Guardian reporter Amelia Hill will not face criminal charges over alleged Scotland Yard leaks
Cahal Milmo is the chief reporter of The Independent and has been with the paper since 2000. He was born in London and previously worked at the Press Association news agency. He has reported on assignment at home and abroad, including Rwanda, Sudan and Burkina Faso, the phone hacking scandal and the London Olympics. In his spare time he is a keen runner and cyclist, and keeps an allotment.
Tuesday 29 May 2012
A journalist who was questioned under caution by police investigating alleged leaks from inside Scotland Yard’s phone hacking investigation will not face criminal charges.
The Crown Prosecution Service announced yesterday there was insufficient evidence to bring Amelia Hill, a reporter for The Guardian, and an unnamed Metropolitan Police detective to trial over claims that confidential information about the identities of people arrested on suspicion of voicemail interception was leaked from inside the investigation.
The decision to formally question Ms Hill, 37, who has written extensively on phone hacking by the News of the World, raised concern that contact between reporters and confidential police sources was being criminalised. There was no suggestion that money was passed between the journalist and her source to obtain information.
Alison Levitt QC, principal legal advisor to the Director of Public Prosecutions, said: “The information disclosed by the police officer, although confidential, was not highly sensitive. It did not expose anyone to a risk of injury or death. It did not compromise the investigation.”
The CPS said it was satisfied that between April and August last year, Ms Hill had written ten articles containing confidential information provided by the 51-year-old detective while he was working on Operation Weeting, the Yard’s ongoing inquiry into the phone hacking scandal.
But Ms Levitt said there was not enough evidence to bring a charges against the pair relating to misconduct in a public office. She added that although there was sufficient evidence to prosecute both individuals for a data protection offence, it was not in the public interest to do so in either case but that the Yard should consider disciplinary proceedings against the detective.
In a statement, Ms Hill said the nine-month investigation into her work was a “completely disproportionate response by the police, and a sinister attempt to chill public interest journalism”.
Diving in at the deep end is no excuse for shirking the style stakes
Israel-Gaza conflict: Death toll tops 125 after overnight raids as Operation Protective Edge continues
Game of Thrones author George RR Martin says 'f*** you' to fans who fear he will die before finishing Westeros saga
Ian Thorpe gay: Olympic swimmer comes out in Parkinson interview
Supermoon 2014: When and why will the moon look bigger and brighter this summer?
Gaza-Israel conflict: Pro-Palestinian demonstrators take to streets of London, Paris and New York in wave of protests
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’
- 1 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 2 Japanese plant experts produce 10,000 lettuce heads a day in LED-lit indoor farm
- 3 War is war: Why I stand with Israel
- 4 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
- 5 The true Gaza back-story that the Israelis aren’t telling this week