UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 7° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Royal Navy witnessed Somali pirates kidnap British couple

By Lewis Smith

A photograph taken around last June of Rachel and Paul Chandler who were captured on their yacht in the Indian Ocean last week

Handout/PA Wire

Paul and Rachel Chandler, who were hijacked by pirates in their yacht

The kidnapping of a British couple by Somali pirates was witnessed by the crew of a Royal Navy ship who held their fire while the hijackers escaped, it emerged yesterday.

Paul and Rachel Chandler were bundled from their yacht near the Seychelles on to a motorised launch as the RFA Wave Knight approached but the Navy was unable to open fire for fear of killing the couple.

The admission by the Ministry of Defence that a Royal Navy ship was at the scene during the hijacking conflicted with an earlier statement which suggested the couple's yacht was found by HMS Cumberland empty some time after they had been seized. HMS Cumberland was the nearest warship to the scene but was two hours' away from the hijack, whereas the Wave Knight was close enough to see what was going on.

The MoD agreed it had been "economical with the truth" but maintained that it kept quiet about the true course of events for operational reasons during a "hijack situation".

Once in the launch the Chandlers were surrounded by pirates, making it impossible for the Navy vessel to open fire without risking the lives of the British couple, the MoD claimed.

The crowded launch took the couple to the pirates' mother ship, the previously hijacked container vessel Kota Wajara, while the crew of the Wave Knight attempted unsuccessfully to head them off. Some reports suggested that the Royal Fleet Auxiliary vessel managed to get within 50 feet of the pirates.

The Wave Knight was crewed by 25 Royal Navy personnel and 75 merchant seamen but, while equipped with a helicopter, has only limited weaponry which is intended for defence.

The MoD was anxious yesterday to play down expectations that the crew of the RFA vessel should have taken on the pirates.

A spokesman said: "Everything was done with the safety of the Chandlers in mind. We do not comment on operational detail but RFA Wave Knight did very well under the circumstances."

The MoD said that the couple were already in the hands of the pirates when the RFA vessel was close enough to see what was happening.

The Chandlers were kidnapped on 23 October as they sailed from the Seychelles towards Tanzania. They are thought to have been taken to a mainland base in Somalia by pirates who have demanded a $7m (£4.2m) ransom. The pirates have threatened to kill the couple if their demands are not met, though there are suggestions that they might want to organise a prisoner exchange, swapping the Chandlers for a group of pirates who were arrested by an EU warship on anti-piracy patrol off the Somali coast.

After seeing the ransom report, the Foreign Office said the Government would not make any "substantive concessions to hostage-takers, and that includes the payment of ransom". A spokesman added: "We are monitoring the situation closely. Foreign Office staff are in close contact with the family and offering support."

Figures released by the International Maritime Bureau showed that pirate attacks worldwide in 2009 have already exceeded the total for 2008, which itself was a record year for piracy. The majority of the attacks are attributed to Somalis.

A multinational force of warships has done little to deter the pirates, whose attacks are increasingly frequent and brazen. There have been at least 163 attacks so far in 2009, 47 of which were successful. At least eight ships and more than 150 crew members are being held.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

a laughing stock
[info]tph197 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 03:52 am (UTC)
The Royal Navy, once feared for its bravery and savagery, has become a laughing stock. The Labour Party is now beginning to corrupt even the armed forces. Is there no end to there damage these degenerate scum in the Labour Party will do, before they are thrown on the garbage heap where they belong?
Re: a laughing stock
[info]linseysdawn wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 11:53 am (UTC)
It's got sod all to do with the Labour Party.
If you have legitimate complaints then stick to them.

Talk about irrelevant.
Re: a laughing stock
[info]tph197 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 01:09 pm (UTC)
Whom do you think formulates the rules of engagement? Whom do you think has been putting their placemen into the MOD corrupting it beyond repair. The Left, using Entryism, have corrupted the integrity of the judiciary, civil service, local government, councils, social services, the BBC and police; they have even made a start on the armed forces. This corruption has been justified in the name of a spurious ethic of equality; a rag-bag of single issues assembled to replace the morality, roughly Christian in character, which served us so well. One of the first tasks of a Tory administration will be to restore this integrity. This may be achieved by removing the vast army of enforcers from the public payroll and the stripping out all offending legislation. The days of authoritarian government are drawing to a close; failure to recognise this fact, will in future, render those political parties unelectable.
Pirate kidnapping
[info]libertarian09 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 04:15 am (UTC)
Is that what Lord Nelson would have done?
Pathetic
[info]tovasco wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 06:00 am (UTC)
Unreal, lets hope the next time there is an Iranian gunboat handy.
[info]doug_piranha wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 08:13 am (UTC)
how can you blame the government - get a grip !

