£500m 'squandered' on scheme to help dangerous prisoners
Experiment is branded 'unscientific and ineffective' as thousands of mentally ill offenders go untreated
Sunday 14 March 2010
Latest in Crime
On Facebook
From the blogs
Bahrain: One year on
I am used to endless lies and criticism from the BNP and its favourite blogster, as well as Islamist...
HIV orphans in Thailand prepare for the future
In Baan Gerda, a community for HIV infected or affected youngsters in Northern Thailand, a group of ...
Online House Hunter: England’s most romantic places
Our Online House Hunter goes in search of romance this Valentine's Day...
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Nearly £500m has been squandered on an experimental scheme to treat Britain's most dangerous offenders which experts have branded "ineffective", "unscientific" and "wasteful".
A new report by the Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (SCMH) found tens of millions of pounds are spent every year on a few hundred offenders, many of whom will never be released from prison or hospital, while thousands of other mentally disordered prisoners are left untreated and thus more likely to reoffend.
The report, Blurring Boundaries, to be published this week, calls on the Government to "phase out" the programme, which has admitted about 450 murderers, rapists and other violent offenders in the past nine years. This puts the cost of treatment for offenders in the four dangerous and serious personality disorder (DSPD) units at just over £1m per person.
Research into the controversial DSPD programmes has been overwhelmingly critical as little evidence of psychological or social improvements have been found. Condemnation mounted after it became clear that it would be impossible to know if the multimillion-pound experiment reduces the risk of reoffending because the Government refuses to change the selection process needed to make proper evaluation possible.
Max Rutherford, the report's author, said: "The research we have so far is unanimous: after nearly 10 years the programmes are ineffective and some people actually get a bit worse. There is no risk to the public if the programmes were to stop today, yet tens of thousands of prisoners have no access to services which could help them and protect the public."
The controversial programmes were set up at Frankland and Whitemoor prisons and two high-security hospitals after the Government promised to "deal with the most dangerous offenders" in 2001. It followed a row when the former home secretary, Jack Straw, claimed that psychiatrists refused to treat Michael Stone, diagnosed with a personality disorder and convicted of two murders in 1996.
Between 3,000 and 5,000 prisoners could benefit from the programme, according to official estimates, yet the units – which cost between £200,000 and £300,000 per person per year – have never been fully occupied.
Early government research led by Peter Tyrer, professor of community psychiatry at Imperial College London, found disgruntled prisoners who spent only 10 per cent of their time doing anything resembling therapy. "Large parts of the money have been wasted, and such investment cannot be justified," Professor Tyrer said.
Other critics include John Gunn, retired professor of forensic psychiatry at the Institute of Psychiatry. "The DSPD programme was not launched because of a desire to help people with a personality disorder; it was all about locking people up," he said. "It has been incredibly expensive; hasn't made any difference to the public; no lives have been saved here and nor have any patients been helped. This was not a scientific response, but a political response."
A Justice Ministry spokeswoman defended the programme. Treatment is expected to last for three to five years and, since most units have been fully operational only since 2005, relatively few individuals had shown positive benefits. "We envisage this will increase during the coming year," she said.
Richard Charlton from the Mental Health Lawyers Association said: "While no one is arguing that those few hundred people don't deserve help, half a billion pounds is truly an extraordinary figure. This money would have gone a long way to helping the army of mentally unwell prisoners get on the road to recovery."
- 1 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 2 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 3 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 4 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 5 Amanda Knox set to break her silence – and pocket a fortune from book deal
- 6 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 2 Apple admits it has a human rights problem
- 3 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 4 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 5 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 6 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 8 Mona Lisa's 'twin sister' is discovered – 500 years late
- 9 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 10 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Career Services
Day In a Page
No secularism please, we're British
Working as a jail torturer ruined my life
New Arsenal face an old question of credibility in San Siro




Comments