Let me ask you this: 'Who controls land ownership on the moon?'
Saturday 14 June 2014
The law of outer space is governed primarily by the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies. Commonly referred to as the 'Outer Space Treaty', the agreement was opened for signature in 1967 and entered into force that same year.
Article I of the Outer Space Treaty declares that the exploration and use of outer space shall be "the province of all mankind". [It] designates outer space and the bodies contained therein, including the Moon, as res communes, ie, the property of everyone. What this means in practice is that space is treated just like a commons on Earth. Anyone can make use of the commons, but no one has any property rights while they are in situ. Subsequent practice has established, however, that resources, once removed, become the property of the removing party.
The Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies (the 'Moon Treaty'), opened for signature in 1979 and entering into force in 1984, attempted, without great success, to redefine the nature of property rights for outer space. The Moon Treaty expressly prohibited any form of property rights for in situ outer space resources pending the creation of an international property rights regime. That regime has yet to be developed. Moreover, such a regime is unlikely ever to be created under the auspices of the Moon Treaty, given that the agreement has been ratified by (and thus only applies to) a tiny handful of states – none of which has significant, independent, space-faring capability.
While it is currently impossible for any entity to purchase or claim a fee simple interest in non-terrestrial property, there is, nonetheless, one small loophole that would entitle an entity to temporarily exercise rights similar to a property claim for a limited region on, for example, the Moon. The OST does permit a nation, and by extension one of its citizens, to exercise a zone of control around a landing site for safety purposes. Thus, as long as you were actually present, you could exercise effective control of the landing site and its immediate environs. You could prevent others from intruding and extract mineral resources for use at the site or even for sale. You might even be able to sell your lunar installation to a new occupant so that they, in turn, could make use of the local environment. That said, no official fee simple interest accrues as a result of your presence. As soon as you (or your successor) abandoned the site, it would be legally indistinguishable from any other portion of the Moon, ie, it would have the status of a commons.
Lawrence D Roberts, Space Law & Policy Academic
These answers all come from quora.com, the popular online Q&A service. Ask any question and get real answers from people in the know
- 1 Top 20 misconceptions people believe are true
- 2 'We're not heroes, just tourists': Swedish police officers on holiday stop vicious assault on New York subway
- 3 Black Mass trailer: Johnny Depp might have started making good films again
- 4 Jacob Lescenski and Anthony Martinez: Straight student asks gay friend to High School prom and makes a million Twitter friends
- 5 Australian student Tommy Connolly, 23, adopts his pregnant, homeless 17-year-old cousin to give her a chance at 'a better life'
Top 20 misconceptions people believe are true
Sofyen Belamouadden murder: The inside story of a crime that horrified Britain
'We're not heroes, just tourists': Swedish police officers on holiday stop vicious assault on New York subway
Head transplant: man will be attached to new body in under an hour and aim is immortality, doctor says
Australian student Tommy Connolly, 23, adopts his pregnant, homeless 17-year-old cousin to give her a chance at 'a better life'
The sickening truth about food banks that the Tories don't want you to know
Katie Hopkins on LBC: Listen to caller taking The Sun columnist to task over migrant comments
Migrant boat disaster: Ukip candidate mocks victims in sickening Twitter post
Nigel Farage wants the BBC to stop making programmes like Doctor Who, Strictly Come Dancing, and Top Gear
Global warming: Scientists say temperatures could rise by 6C by 2100 and call for action ahead of UN meeting in Paris
Rupert Murdoch berated Sun journalists for not doing enough to attack Ed Miliband and stop him winning the general election
Voluntary: Cancer Research UK: We’re looking for someone to support our award ...
£70000 - £90000 per annum + bonus + car allowance + benefits: Ashdown Group: H...
£28000 - £32000 per annum + Excellent benefits: Ashdown Group: Application Sup...
£28000 - £32000 per annum + Excellent benefits: Ashdown Group: Systems Analyst...