UK

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Journey into the age of the 140mph train

Kevin Rawlinson boards the locomotive that's set to revolutionise the daily commute

 The new Javelin trains travel at speeds ofupto 140mph and will cut journey times on many routes from St Pancras to towns throughout Kent

WILL WINTERCROSS

The new Javelin trains travel at speeds ofupto 140mph and will cut journey times on many routes from St Pancras to towns throughout Kent

Travellers on a morning rail service from Ashford in Kent to central London might have been forgiven for thinking they had been transported to another country yesterday.

For a start, there was space – lots of it. No more cheek-by-jowl commuting here; there were even spare seats. And then there was the speed. Rather than the usual stopping and starting, on this train you could hardly see the countryside as it whizzed by. "I'm used to having enough time to get settled and have a look through the papers – I'd only managed a page or two before it was time to get off," said one passenger.

Welcome to the future of British rail travel. This was the first high-speed "Javelin" train to rocket down the new St Pancras-Ashford line at speeds of up to 140mph. Rail operator Southeastern began running previews of the service yesterday, which will slash journey times by as much as 43 minutes by using the same high-speed lines as Eurostar.

But there is a catch. Passengers will have to pay more than they would do for slower journeys. A single fare from London to Ebbsfleet on the Javelin trains costs £12.20 instead of the usual £9.10, while London to Ashford will go up from £22.20 to £26.60.

Southeastern will not launch its full marketing campaign for the service until early next month, meaning those in the know so far are enjoying a little extra legroom – and overcrowding may yet return. Southeastern said a possible 200 extra trains a day could be running from December.

While yesterday's maiden service arrived at St Pancras one minute early, this being Britain, there were a few teething troubles. One elderly passenger was forced to buy a "16-25 years" ticket after the machine refused to dispense anything else.

The first passengers also warned that others may need to bring their sea legs. The Hitachi-manufactured train appeared to sway from side to side, unlike conventional rolling stock, which could lead to intimate situations as the trains fill up.

Vince Lucas, commercial director of Southeastern which operates the line, said: "This preview service is aimed at ironing out any creases that may exist. Around £5.8bn has been spent on laying and upgrading the track and we need to know about those mundane problems which routinely slow passengers down now, before we start running a full service in December."

Charles Horton, managing director of Southeastern, said, "While it is an important day for the industry as a whole, we have been careful to not lose sight of who it is really for – the passengers."

Andrew John, a 45-year-old chartered engineer, said of the new service: "I can get from St Pancras to Kent quicker than some Londoners can get about on the Tube."

There will be 29 of the trains in operation from December 2009. At present, the Javelins are only running as far as Ashford, but by the end of the year they will help reduce journey times to towns all over Kent from London. St Pancras to Canterbury will take 59 minutes, Folkestone 57 minutes and Ramsgate 80 minutes.

In 2012, the Javelin trains will also take spectators from St Pancras to the Olympics site at Stratford, east London, in only seven minutes.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

A good PR exercise - nothing else
[info]andygb wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 07:45 am (UTC)


So, with rising costs all around, and the associated risk to jobs, who is able to afford the new high speed link? Who will be involved in the morning scrum to get to St Pancras? Most of the people who commute to London from Kent, work in the City, Docklands or West End. I don't think that I would be very happy to have to pay for tube travel on top of an already expensive fare, it kind of defeats the object really.
26.60 Single! How much??????
[info]robertclondon wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 07:50 am (UTC)
So this is the future of British railways:

1) Advances delayed by years;
2) Trains manufactured abroad, because we don't know how any more;
3) Not affordable by anyone on a normal income;
4) Piecemeal, unplanned approach that leaves many people with worse services not better ones.
5) Decades behind our European competitors and falling further behind.
London-Edinburgh had 140 mph trains in 1990
[info]old_green wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 09:08 am (UTC)
Nationalised railways were so much cheaper and more efficient.

You note that the new 140 mph railway required government finance to make it happen - this wasn't a private enterprise project.

The electification and upgrading of the London-Edinburgh line only cost 400 million including the trains.
Right
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 09:38 am (UTC)
So Kent has decent trains, everyone else has high fares to pay for it. Still it means our railway system is less embarrassing to the Europeans who may arrive by ferry or tunnel and who will no longer be greeted by our third world rail system, though it is still overpriced.
Kent does in fact NOT have decent trains
[info]cirkux wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 11:27 am (UTC)
I live in Thanet and commute by train to work in Maidstone. Our train service will be more expensive, slower (as the new trains can't run at speed on the old rails between Ashford and Thanet), and as part of the financing they will cancel a few departures on the current timetable. Personally I will not benefit from the quick route to London and will in fact be paying more for worse service and this is apparently meant to constitute progress.
I'd be more than content if Southeastern could just manage to deliver the original service reliably.
high speed trains are not the solution
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 11:39 am (UTC)
High speed trains waste a fortune which could be spent on improving the everyday running of our trains. They also just shift people from place to place faster, which means local areas are not served, and jobs in the local area are taken by those who live within the fast train jouney ride area. (See Winchester for how this creates a two-tier social-situation with poverty next to well-off London workers living in all the best areas). Fast trains in a small island like th UK are not the way forward, just a 'toys for the boys' solution'. when are we going to get real improvements to services, instead of cuts in operating company staff, abandoned ticket ofices and empty stations, and simultaneous immoral bonuses for network rail board members who have done nothing but survive in their jobs to deserve them, while laying off their own staff.
German Railways
[info]dem1972 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 02:30 pm (UTC)
German Railways (Deutsche Bahn) charge a premium for travelling on their Intercity Express (ICE) trains; however, despite what you might think, there are only a few routes in Germany that exceed 200 km/h (125 mph) so you don't necessarily pay for high speed routes. Rail travellers in Germany whine as much if not more about their services and cost so there really isn't a way to keep everyone happy.
Having said all that it is amusing the read the whining comments about prices going up; it is a premium service so you should pay more, you ultimately have a choice: fast rail, slow rail, drive, or move closer to where you work. Additionally to those who say it is a waste of money, this is not the prevailing thought in those countries that have extensive high speed routes, so the suggestion should be to provide more routes, wait ten years, and then review your opinions.
High Speed Trains
[info]elcansino wrote:
Wednesday, 1 July 2009 at 05:04 am (UTC)
Trains better and faster than the Javelin (I lived in Japan for 8 years) are made in Europe and they have been used in a wide variety of terrains for many years. Buying them from Japan shows a lack of solidarity

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date