Science

2° London Hi 4°C / Lo -2°C

Stem cells could be the secret reason why breast is best

Scientist says mother's milk may play vital role in helping children 'fulfil their genetic destiny'

By Susie Mesure

Only 3 per cent of UK mothers still breastfeed at five months

pa

Only 3 per cent of UK mothers still breastfeed at five months

Breast milk, long revered for the nutritional advantages it gives a newborn, could be just as vital in terms of infant development, a leading scientist will claim this week. Up to three different types of stem cells have been discovered in breast milk, according to revolutionary new research.

Dr Mark Cregan, medical director at the Swiss healthcare and baby equipment company Medela, believes the existence of stem cells means breast milk could help a child "fulfil its genetic destiny", with a mother's mammary glands taking over from her placenta to guide infant development once her child is born.

"Breast milk is the only adult tissue where more than one type of stem cell has been discovered. That is very unique and implies a lot about the impressive bioactivity of breast milk and the consequential benefits to the breastfed infant," said Dr Cregan, who is speaking at Unicef's Baby Friendly Initiative conference this week. His research has isolated adult stem cells of epithelial (mammary) and immune origin, with "very preliminary evidence" that breast milk also contains stem cells that promotes the growth of muscle and bone tissue.

Scientists will use his discovery, made at the University of Western Australia, in Perth, Australia, to attempt to harvest stem cells from breast milk for research on a range of issues – from why some mothers struggle to produce milk to testing out new drugs that could aid milk production. "There is a plentiful resource of tissue-specific stem cells in breast milk, which are readily available and from a non-invasive and completely ethical source," Dr Cregan said.

Advocates hope the discovery will help to lift the UK's breastfeeding rates: only one-third of babies are exclusively breastfed at one week, the number dropping to one-fifth at six weeks. At five months, only 3 per cent of mothers still exclusively nurse their babies – although the World Health Organisation recommends that babies should consume only breast milk until they are at least six months old.

Rosie Dodd, campaigns director at the National Childbirth Trust, said: "This finding highlights the many factors that are in breast milk that we know so little about and that all have different advantages, such as helping a baby's immune system to develop."

Dr Cregan said the discovery of immune stem cells was the "most exciting development", adding, "It's quite possible that immune cells in breast milk can survive digestion and end up in the infant's circulation. This has been shown to be occurring in animals, and so it would be unsurprising if this was also occurring in human infants."

British scientists gave a cautious welcome to Dr Cregan's discovery, warning that just because stem cells exist in breast milk did not mean that they could be used to develop a therapy – the ultimate goal of stem cell research. Chris Mason, professor of regenerative medicine at University College London, said: "It may give us some insight into specific breast diseases and is potentially valuable when it comes to drug discovery and drug development but it is fanciful to think it could provide routine therapies."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Prudery
[info]fourpie wrote:
Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 09:23 am (UTC)
Until we can get rid of the irrational prudery that exists in all parts of the UK, but even more so in Scotland, breastfeeding will always be dropped as soon as possible by mothers subject to peer pressure. That is not to criticse mothers. Like the majority of us, we are programmed to follow. It is a brave minority who breastfeed in public, and more strength to their resolve for doing it.
(no subject) - [info]ladyjackdododo - Monday, 23 November 2009 at 12:57 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]lirongispig - Monday, 23 November 2009 at 03:07 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]skinty wrote:
Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 08:54 pm (UTC)
Personally, I've not experienced any negative reactions to breastfeeding my four-month-old baby in public. In fact, people always seem to find it rather sweet, and smile at me. Breastmilk is an amazing substance and we don't know enough about it even now, which is why it's such a shame so many women give up on breastfeeding - especially as once you are through the first couple of months it is so much easier after that. Sadly, formula companies spend more money promoting thier products than the Government does promoting breastfeeding, and until women get the support they need for the time they need it, more and more babies will be denied thier birthright of breastmilk and the benefits it conveys. To make a difference, visit http://www.breastfeedingmanifesto.org.uk/
support
[info]sneeple wrote:
Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 09:16 pm (UTC)
there needs to be so much more support for women who want to breastfeed and are undermined at every turn, there is such a lack of will in most maternity wards both in my experience and from what I have heard. The 'breast is best' posters are all very well but when your midwife warns that you will have to top your baby up with formula as they don't know how much milk your baby is getting from the breast what is an inexperienced mother to do? When no one will spend the time to explain to you how to breastfeed and how to position your baby how can you resist the lure of the apparent simplicity of the bottle?

Hopefully as more becomes known about the benefits of breastmilk the NHS will get properly serious about promoting and supporting it as the way babies should be fed rather than sympathising with the 'inability' to breastfeed.
Pardon?
[info]lexusperplexus wrote:
Monday, 23 November 2009 at 09:25 am (UTC)
Yet another example of a newspaper publishing a company press release without checking up on the facts.

Dr Cregan is spouting nonsense. Breast milk isn't the only adult 'tissue' where more than one type of stem cell can be found. Dental pulp also contains different types of stem cells.

Also, he says that there's ""very preliminary evidence" that breast milk also contains stem cells that promotes the growth of muscle and bone tissue." These are the only stem cells that are useful, and they're either there or they're not, so whatever "preliminary" evidence he has, it's not scientific evidence.

Come on Independent, you can do better than just copying and pasting what you get told by some PR and passing it off as news. That's what the tabloids do.
Re: Pardon?
[info]mama_h_madison wrote:
Friday, 4 December 2009 at 03:40 pm (UTC)
Could be that the article is just poorly written... that wouldn't be a first in the history of journalism. This happens almost every time a new scientific discovery comes out. In fact, if you read the sentence, it's obvious that there's something wonko with it.

Still, it's an interesting discovery.

Most popular