Inside Yarl's Wood: Britain's shame over child detainees
Emily Dugan on the shocking treatment of families in immigration centres
AP
Children suffering from serious medical conditions and the mentally ill were routinely kept in detention despite guidelines stating clearly they should not be
Children held in the infamous Yarl's Wood immigration detention centre are being denied urgent medical treatment, handled violently and left at risk of serious harm, a damning report by the Children's Commissioner for England will say tomorrow.
Sir Al Aynsley-Green's investigation paints a shocking picture of neglect and even cruelty towards children trapped within the centre's razor-wired walls, and finds "substantial evidence that detention is harmful and damaging to children and young people".
Since opening in 2001, the Bedfordshire detention centre has been plagued by hunger strikes, self-harm incidents, a suicide and riots. It was severely damaged by fire during disturbances in 2002. Despite repeated scandals – and the damning findings of this report – planning permission was given last month to double the centre's capacity from 405 places to nearly 900.
Around 2,000 children a year are held in immigration centres – half in Yarl's Wood, which has been run by a private company, Serco, since 2007. The experience they described is prison in all but name. Politicians, immigration experts and doctors last night called for an end to the detention of children and for urgent measures to ensure other detainees are treated humanely.
The report, based on the most recent inspection by Sir Al, reveals that basic safeguards for children in Yarl's Wood are failing. Welfare issues raising "serious concern" were ignored, with children forced to remain in custody even when they were seriously ill or in danger from parents with mental health problems, the report says. It also criticises the "scant regard to basic welfare needs" during arrest and transportation to the centre.
Key meetings between social services, the UK Border Agency (UKBA) and Yarl's Wood staff designed to discuss the welfare implications of keeping a child locked up for more than 28 days dwelt instead on PR and legal concerns. The commissioner calls for an urgent review to "ensure the best interests of the child are central to decisions on detention".
The UKBA claims that steps have now been taken to protect children since the inspection last May, but Lisa Nandy, policy adviser at The Children's Society, disputes this. "The agency has not made the improvements necessary to safeguard these children," she said. "The Secretary of State for Children must intervene immediately as this report exposes serious child protection risks which have not been adequately addressed."
The commissioner found that seriously ill children were denied hospital treatment, while bureaucracy substantially delayed others with critical conditions from getting to hospital. A baby with pneumonia and a teenager with severe mental health problems were among those affected. Despite being the main detention centre for children, no one on the Yarl's Wood health team has child health qualifications, the report says.
Sir Al found major healthcare shortcomings at the centre, describing safeguards, records and professionalism as inadequate and below NHS standards. He reports that two children with sickle cell disease were not allowed to bring their penicillin with them when they were seized from their homes. As a result they became seriously ill and required urgent treatment. Instead of being referred to hospital for intravenous fluids and antibiotics they were simply given paracetamol. Under the NHS this would be categorised as a life-threatening "Serious Untoward Incident".
Children suffering from serious medical conditions and the mentally ill were routinely kept in detention despite guidelines stating clearly they should not be. One diabetic child had three emergency treatments in the 24 days she was detained – including two occasions where her blood sugar left her "un-rousable" – but was still not released. An eight-month-old baby with asthma was neither released nor given an inhaler.
Immunisations were denied to children documented as needing them, creating a health risk. One child was even given the wrong vaccine, while the centre's policy for preventing malaria was described as containing "serious errors" and being "unacceptably poor".
Doctors working for Medical Justice, an organisation that provides voluntary medical assistance for Yarl's Wood families, insist there is wider evidence of medical abuse beyond the commissioner's report. They say they have documented evidence of a child under 12 being given his mother's anti-depressant drugs on removal; of a young person in severe pain with sickle cell disease being denied painkillers because he was unable to walk to the clinic to receive them in person; and of children contracting severe malaria on being returned to their home country because they were refused suitable preventative medicine.
Paediatrician Dr Fred Martineau said: "The detention of children, whether newborn babies or adolescents, almost invariably causes them physical or emotional suffering. Doctors from Medical Justice regularly see the effects of this, ranging from a failure to give immunisations against potentially fatal diseases, through to clinical depression ...The only way of preventing this harm is to end their detention."
