in one year uses 0.5 Zettajoule's of energy. thats 4000 years of clean self renewable energy.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date