Success isn't written in the stars, it's in the length of your fingers
Take a look at your hands – you will learn a lot about yourself, Cambridge University scientists say
Susannah Ireland
The traditional pattern in women, long index fingers can predict a child's academic strengths
It is the simplest hands-on experiment – and, for once, it is safe to try this at home. Compare the length of your fingers and predict your own future.
Everything from sporting prowess to academic ability, sexual orientation to susceptibility to disease can be assessed on the twin measurements of the length of the ring and index fingers. It is science's answer to palmistry.
Researchers at Cambridge University have found that finger length can point to success in the City. Traders with longer ring fingers made the most money – up to six times more than those whose ring fingers were relatively short.
The study, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, found finger size accounted for 20 per cent of the difference. Though the finding provoked scepticism – one blogger tartly responded, "Scientists with little else to do than measure fingers should pull their own out" – the Cambridge boffins are not alone. The significance of finger length has been investigated by research groups worldwide – with surprising results.
The ratio between index and ring finger is believed to be linked to exposure to the male hormone testosterone in the womb. On average, men tend to have longer ring fingers and women longer index fingers. The higher the testosterone, the greater the length of the ring finger and the more "masculine" the resulting child – whether male or female. The longest ring finger is known as the "Casanova pattern".
Professor John Manning, author of The Finger Book, said the ratio was a "living fossil" of the early period of pregnancy – a measure of past exposure to testosterone, and future potential.
Ring finger longer than index finger
More often found in men than women, people with longer ring fingers tend to excel on the sports field, especially in running and football.
Scientists at the University of Bath found that children who had longer ring fingers are better with numbers-based subjects such as maths and physics, which are traditionally male favourites. A study this week showed autism may be linked with exposure to testosterone in the womb. Autism is sometimes described as the "extreme male brain" and is four times more common in boys than girls. Finger length might provide an early warning of the condition. Canadian researchers from the University of Alberta have found a correlation between length of the ring finger and levels of physical aggression – as would be expected in the most masculinised individuals.
Index finger longer than ring finger
The traditional pattern in women, long index fingers can predict a child's academic strengths. Scientists at the University of Bath found that longer index fingers indicated good verbal and literacy skills, where girls dominate. The findings were published in the British Journal of Psychology in 2007. Studies of sexual orientation have shown that lesbian women are more likely to have longer ring fingers, suggesting exposure to higher levels of foetal testosterone. Professor John Manning said research he had conducted suggested that gay men were more likely to display feminised finger ratios, suggesting less testosterone exposure in the womb.
However, sceptics have observed that twin studies show that 70 per cent of the difference in finger length is inherited from our parents.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
I wish science put and end to research that only serves to reinforce the "fossils" of gender stereotypes. I am female and have terrible difficulties with multitasking ( I cannot read even a simple sentence when I can hear music or human voice, cannot talk with the TV turned on etc.), I cannot mention any of this without someone somewhere saying with disbelief: but you are a woman, you should be good at multitasking! As if my neurological make up also meant that I am less of a woman. I have the feeling that the next step will be taking peaks at colleagues fingers whilst secretly judging them "oh look he is not so masculine in the end, his index finger is a tad longer"...
I am a petite female, very attractive body style, I work at it, I have a closet full of shoes and purses, love beautiful cloths, and appreciate beautiful women (absolutely love the look of a confident athletic Man) and yet I've always have felt detached from other females. Hate gossip, am not interested in girl talk and the emotional everday rollercoaster ride most of my female associates and accquaintances seem to enjoy as they must hash out and count out the same problems over and over again. (I've learned that these kind of women arent looking for solutions, they need to be this way). I would love to have a real girl "friend" but I haven't been able to tolerate the ones I've tried to befriend and have found that so far my real friends in life have been males. I'm married & have four sons of my own. My ring finger is obviosly longer than my index and my hands are not quite as feminine as many of my counterparts; my hands are not large by any means either, they just look like I work with them. I guess I always wondered why I'm not so much like most women i know.