Science

Showers (AM and PM) 5° London Hi 10°C / Lo 5°C

Mobile phone use 'raises children's risk of brain cancer fivefold'

Alarming new research from Sweden on the effects of radiation raises fears that today's youngsters face an epidemic of the disease in later life

By Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
Sunday, 21 September 2008

null

Getty

The Swedish research was reported this month at the first international conference on mobile phones and health

Children and teenagers are five times more likely to get brain cancer if they use mobile phones, startling new research indicates.

The study, experts say, raises fears that today's young people may suffer an "epidemic" of the disease in later life. At least nine out of 10 British 16-year-olds have their own handset, as do more than 40 per cent of primary schoolchildren.

Yet investigating dangers to the young has been omitted from a massive £3.1m British investigation of the risks of cancer from using mobile phones, launched this year, even though the official Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research (MTHR) Programme – which is conducting it – admits that the issue is of the "highest priority".

Despite recommendations of an official report that the use of mobiles by children should be "minimised", the Government has done almost nothing to discourage it.

Last week the European Parliament voted by 522 to 16 to urge ministers across Europe to bring in stricter limits for exposure to radiation from mobile and cordless phones, Wi-fi and other devices, partly because children are especially vulnerable to them. They are more at risk because their brains and nervous systems are still developing and because – since their heads are smaller and their skulls are thinner – the radiation penetrates deeper into their brains.

The Swedish research was reported this month at the first international conference on mobile phones and health.

It sprung from a further analysis of data from one of the biggest studies carried out into the risk that the radiation causes cancer, headed by Professor Lennart Hardell of the University Hospital in Orebro, Sweden. Professor Hardell told the conference – held at the Royal Society by the Radiation Research Trust – that "people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20" had more than five-fold increase in glioma", a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system. The extra risk to young people of contracting the disease from using the cordless phone found in many homes was almost as great, at more than four times higher.

Those who started using mobiles young, he added, were also five times more likely to get acoustic neuromas, benign but often disabling tumours of the auditory nerve, which usually cause deafness.

By contrast, people who were in their twenties before using handsets were only 50 per cent more likely to contract gliomas and just twice as likely to get acoustic neuromas.

Professor Hardell told the IoS: "This is a warning sign. It is very worrying. We should be taking precautions." He believes that children under 12 should not use mobiles except in emergencies and that teenagers should use hands-free devices or headsets and concentrate on texting. At 20 the danger diminishes because then the brain is fully developed. Indeed, he admits, the hazard to children and teenagers may be greater even than his results suggest, because the results of his study do not show the effects of their using the phones for many years. Most cancers take decades to develop, longer than mobile phones have been on the market.

The research has shown that adults who have used the handsets for more than 10 years are much more likely to get gliomas and acoustic neuromas, but he said that there was not enough data to show how such relatively long-term use would increase the risk for those who had started young.

He wants more research to be done, but the risks to children will not be studied in the MTHR study, which will follow 90,000 people in Britain. Professor David Coggon, the chairman of the programmes management committee, said they had not been included because other research was being done on young people by a study at Sweden's Kariolinska Institute.

He said: "It looks frightening to see a five-fold increase in cancer among people who started use in childhood," but he said he "would be extremely surprised" if the risk was shown to be so high once all the evidence was in.

But David Carpenter, dean of the School of Public Health at the State University of NewYork – who also attended the conference – said: "Children are spending significant time on mobile phones. We may be facing a public health crisis in an epidemic of brain cancers as a result of mobile phone use."

In 2000 and 2005, two official inquiries under Sir William Stewart, a former government chief scientist, recommended the use of mobile phones by children should be "discouraged" and "minimised".

But almost nothing has been done, and their use by the young has more than doubled since the turn of the millennium.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Comments

123 Comments

When you understand the above article then you will have no problem understanding my statement below.

When the young childern of 2-3 years set in front of the newer and larger TVs sets a few hours each day the stronger Electromagnetic Fields from the TVs is what really causes Autism. The childern end up with their frontal lobes of their brains cells being mutated by the stronger Electromagnetic Fields that reach out 4 to 6 feet.. The Limbic System in the brain can't communicate or operate with the mutated frontal lobe cells. Del..