Healthcare at Yarl's Wood has long been a problem, with outbreaks of vomiting bugs and chickenpox common. The centre was last night understood to be in the middle of yet another chickenpox quarantine.
The report describes the ordeal of "dawn raids" – where up to 20 officers arrive to seize families in the early hours of the morning. Children repeatedly reported being treated with violence, including being dragged on the floor and thrown to the ground.
Young people told how traumatised they were by the experience, noting that officers seemed to be laughing at them and "taking pleasure in the family's distress". The study said: "In a large majority of cases, children reported that officers' behaviour had been aggressive, rude and, on a few occasions, violent."
Children were even watched by officers of the opposite sex while they dressed, which the report called "an unacceptable safeguarding risk which must be addressed immediately". They also had to watch parents being handcuffed and heavily restrained – a direct flouting of UKBA guidelines. One mother, so distressed at being handcuffed in front of her family and thrown into a caged van, tried to hang herself with her son's shoelaces.
Caged prison vans are routinely used to transport children to the centre near Bedford, despite promises that people carriers would be used for families. Children were denied toilet breaks or food and drink. The vans, the report says, are "stained with urine and vomit".
The commissioner also expressed concern at the increase in the length of time for which children are being held, which threatens their mental well-being. Last week, the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, told MPs: "Detention is a final option and is only used for the shortest period necessary." But the Children's Commissioner says: "The average length of time children and young people are being detained is increasing, and, crucially, the decision to detain them is neither being used as a last resort nor for the shortest period of time as required by Article 37 of the UN Convention on the Rights of a Child."
In conclusion, Sir Al calls for an end to the detention of children. "Each year in the UK, we detain around 2,000 children for administrative purposes. This has to end," he said.
His call was echoed by the Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg, who said: "The incarceration of thousands of children accused of no crime, often for months on end, is inhumane. The treatment of these vulnerable children in Yarl's Wood is a shameful indictment of the Government's failed immigration policy."
The Border and Immigration minister Phil Woolas said: "If people refuse to go home then detention becomes a necessity. We don't want to split up families, so we hold children with their parents, and while they are in our care we treat them with sensitivity and compassion."
Taken away: 'They came for us at night'
Dominic Mwafulirwa trembles at the words "Yarl's Wood". The eight-year-old was asleep when six guards wrenched him and his mother, Cecilia, 35, from their Swansea home in the early hours three months ago.
They had arrived in the UK from Malawi when Dominic was a year old. Cecilia, who had run away from an abusive husband, started a new life in Wales, where Dominic excelled at school. That life ended abruptly when the men arrived.
"Dominic didn't say a word from the time they came until we were locked up," Cecilia says. "It was hard to keep his spirits up. When I asked him why he wasn't going to the school at Yarl's Wood, he said: 'What's the point? We're not learning anything.' He refused to wash and started smashing things. He's still really angry and confused.
"We spent 50 days in that place. I lost 20kg. I'm a sickle cell patient and by the end of the 50 days my haemoglobin was too low. I'm really anaemic and they knew I had depression. They changed my medication and they threatened to take my son away."
Cecilia and Dominic have been out of Yarl's Wood since the end of March. They have yet to find out whether they will be allowed to stay in the UK.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
And? What will come of it? A damning report? Paper.
I am actually a bit poor at the moment and feel persecuted by the UK government. Maybe I should fly off to Bahrain and seek asylum there? If for whatever reason I don't get regular food vouchers, accommodation paid for by the government, free health care, free schooling for my children and a giro benefit, I will state my treatment is against my human rights.
I actually class myself as a left wing liberal, but the whole asylum debate really gets my goat. Fact is, if you don't like the system then leave, try another one in another country. The United Kingdom isn't a free for all and it should have responsibilities to its own citizens first and foremost.
But you're quite right, let's not treat them with any human dignity or respect: second class humans, second class treatment, even if they are babes in arms.
Now... where have I heard that before....?
