Saved from the death squads: Darfuris given asylum in UK
Government backtracks after refugee was executed on his return to Sudan
Hundreds of Darfuris fleeing persecution in Sudan will be given protection in Britain after a government U-turn on its handling of asylum claims brought by refugees from the troubled African state.
The change of policy follows mounting evidence that non-Arab asylum seekers returned to Sudan face arrest, torture and death at the hands of the Arab militias and security services. In one case, highlighted by The Independent earlier this year, a Darfuri man repatriated to Khartoum was executed after government officers followed him to his village in the south of the region.
Under the new policy, released without announcement on Monday by the Home Office, all non-Arab Darfuris will qualify for asylum. The decision was welcomed by the Darfuri community in the UK, many of whom have been living under the threat of deportation.
Mariam Suliman, 30, a doctor from Darfur, and her husband, Sideeq Sharaf, 32, a science student, fled the state after their village was attacked by Arab militias who were supported by the Khartoum government.
Mrs Suliman, who came to the UK in 2000, said they were delighted by the decision, saying: "It means we can be a family again." She added: "For many Darfurian victims who escaped the place of dying, and were waiting for a long time to get their refugee status, this will be a huge benefit.
"It's the end of frustration, depression, hopelessness and despair which has been [created by] the long waiting. Darfuris will be able to study and work and contribute to [the] economy and integrate to the community."
Under the new policy, asylum-seekers will be given the right to stay for up to five years, or until the political situation improves. The conflict in Darfur is regarded by the United Nations as one of the worst humanitarian disasters in the world. It is estimated that 300,000 people have died in the conflict and more than 2.5 million have been forced to flee the region.
After monitoring the situation, the Home Office instructed its lawyers to withdraw opposition to appeals brought by all non-Arab Darfuris, who had been forced to go to court to prove that their lives would be in danger if they were sent home. A test case due to be heard later this month has been abandoned.
Louise Roland-Gosselin, group director of Waging Peace, a charity which has campaigned for more protection for the people of Darfur, said: "After years of waiting, all Darfuris in the UK who can prove their ethnicity will be given asylum status. This is likely to affect over 500 Darfuris... many of these have been waiting up to four years for a decision on their asylum status."
Khatir Kayabil, general secretary of the Darfur Union, also welcomed the decision: "So many of our members have been living in limbo for years. Now we can start to rebuild our lives here."
Matthew Coats, head of immigration at the UK Border Authority, said: "The Government takes its international responsibilities seriously and we will grant protection to those Sudanese nationals that need it. We will continue to consider each application for protection on its individual merits.
"We will always seek to remove from the UK those who do not need our protection and who have no right to remain here. We will monitor the situation in Sudan very carefully and will review our policy as and when new information becomes available."
Asylum-seekers: Campaign for justice
17 March 2009 Failed asylum-seeker Adam Osman Mohammed, 32, is deported by the UK Government and flown back to Khartoum. After leaving the airport, he is followed home to his village in the south of the region and shot in front of his family by Sudan security officials.
7 July 2008 The charity Waging Peace and The Independent highlight a secret U-turn by which the Home Office lifted the ban on returning Darfuri asylum seekers to Khartoum.
2 October 2007 At the Labour Party conference, Gordon Brown promises to stand up for those being persecuted in Burma, Darfur and Zimbabwe, saying "human rights are universal". But the Home Office continues to reject applications from refugees, becoming embroiled in protracted court battles to enable the enforced removals of both Zimbabweans and Darfuris.
13 April 2007 Human rights campaigners claim that the Home Office is collaborating with the Sudanese government to question asylum seekers fleeing the violence in Darfur.
500
The number of asylum-seekers expected to benefit from the ministerial ruling.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited



Comments
But then there are xenophobic bigots everywhere these days.
Come on people, times might be a bit financially tough, but when was the last time you actually starved and watched your child die from malnutrition and thirst. No, it's not your fault that their government is corrupt, but it's not theirs either. A biological accident meant that you were born in Britain, they weren't. You don't deserve to live more than them. Show a modicum of humanity for your fellow human beings. There are bigger issues to worry about than public spending. No person should live their life in fear of what some asylum seekers have experienced.
You sound like a walking cliche for the BNP to be honest, immigration and asylum are two different things and we have been protecting people for generations in this manner.
I have seen this very thing though first hand, when I was based in Hong Kong, there were large camps full of Vietnamese boat people, shoulder to shoulder and held in atrocious conditions but it didn't matter being out of sight of the mainland media, these were periodically herded onto planes and sent back to Vietnam and many were imprisoned in gulag conditions on their arrival and some were put to death. Men, women or children... it didn't matter as long as they were made "examples" of...
I am sorry but I cannot call myself a man of conscience and say at the same time it is acceptable to send these people back to their deaths.
"This is likely to affect over 500 Darfuris..."
I have lived in some of the darker areas of B'ham (and very good curry shops they had too). Yes, they had their problems. Yes, I was burgled. But stand up, be proud, and look around you.
OK, I do not live in London (well, I cannot actually live everywhere) so I cannot comment on Peckham High Street. But where I live now was the last place in England to have the Riot Act read, and had the first ASBO too. And that was all white, by the way.
You are, frankly, writing rubbish. I hope you get over it
soon.
I hope you find some help with your problems.
Bill
"This is likely to affect over 500 Darfuris..."