UK

Rain (AM and PM) 2° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Britain is wasting the lives of its soldiers, Ashdown warns

By Brian Brady, Whitehall Editor

The former Liberal Democrat leader Lord Ashdown has accused ministers of "wasting the lives" of British soldiers killed in Afghanistan, claiming the international community did not have a plan to bring peace to the country.

As President Barack Obama named his envoy to the war-torn country, Lord Ashdown issued a grim warning that the "scandal" of inadequate planning threatened Nato's ability to take advantage of victories over the Taliban. Lord Ashdown, who had once been earmarked as a UN representative in Afghanistan, said insufficient military and aid resources had been committed to the country. He warned that a resolution of its problems would not be reached without better international co-ordination and an agreement involving major powers.

He added: "I fear that we are now – and it is a scandal – wasting the lives of our young men and women whom we are putting in the frontline in the most difficult circumstances when our political leaders have failed to produce any kind of plan that can take advantage of the victories they win over the Taliban at great cost. If you speak to senior commanders in Afghanistan, you will find they are saying the same thing. They are winning the battle, often at great cost in death and mutilation of our soldiers, but I am afraid to say the international community has failed to take advantage of the victories they have gained."

Lord Ashdown welcomed President Obama's decision to appoint the veteran diplomat Richard Holbrooke as his "point man" on Afghanistan and Pakistan. And he backed Mr Obama's plan to deliver a "surge" in US troops to fight the Taliban. But he said the international community was trying to stabilise Afghanistan with 1/25th of the military personnel and 1/50th of the aid it committed to Bosnia.

"The issue is the complete failure of the international community to have a plan," he told BBC Radio 4's 'Today' programme.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Afghanistan
[info]49niner wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:32 am (UTC)
As a former soldier, one hopes Lord Ashdown knows what he's talking about in military terms. Unfortunately, political reality suggests the moment for "defeating" the Taliban, if that was ever possible, has passed.

Our political leaders seem stuck with the illusion that we can and should intervene in remote corners of the world and sort other people's problems for them. It's a sad hangover from the British Empire. It has no place in the 21st century.
Wasting soldiers lives
[info]mindful2020 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 08:57 am (UTC)
The Afghans regard war as a we would regard sport.
If we partake in that sport we must be prepared to pay the same deadly high ticket price as do the Afghans. A high price we cannot and should not be prepared to pay.
A soldier's duty is firstly to defend his own country - that does not include playing war games abroad for whatever petty stakes you care to mention from oil to opium.
Right wing arrogance
[info]jilanisyed wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 10:47 am (UTC)
Afghans may accept a leader whose heart and life has always been in Afghanistan. Karzai who is labelled as the mayor of Kabul, is regarded a puppet and has no credibilty as a sincere afghan or a leader. Obama's admin is disaappointingly similar to bush's. It has right wing arrogance and will continue in Bush's precedence. Taliban has found a strategy to fight this war indefinitely so instead we should try to facilitate the afghans to chose a leader that is their own choice and has their countries interests at heart, should we be lucky enough to get another opportunity.
Afghanistan
[info]jonno19 wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 05:33 pm (UTC)
The Foreign Secretary asserts that there is no co-ordinated global terror threat - just a number of unco-ordinated regional disputes - and this neatly leads him on to disparage Bush's global 'War on Terror'. If this is the case, the conflict in Afghanistan is just another of those local conficts. Why for goodness sake are our young men and women dying there?
Re: Afghanistan
[info]neil_mcgowan wrote:
Sunday, 25 January 2009 at 06:03 pm (UTC)
The Foreign Secretary has done a remarkable u-turn on the "war on terror" - of which he was a signed-up fan during the Bush Administration.

Ask anyone in the bunch of crooks claiming to be the British Govt - and not one of them can tell you why we are in Afghanistan. Except, that is, to cover Uncle Sam's arse.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date