Theresa May's claims to justify 'snoopers' charter' anger campaigners
The Home Office say the moves are essential to keep pace with criminals using new forms of communication
From the blogs
Thirteen-year-old Conor awakes in bed one night to discover that the yew tree outside his house has ...
SPOILERS: Do not read this if you have not seen series 5, episode 11 of ‘Made in Chelsea’ It’s hard ...
One of the questions you get asked most as a chef is 'what would your last meal be?'
Quotation of the Day, from Deborah Mattinson, boss of Britain Thinks, about focus groups' views of t...
Theresa May has outraged civil liberties campaigners with a decision to press ahead with proposals to give police and security services sweeping new powers to monitor phone, email and internet use.
The Home Secretary will announce plans today to widen surveillance of suspects in criminal conspiracies. The Home Office insists the moves are essential to enable police to keep pace with criminals and terrorists who are increasingly using new forms of communication.
But civil liberties campaigners say the government is resorting to Big Brother tactics. Rachel Robinson, of Liberty, said: "Successive governments seek to watch the whole population instead of targeting real suspects. Just like the internet, any private home can be a crime scene, but should we install hidden cameras and microphones in every bedroom in the land?"
Liberal Democrat MPs, as well as some Tories, have criticised the scheme, branding it a "snoopers' charter".
Critics' anger is likely to be further enflamed by revelations that the Government is set to offer a blank cheque to internet and phone firms that will be required to track everyone's email, Twitter, Facebook and other web use
The Home Office confirmed it will foot the bill for collecting and storing the extra social media and web browsing records. The department defended its plan, saying that unless the new powers are brought in almost a third of terrorist plots and paedophile rings will soon be beyond detection. Under the proposals, companies would be required to keep a record of when, where and to whom messages were sent but police would not be able to see message contents.
- 1 Alan Pardew's warning to Joe Kinnear: I am still the Newcastle manager
- 2 Breaking the Silence: In the reality of occupation, there are no Palestinian civilians – only potential terrorists
- 3 Charles Saatchi accepts caution for assault over incident in Scott’s restaurant when he put his hands on throat of wife Nigella Lawson
- 4 Exclusive: Cristiano Ronaldo advised to stay at Real Madrid for another 18 months before making possible switch to Manchester United
- 5 Iran to send 4,000 troops to aid President Assad forces in Syria
Charles Saatchi accepts caution for assault over incident in Scott’s restaurant when he put his hands on throat of wife Nigella Lawson
Special Report: US troops are stationed in Japan to protect the nation. But to sex workers in Okinawa, they bring fear, not security
Police examine photographs of Charles Saatchi with hand on Nigella Lawson's throat
Russian President Vladimir Putin denies stealing £16,000 diamond-encrusted Super Bowl ring
Iran to send 4,000 troops to aid President Assad forces in Syria