Posted by delbert Parkinson | 26.09.08, 08:30 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The incidence of brain cancer in the population is about the same order of magnitude as lung cancer among non-smokers. A relative risk of 1.2 is claimed for passive smoking and lung cancer. This was judged enough to ban smoking even in private clubs. Here a relative risk of 5.0 is being claimed. By current standards this is huge. Most relative risks associated with the new "health fascism" are less than 2.0. If further investigations come up with similar figures, then the Government will have no alternative but to bring in legislation banning the use of phones on , for example, public transport. Being a smoker who posesses neither a child nor a mobile phone, I find the situation amusing and look forward to further developments.

Posted by jon | 25.09.08, 13:17 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Interesting news, but not especially convincing.

I'm not familiar with this particular conference, but generally speaking, research which is presented at conferences has not undergone scientific peer review and should not be given the same weight as peer-reviewed papers published in reputable scientific journals.

Which almost all indicate that electropollution - and the cottage industry that has grown up selling magic stickers that somehow prevent it - is a giant scam.

We have no shortage of *legitimate* cancer triggers in our environments: chemicals that offgas from our carpets, paints, shower curtains, and upholstery; pharmaceuticals that are showing up in our water supplies; inadequately tested additives in cosmetics and foods. Any of these could be skewing the results in a demographic with increased cell phone use (do the teenagers in question also eat more junk food, or spend more time indoors?).

Posted by Deborah | 25.09.08, 05:22 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If you live in the US, you need to know that it is almost USELESS to try to bring this up in local, county, or state hearings regarding cell-tower installations.

The telecom industry was able to lobby/push/bury a provision in the federal telecom act of '96 (HUGE act, no congressmen read through it all)... that makes it illegal for any gov't board to use health issues as a reason for disapproval of tower installation requests. This was based on the "findings" of the FTC --a federal agency with NO health expertise whatsoever (and which is manned by many, many "ex"-telecom employees)-- that claim there are "no significant risks to the public."

So, if you are trying to fight a tower installation, don't waste too much time pushing the health-risk issues, as they are not allowed to (officially) consider them. Find whatever other angles you can-- especially financial, and negative public opinion, those always get attention. Good luck!

Posted by Jesme | 25.09.08, 01:41 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Not only the radiation from the headset, but also the towers emit radiation. The bee crisis from last year was reportedly from cell phone radiation. I am sure many media talking heads will downplay this study--- the public should not worry about things like juvenile brain cancer. Nothing to see here
Do not keep your cell phone on your person, keep it in a purse or on a table--- this also is not good for your body.

Posted by Janeille | 24.09.08, 16:40 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I will cite this report in my health writing.
Howard Romaine, writer for Tennessee Tribune,
www.thetennesseetribune.com

Posted by Howard Romaine | 24.09.08, 14:13 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Scream this newsfrom the mountain tops.All parents should know.

Posted by Canada Goose | 24.09.08, 02:39 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details


Are dangerous radiated emission from other sources being ignored ? One area seems to be emissions from high frequency power supplies used in fluorescent lighting, especially the new T5 lighting systems found in most offices, schools, hospitals, public and private buildings.

BS Standards 55015 & 61000 are used to regulate and control these type of products but many products do not comply to this standard ~ so are our children sitting under products that emit high levels of radiation ?

We know that these emission will interfere with radios, wireless systems, wi-fi, electronic control systems etc and concerns about mobile phones and health is well documented ~ but are the lighting companies doing even more damage right above our heads ~ day in day out !

Anyone with any more information on radiated emissions from high frequency lighting products ? We need to know more and would like to hear from any technical / electronic / EMC or interested readers.

Posted by Ron Deakin | 24.09.08, 01:58 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

Any comment that says this study is wrong has been written by an mobile phone company employee!!!

Posted by Peter | 24.09.08, 00:29 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

For those so bent out of shape about the 'conspiracy' of government and industry to make money by keeping us in the dark... what about the 'conspiracy' of cancer advocacy and marketing? It's big business. If this finding is true (although nothing can be proven on the basis of 1 study), since the exposure is extremely common, there would be some meaningful increase in absolute risk. But, it will still be very small in relation to the many more common and significant (and well documented) social ills and other health outcomes (injury? accidents?) that result from our cell phone obsession. Even an elevated risk of brain cancer would still be far down the list on impact factor. So, where has all the hysteria been before?

Posted by Karen | 23.09.08, 17:48 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

123 Comments