Let's get another thing clear: lots of the people who arrive at these centres mix deviousness with an utter desperation to get out and melt into the black economy by whatever means, including resorting to criminal damage and violence, as they well know that they have no case to be accepted on asylum or any other immigration terms. This is why, despite the best efforts of very well-meaning and caring staff, there are instances of "hunger strikes, self-harm incidents, a suicide and riots." It?s also why they have to be kept in secure facilities. The alternative is to allow a free-for-all which would result in mass abscondments.
Another unspoken truth: The Children's Commissioner is another New Labour quangocrat, a superfluous busy-body who is motivated to invent problems where non arise, to keep him in a job. I simply do not believe his assertion that: ?seriously ill children were denied hospital treatment,? and would like to see his evidence. Centres are staffed by qualified doctors and nurses and provide round-the-clock medical treatment in excellent facilities.
To say that ?healthcare at Yarl's Wood has long been a problem, with outbreaks of vomiting bugs and chickenpox common,? completely misses the point that many of the people in these centres arrive there already carrying these sort of illnesses. It?s not the conditions in the centres which are the cause, the nurses and doctors perform immediate full medical assessments on newcomers upon their arrival, and have to cope with diseases once thought belonging to the middle ages such as scurvy.
If we don?t keep people who have no right to be in the country in secure detention facilities, the result will be chaos. People who refuse to face this fact, however uncomfortable it may be, are not seriously addressing the issue.
Something the journalist Emily Dugan should read and possibly reply to, especially the last paragraph!
If the system decides against them, they are swooped up, put in cages and taken to Yarl's Wood. Quite often, the system has been faulty - and they are taken to Yarl's Wood ILlegally. If they are lucky, and have a good lawyer, they are then released and they sue the UK Government for ILlegally detaining them.
I'd have thought you'd be more concerned with how much of your money as a taxpayer, is being paid out in compensation from UKBA acting ILlegally, and detaining people who should not be detained.
To my amazements when I read this line, I wonder what sort of human we are. Honest. Then we talk of our kids carrying knives and going to the red zones and rob. We are pathetic and forgotten the religions and we have no moral. Is the fault of the tutors who are paid low? Is this the government self-indulging into the budget fixing forgetting that there are children our future assets, or are we plain stupid? Are we followers of Darwin and think that the new generations will give us better wisdom then we have. Then I must say we are in a sorry state. We are poor and illiterate. Irresponsible and carefree.
I thank you
Firozali A. Mulla
are struggling to survive.! We are a VERY small Island
Country that, thanks to officials who ignored the correct
warnings of Enoch Powell, have become overun with gypsies
and travellers, who illegally set up wnd trash wherever
and whenever they please.! Africans from goodness knows
where and hoardes of others who we definately do not need
here.! We cannot absorb the sad story masses of the World.!
We M U S T take care of our own working class, jobless,
poor and elderly F I R S T.!!! Let the rest of Europe and
the World, who have much more space offer them help and
we'll just watch and admire.!
Ghurkas have honour, and care passionately for children. It's one reason they deserve so much respect from us.
Also, the first country you reach is the first place the transport you are on lands on. I think you'll find for a lot of people, that's Heathrow Airport, as they mistakenly believe the British are fair, humane and caring of the Human Rights of others.
Isn't it a pity, they are so wrong?
How do you deal with someone who deliberately goes to the toilet to avoid being put on a plane?
Sedation I guess is the only answer.
Which should be interesting, as those whose job it is to assess such things, point out that mothers with children in school are the least likely group to abscond. Little things like feeding their kids, seeing them safe in a clean bed at nights, and learning enough to raise them out of abject poverty, being important to the mothers.
But no doubt you know better! :-)
Lets see how many actually would remain at home.
People need to accept that detention is necessary and hopefully with a change of government on the horizon, we'll have treble the amount of bed spaces to remove failed asylum seekers and overstayers.
septimusgrunge
these are children for crying out lod
mind you that rather depends on how you define children I would say any human being under 12 years of age
if this story applies to little children it is truly monstrous- but maybe I have the wrong end of the stick
It's not intended to be a pleasurable experience, it just encourages more people to appeal. If they had entered the country legally, after applying through the proper channels, then they wouldn't face either deportation or detention.
