Children left at risk by rise in legal costs
The number of vulnerable youngsters taken into care has fallen after a 3,000% increase in court charges
Thursday 20 November 2008
Latest in Home News
On Facebook
From the blogs
Roy Hodgson for England: A club of one
To argue against Harry Redknapp for England is akin to arguing in favour of bankers bonuses. While s...
Time for a reality check on the Sri Lankan civil war
Sri Lanka, much like Britain, has side-lined accountability long enough.
Children Of Alcoholics week: One million children may just be the tip of the iceberg
Children Of Alcoholics week starts today. So, what are the aims for Nacoa during this important week...
Review of Being Human: ‘Being Human 1955’
Following on from an episode tinged with tragedy, this week lifted the mood with something lighter.
Children at risk of abuse are being left unprotected following a sharp fall in the numbers being taken into care, a children's charity says.
Figures obtained by The Independent from Cafcass, the children's legal charity, in the wake of the Baby P case, show that more than 600 fewer court applications were made by local authorities to take children into care in the past six months compared with the same period in 2007.
Lawyers blamed the 20 per cent drop on a 32-fold increase in the court fees charged for care proceedings imposed by the Government, which rose from £150 to £4,825 from 1 April.
Additional changes requiring local authorities to explore options for placing children with the extended family before applying to the courts were also increasing risks, they said.
In the six months from April to September 2008, after the rise in costs was introduced, 2,568 care applications were made, compared with 3,199 in the same period in 2007, a fall of one fifth.
Barbara Esam, a lawyer for the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, said: "I don't see how, all of a sudden, we have got fewer children who need the protection of the court. I don't think because of the size of the reduction we can be confident that we are making the best choices for all children. I hope the Laming inquiry into the Baby P case will monitor the effect of the fee increase. I think it's a real concern."
Piers Pressdee, co-chairman of the Association of Lawyers for Children, said: "Children are being placed at risk because local authorities don't have the means to fulfil everything they should be doing before taking proceedings. It will lead to care proceedings not being taken when they should be. The clear advantage of taking care proceedings is that it is the best means of ensuring the safety of the child and of any future children in the family."
Nicholas Crichton, a senior judge at Wells Street family proceedings court, London, said the large increase in court fees was a "significant disincentive" to local authorities to take care proceedings. "The principle of charging a fee to bring proceedings to protect vulnerable children to me is shameful, absolutely shameful," he told the BBC.
Ministers have defended the 3,000 per cent rise in fees on the grounds that it is necessary to ensure the courts are self-funding, and that councils had been awarded £40m to cover the increased legal costs. But the rise has caused anger among social workers. Four councils, supported by the NSPCC, challenged the Government's decision in the courts. But, in a ruling earlier this month, the judges said the £40m compensation provided by the Government was "sufficient".
Around 28,000 children are in the care of local authorities in England, after a legal process which takes an average of 52 weeks.
In a separate development, Ofsted, the inspectorate for children's services, said local authorities were failing to investigate serious cases of child abuse adequately where things had gone wrong. In a review of 92 cases, it said 38 had been inadequately carried out and 20 had been conducted well.
- 1 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 2 Fear for deported Saudi 'ridiculous', says Malaysian home minister
- 3 Eight arrests as Murdoch 'throws staff to the wolves'
- 4 Israel blames Iran for embassy bomb attacks
- 5 Now The Sun tries to call in its favours from Downing Street
- 6 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 7 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 1 Kate Allen: It's time for America to put an end to this shameful scandal
- 2 Spotify: 1 million plays, £108 return
- 3 Chemotherapy is 'safe during pregnancy'
- 4 Rhodri Marsden: What we like and what we don't like are often closer than you'd think
- 5 BBC to issue global apology for documentaries that broke rules
- 6 Lightning kills an entire football team
- 7 I was born to be a killer. Every night I see the Devil in my dreams
- 8 Henry does it his way, ending on a high note
- 9 Modern lovers: The 'sexual body warriors' and pioneers transforming 21st-century relationships
- 10 Redknapp hints at same old faces for England
Free trial of new Independent iPad app
Get your daily dose of the best of British journalism, sponsored by American Airlines
Win a three-week coastal jaunt
Spend three weeks exploring every nook and cranny of gorgeous Atlantic Canada.
Amazing restaurant offers
Three glasses of free champagne and a special menu at 46 top London restaurants.
Latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
Day In a Page
Apple admits it has a human rights problem
James Lawton: AVB looks all at sea
Procrastination: Not now – I'm busy
Silent revolution at the Baftas
The diva who had – and lost – it all


Comments