Scared of hurting someone ? So they let a bunch of muderous thugs kidnap two people.
So, they are safe now are they ? They could be shot at any minute - and the Navy maintain
it was better to let them be kidnapped than try to prevent this.

Last time the Navy hit the headlines was having a small naval boat ( and crew ) kidnapped.
Sounds like Dad's Armey - not the Royal Navy

what exaclty is the navy for then ??
it can't even protect people from a rag-tag group in a small boat.
Rule Britannia.
[info]auntyeunice wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 08:51 am (UTC)
Silly old Captain, he could have earned himself a MoD bonus if he has offered the pirates asylum and a free council house each in Britain. He might even have got the Chandlers back too., but I suppose that's by the by.
What happened to chivalry?
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 09:05 am (UTC)
'Wave Knight' would seem to be about the most inappropriate name ever given to this ship. The one thing it is not is a Knight of the waves - no chance of this 'fair maiden' being rescued from the evil clutches of the 'Black Knight'. Can we rename it HMS Blackadder or HMS Baldrick?
Navy is no match for Pirates
[info]pippadog wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 10:38 am (UTC)
A RN war ship, 75 merchant seamen and 25 armed RN Personel, how can this possibly be a match for 5 or 6 lighly armed pirates? They can only watch (from a distance of course) in case their action may harm the Chandlers. As a result the Chandlers are now enjoying a free stay in sunny Somalia!
One can well understand why they kept hush about this one.
Get Real The Lot Of You
[info]theelectrician wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 11:21 am (UTC)
"They didn't do anything!", "They should have done something!"

Seriously, if any of you were the RN commander on the Wave Knight, what would you have done?
Let's hear how you would have saved the Chandlers from the pirates (while ensuring they were not killed or seriously injured).

You have the benefit of hindsight and there are no time constraints on you to come up with a daring scheme to save and rescue them. Well.....what would you have done?
Re: Get Real The Lot Of You
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
How about replace the entire crew with personnel from the Marine nationale. England nowadays does not seem to expect that every man will do his duty - and should merely roll over like a big fat pussycat and whinge about I-pods. Low expectations tend to generate low performance.
Tactics need improving
[info]prof_use wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 01:21 pm (UTC)
Don't the navy have a means of snarling the propellors of the little boats? I could design one if they are short of ideas. If they threaten to shoot the couple from their crippled boat then negotiations can start, the boat is no longer moving and now provides the navy boat with the upper hand.

I question the tactics that are used against the pirates
RFA Wave Knight
[info]catnap007 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 01:44 pm (UTC)
An RFA (Royal Fleet Auxiliary) is not a warship and does not have the right personnel on board to carry out a boarding. The civilians cannot be called upon to do this and the service personnel are all aircrew and helicopter maintenance staff. The most they could have done is get a helicopter airborne and sunk or damaged the pirate craft. This would have resulted in the deaths of the pirates but also unacceptably lead to the deaths of the couple. What a great headline.... Royal Navy machineguns and sinks Somali pirate boat and kills British couple…..Given the task and circumstances, what would you do?
Re: RFA Wave Knight
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 02:42 pm (UTC)
So, in a hijack situation, if civilian personnel are not allowed to do anything and service personnel can't do anything, it makes you wonder why this ship is there at all. Is it there just to give the illusion of 'protection'?
Re: RFA Wave Knight
[info]catnap007 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 03:29 pm (UTC)
There is no political will at present to attack these pirates BEFORE they engage in a pirate attack. The Royal Navy (and other navies) can only persue the pirates after they have committed an act of piracy. As for RFA Wave Knight, it's primary purpose is to provide fuel to our warships. It's a tanker not a warship. It does have limited upper deck weapons for self protection and has used them in previous engagements, Please read the following:
http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-events/rn-live/all-news/rfa-wave-knight-disrupts-pirate-attacks/*/changeNav/3533/noRedirect/1

