Child rapists' sentences reviewed
From the blogs
Time for the monthly treat from David Hayes, who writes about British politics for the Australian In...
Cask ale brewers don’t come much bigger than Marston’s. In fact the brewery, which also owns thousan...
Nadine Dorries talks freely about many things, but not whether she was paid to go on I'm a Cleberity...
Thirteen-year-old Conor awakes in bed one night to discover that the yew tree outside his house has ...
The Attorney General's Office is reviewing the sentences of two
child rapists who were jailed for just 40 months for attacking an
Roshane Channer and Ruben Monteiro, both 21, were each jailed for less than three-and-a-half years after they admitted raping the schoolgirl in a block of flats in Luton, Bedfordshire, last July.
A spokeswoman for the Attorney General's Office said either the Attorney General Dominic Grieve QC or the Solicitor General Edward Garnier QC would review the case and make a decision whether to appeal by March 9.
Sentencing the pair, who claimed the young girl looked at least 14, Judge David Farrell QC reportedly told Luton Crown Court there were exceptional factors in the "abhorrent" case that led him to reduce the sentence.
"Despite her age it is accepted she was a willing participant, but the law is there to protect young girls from this type of behaviour and to protect them from themselves," he said.
The Attorney General's Office said it was reviewing the sentences following a number of requests.
Leading children's charity the NSPCC was among those who urged the Attorney General to intervene, saying the sentences were "incredibly light" and "apparently failed to take fully into account the fact that under law no child can consent to sex".
Andrew Flanagan, the charity's chief executive, said: "We have called on the Attorney General to urgently review this case as the offenders appear to have been given incredibly light sentences considering they were found guilty of raping an 11-year-old girl.
"The judge even described the case as 'abhorrent' but we are concerned that the judge has apparently failed to take fully into account the fact that under law no child can consent to sex.
"And it's certainly not credible to accept a defence that the rapists thought the girl was 14 when she was eleven."
He went on: "This was a vile attack on a girl barely out of primary school which was even recorded on video so the pictures could be circulated.
"We have no doubt the sentences should be much heavier than the 40 months which have been imposed."
Channer, of no fixed address, and Monteiro, of Luton, both admitted rape and will be on the sex offenders register for life.
- 1 Freedom fighters? Cannibals? The truth about Syria’s rebels
- 2 Breaking the Silence: In the reality of occupation, there are no Palestinian civilians – only potential terrorists
- 3 Special Report: US troops are stationed in Japan to protect the nation. But to sex workers in Okinawa, they bring fear, not security
- 4 Vice pulls 'breathtakingly tasteless' fashion shoot glorifying the suicides of famous female authors from Sylvia Plath to Virginia Woolf
- 5 Iran to send 4,000 troops to aid President Assad forces in Syria
Feat of engineering: Incredible photographs show construction beneath New York's Second Avenue
Charles Saatchi accepts police caution for assault after trying to dismiss Nigella Lawson row as 'playful tiff'
Google, BT and Yahoo! agree plan to tackle child porn
Exposed: Edward Erin, the doctor whose faked asthma drug test results proved fatal
Charles Saatchi: Taking caution for holding Nigella Lawson's throat was 'better than it hanging over all of us'