First person: 'I fought the tobacco industry'
Judith Mackay, 65
Timothy O'Rourke
Mackay says: I was branded one of the three most dangerous people in the world by the organisation Infotab'
My husband John and I moved from the UK to Hong Kong in 1969. I worked in medical research and then as a doctor on an intensive care ward before focusing on women's health issues. In the early Eighties, there was a huge drive by the tobacco industry to get Asian women addicted to cigarettes.
At that time, 60 per cent of Asian men were smokers, compared to just 3 per cent of women. So the industry came up with adverts such as: "You've come a long way, baby!" They hoped to woo their audience with a message of liberation – that it was a woman's right to smoke.
I had been writing a health column for a newspaper for a while, and filed an article calling for a ban on advertising. Immediately, the tobacco industry and its supporters descended on me, trying to discredit my argument. In 1982, I received a letter from a press officer working for the tobacco industry, whom I'd never met. He wrote: "I enclose some documents which will soon be released by our client. I thought you might be interested to see them for yourself". It read: "The anti-smoking lobby in Hong Kong is largely anonymous, unidentifiable, entirely unrepresentative and unaccountable. The tobacco industry comprises identifiable, legal, accountable, commercial organisations." I couldn't believe what I was reading, and made it my mission to fight my cause to the end.
I left clinical medicine and started the Asian Consultancy on Tobacco Control, which still exists today. At that time, there was no one else campaigning for such a cause in Asia, and it was a very lonely existence. I started advising the government. Asia is a huge market for the tobacco industry, so my work posed a threat. As a result, I made a lot of enemies. In a 1989 report, A Guide for Dealing with Anti-tobacco Pressure Groups, I was labelled "A key individual [whose] presence is a danger signal". The same year, I was branded one of the three most dangerous people in the world by the tobacco organsiation Infotab.
A Smokers' Rights Group in the United States in the Nineties called me "nothing more than an evil-possessed, power-lusting piece of meat" and threatened to "utterly destroy me". The FBI took up my case and interpreted this as a death threat. This was just one example of the extreme abuse I have suffered for trying to take on the pro-smoking lobby. Until recently, I had very little support in what I was doing and was painted as a deluded extremist.
Finally, however, I have gained recognition: I received the Time 100 award in 2007 for my work, and this year was honoured with a lifetime achievement award from the British Medical Journal. My one-woman campaign has now spread, and today we are an army rather than a general. The cause has finally reached the international agenda, but it has been a right royal battle getting it there.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
Imposing hefty fines on people who ,horror upon horrors light up in their own private establishment.
The campaigns by anti tobbaco are mind boggling in there spitefullnes.
Old folks ,yes amazing, a lot of smokers make a ripe old age don't they standing outside their own sheltered accomadation in the winter cold can't smoke there can you.
Now the anti smoking zelots are trying to ban smoking in outdoor areas.
Even your own home.
They are proposing the criminalisation of perfectly good parents who may happen to smoke.
The results of the great crusade?
4000 Public houses closed since July 2007.
Possibly 100,000 jobs lost.
That doesnt include Bingo halls and resaurants.
Smoker prevelance unchanged.
The attempted denormalisation of 12 million Britains.
The heavy taxation of the poor who tend to smoke more.
The invention of Phoney statistics and very dubious science.
Why do they do this?
Because they found a way to create very well paid jobs for themselves ,(see fakecharities.org).
Usually funded by taxpayers some of whom smoke and may resent the denormalisation of their lifestyle choices.
The other point is the agenda they set for the removal of other Liberties in general .
Goverments suddenly realised how much control freakery they could get away with.
These people practically invented the nanny state.
A bad precedent indeed.
Judith may believe that she has led a crusade to save souls, but these souls did not want saving. They wanted to be left alone by busybodies to live their lives as they pleased.
How sad that individuals should make it their life's' work to prevent others having pleasure. Then, once they have made millions of people miserable, their mission will move to other pleasurable activities. Is it because these people have no pleasure in their lives that they cannot stand it when they see others who do.
We all have to die of something and if smoking reduces lifespan by a fraction of time..So what !!
The anti smoking zealots love to describe the agonising deaths that smokers 'may' suffer, without mentioning that many deaths that they cannot attribute to smoking are just as gruesome.
The myth of second hand smoke has now been spun so many times that people actually believe it.
The only people benefiting from all this spin are the large pharmaceutical companies that profit greatly from the NRT that people are being either frightened or coerced into using, and the anti smoking brigade that feed off the back of these companies to retain their employment and position.
Has it occured to Judith that these Asian women that she has 'saved' from the evils of smoking may have been much happier if she had left them alone to decide for themselves ?
The anti
If you wish to quit by all means thats your choice.
My choice is to smoke .
Nobody elses business but my own.
Besides we all know smoking mortality rates are grossly exajerated.
It kills us slowly
quiting is hard but accepting your addicted is the first step I dont want to be addicted to a substance that is killing me!
Do you?
This is just another myth put about by NHS & other antis. I smoked average 30/day for over 50 years and stopped within one hour with no withdrawal symptyms and no will power needed when I was told the truth about tobbacco and nicotine.Google Allen Carr download Scandal (free) and you`ll be amazed.
any law passed against the wishes of the majority of the people( 70% against it before the ban 90% since it has been in place)
built on lies(passive smoking hoax)
driven by a extemist misinformation
& fueled by intolerance & ignorance
has no chance of success, not in britain anyway, the proofe is that there are more young smokers now than before the ban, 40 pubs a week are closing down, 12million smokers & possibly a similar number of non smokes are furious at having their entire social lives ruined. millions of people marginalised demoralised & demonised. road deaths up by 13%, millions of pounds wasted & they have the cheek to say that it is a success.
now it is proven to be a total failure at every level it must be repealed,& the extremist neo nazis that implimented it removed form office (& charged with curruption in my opinion)
as there is no doubt in anyones mind now that ASH is an instrument of big pharma (anti smoking products produce over $60 billion) their lies & funding exposed
all laws in history with this kind of background have been repealed so it is only a matter of time before reality returns. common sence, decency & respect will return i am sure, but not until the evil done by these people is undone, all the elements are now in place to crate civil war so something must give soon, the smoking ban is the most visible & the most obviouse spark to ignite such a conflict
so parliment beware, you may be able to steal money from us,
but to close the pubs you must be mad. or think that we are