Despite world opinion to the contrary, the UK is not and should not be a holiday camp open to all and sundry.
Goodness me, did a chapter of the BNP find out about this article, and ask every member in the country, who knows nothing at all of the issues and the processes, to post nonsense in the comments?
You do wonder!
Please do try and catch up on the facts! It might help you in being heard, if you actually spoke on what happens. Deary deary me - you should all get better briefings!
How did she manage to pay for her and her sons travel to the UK?
Of course, she brought her 'sickle cell' with her...and then complains that her FREE medication was changed. I'm absolutely sure that the Malawi Government wouldn't give her free anything!
Cecilia....One piece of advice...if you don't like it here in Britain, then you can always go home!
You managed to get here...now's your chance to return to a better life and who knows...the abusive husband, might have changed his ways?
They are not illegal immigrants. :-)
And if you are one fo the 'ethnic Brits' who want to get away - please leave! I'll sleep happier in my bed tonight, thinking that people like you, who talk of 'third world rubbish' are gone.
Wonder who'll take you 'tho? Even South America is a bit dodgy on 'ethnic Brit' immigration lately...
We have changed language to disguise our behaviour. We call them asylum seekers, not refugees. It makes it easier to not ask what they are seeking refuge from. We presume that failed asylum seekers have had fair and equitable treatment by our legal system, and not the kangaroo court administrative system which has raised the bar so high that it is a miracle that any applications are ever accepted.
We accept the lies told daily by ministers and officials. Even though dozens of people from high to low, peers to ordinary people, including paediatricians, doctors, lawyers (not just asylum lawyers), MP's MEP's and not just the English, but the Scottish and Welsh Children's Commissioners, plus HM Inspector of Prisons, have all, from direct visits, and documentary evidence including the actual medical reports from Yarlswood, incomplete though they have often been, and medical histories prior to and after Yarlswood, have all told the same story of abusive and neglectful treatment. Not to mention the evidence in a number of court cases where the Judges comments have been damning in the extreme.
But the government continues to deny that anything is wrong. And nothing is done.
Why? Because the laws governing asylum seekers and detention centres have been written, and continue to be amended, so as to remove the entire system from normal UK law.
I am really afraid though because people like chappel, who I cannot believe ever worked at Yarlswood, have a mentality that believes the lies, even whilst working inside the system. I have met others, who can tell you lies are truth with absolute sincerity.
We have destroyed the normal legal system in this country as far as asylum seekers is concerned, perhaps beyond repair. We see similar removals of the checks and balances that were put in place over hundreds of years, in the cases of alleged children at risk, where the allegation itself is enough to take the most drastic action, rightly or wrongly. We see it in the cases of 'terrorists', few of whom are ever convicted. Where else are we going to see it? Where do we draw the line in the sand. Because our continuing failure to treat asylum seekers, especially children as young as four weeks, with compassion, dignity, and a reasonable right to such basics as medical treatment, appropriate food, and access to proper play and educational facilities, says that as a country we are already on a slippery slope.
If I hear that there has been a fire at the houses of Parliament, and the government has introduced emergency legislation, then all my worst fears will have become real.
Some pupils I taught several years ago were removed to YW. When we phoned and badgered I was told that education was provided, but speaking to one of them her response was consonant with the picture painted here.
We cannot feel high minded about US treatment of detainees when we still have this.
And bodies like Manchester City Council are happy to farm out their Aquatic Centre to Serco. Shame!
As for the inhumane treatment these people have suffered, the British population would be up in arms, calling for immediate end to this treatment, if it were animals being so abused! It is an utter disgrace that it has been allowed to go on for so long.
Knucle draggers the lot of them!!!!
There are those among us who would sympathize with even bin laden or the devil himself should they apply for asylum. In a democracy however the majority rules and there is no doubt in my mind that they do NOT want these people here.!