Re: RFA Wave Knight
[info]alan_honiton wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 04:06 pm (UTC)
Thank you for that information. Actually I knew the Wave Knight was a fast fleet tanker, but it is still part of the fleet and commanded by Royal Naval personnel. But you have hit the nail on the head - the lack of political will. The RN has been emasculated by this Labour government, which evidently contrains RN officers from exercising any Nelsonian initiative. Evidently someone aboard was embarrassed enough to leak the story to the press, which contradicted an earlier press release which initially failed to even mention the Wave Knight. I do have sympathy for the crew - they should not be placed in impossible positions by duplicitous politicians.
Re: RFA Wave Knight
[info]catnap007 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 04:32 pm (UTC)
Don't worry Alan....the limp wristed hand wringing lefties who have so corrupted our Institutions will be thrown on the scrapheap of history in a few months time.
a laughing stock
[info]pauljean1 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 04:20 pm (UTC)
has anyone thought it might be either against health and safety or the pirates human rights the long arm of the pc brigade is very ,very long yah know.
Re: a laughing stock
[info]mikeyg67 wrote:
Sunday, 15 November 2009 at 01:03 pm (UTC)
The rules of engagement for RFA Wave Knight are very clear. Search for what Wave Knight achieved mid April earlier this year.
Pirates
[info]robertb1 wrote:
Saturday, 14 November 2009 at 11:55 pm (UTC)
How could the british navy do anything. They have not done anything in a century without the Americans being behind them. They were lucky that the boers did not have a navy. Any "battles" the british won in WW2 were at odds of 100 to 1 in favour and the Soviets were on the ourskirts of Warsaw berore the Americans (with some British involvment) re-crossed the Channel. What I would do is to sweep the coust of somalia and sink any ships big enough to be a "mother ship.
Holiday hotspot?
[info]leedsman wrote:
Wednesday, 18 November 2009 at 01:41 pm (UTC)
Is there any country worse than Somalia? Really? All this kind of stuff.. regular stonings (another one today)...

I do spend a lot of energy bitching about the UK, but sometimes you look at a place, take stock of things and think that really we're pretty lucky, despite everything. Here's hoping the couple are returned to safety and that we find a way to help Somalia out of it's seemingly never-ending crisis.
Ashamed to be Somali
[info]abshir98 wrote:
Saturday, 21 November 2009 at 01:17 pm (UTC)
Originally from Somalia but the left the country around 1990 before the civil war. I currently live in the US - Washington DC and REALLY very very sorry and upset what's happening in Somalia. The Pirates capturing and hijacking British civilians vacationing to enjoy their retirement is beyond my imagination. Enough is Enough. My heart goes with to Paul and Rachel Chandler's families and hope they are released unharmed and safe return soon.
What would I do???
[info]rjslocum wrote:
Sunday, 22 November 2009 at 02:20 pm (UTC)
I have been cruising on my british-flagged schooner for 29 years. Right now my vesel is in Thailand, about ready to cross the Indian Ocean for the second time. I know small boats.

From what I understand, the Wave Knight was shadowing the mother ship (hijacked container ship) for some time after firing across its bow, and knew that it was heading in the direction of the Chandlers yacht. Apparently it even knew when it left Somalia. Plenty of time – much more than enough time – to decide what to do. To make a plan. If the rules of engagement do now allow a naval ship to fire on pirates unless fired upon (ridiculous in the extreme, but if those are the “rules”, then those are the rules), you get your own tender ready to lower into the water at the first sight of the Chandler’s vessel, which would have been clearly visible from at least 10 miles away. Your fast tender with about 15 armed men then gets between the chandlers dinghy and the mother ship, or whatever boat the pirates are using to transfer the chandlers to the mother ship, preventing that boat from reaching the mother ship. If the pirates open fire, you fire on the pirates at close range from your tender. If you have to sink the small boat, you do it, then pick everyone out of the warm water. Easy to overturn a pirate skiff with a larger tender. Even easier to sink an inflatable dinghy with a couple of knife slashes if that’s what the pirates were using.

The navy was lying when it said that it did everything it could. The naval office was lying when it said that the Wave Knight did the best it could under the circumstances. The cowardice and ineptitude of the captain of the Wave Knight is truly sickening. If the reason given for the failure of the crew of and captain to act was that the crew were civilians who weren’t willing to risk their lives, then they shouldn’t have been out there wasting taxpayers money.

Disgusted in paradise.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date