Police defend appeal over 90-year-old Rochdale woman after tests find no forensic evidence of rape
Police issued an appeal for information on Tuesday over the alleged attack
Police investigating the alleged attack of a 90-year-old woman have defended their public appeal after fast-tracked test results revealed there is no forensic evidence she was raped.
On Wednesday, Greater Manchester Police issued an appeal for information over the alleged incident, during which the woman said she had been dragged off Spotland Road in Rochdale and attacked at about 6.45pm on Tuesday while on her way to a local shop.
Officers said the pensioner had been through a “horrific ordeal” and the community would no doubt share the police’s “revulsion” at the nature of the alleged crime.
Tests were then fast-tracked overnight by detectives working on the investigation and results showed that at this stage there is no forensic evidence to corroborate that an attack of a sexual nature took place.
Specially-trained officers are continuing to work with the pensioner and offer her support and police are investigating the full circumstances of the incident.
The force said it is continuing to appeal to anyone who may have seen the woman in order to determine exactly what occurred.
Superintendent Alistair Mallen, of Greater Manchester police, said on Thursday: "The lady in question stated she had been raped and she gave the same account when she was video interviewed.
"As people would expect we carried out forensic tests and these were fast-tracked overnight. The results now show that there is no forensic evidence of a rape taking place.
"Something has clearly happened to this lady so we would like to hear from anyone who saw anything.
"It is important to state that was a report made in good faith, by an elderly, vulnerable lady and, as such, people would always expect us to investigate thoroughly.
"When we receive a report of this nature we will always investigate to establish the full facts and, alongside this, we will do everything we can to support the victim.
"People may question why we took the decision to go public and, to that, I can say that we had a duty of care to both the complainant and to the wider public. When making these decisions we have to weigh up the need to inform the public with the need to reassure them that they are not in any danger.
"Every case is considered on its individual merits at that particular time and, in this case, it was felt the community needed to be made aware.
"The most important aspect to remember is that we will always investigate reports of sexual offences and we always encourage victims to speak to the police.”
New essay by JK Rowling went live on Pottermore site on Friday
New UK station Russia Today gives a very bizarre view of Britain
'Nasa Confirms Six Days of Darkness in December': No, they don't - it's a hoax
Tower of London poppies: Tens of thousands of people flock to see installation in its final days
Top Gear presenter Jeremy Clarkson criticised for beer tweet
Woman blinded as a child can see again after hitting her head on a coffee table
Bryan Adams' heartstopping images of wounded British soldiers to go on show at Somerset House
Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are real and God is not 'a magician with a magic wand'
Huge surge in Ukip support after EU funding row, according to new poll
Ukip ‘exploiting grooming scandal’ to secure party’s first police chief
Nigel Farage: 'There’s nothing wrong with white people blacking up'
Maureen Lipman says 'she can't vote Labour while Ed Miliband is leader'
Muslims, immigration and teenage pregnancy: British people are ignorant about almost everything
- 1 Chinese authorities arrest 11 people over exhuming woman’s body to sell as corpse bride
- 2 Canadian actor punched in face after 'Islamophobia' experiment goes wrong in wake of Ottawa shooting
- 3 Woman blinded as a child can see again after hitting her head on a coffee table
- 4 Paul Hollywood: Police asked if I wanted them to arrest Mary Berry for vandalism after she 'defaced' my car
- 5 If you think Russell Brand’s new book is confused, you should read what his critics have to say about it