UK

Showers (AM and PM) 10° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Saved from the death squads: Darfuris given asylum in UK

Government backtracks after refugee was executed on his return to Sudan

By Robert Verkaik, Home Affairs Editor

Hundreds of Darfuris fleeing persecution in Sudan will be given protection in Britain after a government U-turn on its handling of asylum claims brought by refugees from the troubled African state.

The change of policy follows mounting evidence that non-Arab asylum seekers returned to Sudan face arrest, torture and death at the hands of the Arab militias and security services. In one case, highlighted by The Independent earlier this year, a Darfuri man repatriated to Khartoum was executed after government officers followed him to his village in the south of the region.

Under the new policy, released without announcement on Monday by the Home Office, all non-Arab Darfuris will qualify for asylum. The decision was welcomed by the Darfuri community in the UK, many of whom have been living under the threat of deportation.

Mariam Suliman, 30, a doctor from Darfur, and her husband, Sideeq Sharaf, 32, a science student, fled the state after their village was attacked by Arab militias who were supported by the Khartoum government.

Mrs Suliman, who came to the UK in 2000, said they were delighted by the decision, saying: "It means we can be a family again." She added: "For many Darfurian victims who escaped the place of dying, and were waiting for a long time to get their refugee status, this will be a huge benefit.

"It's the end of frustration, depression, hopelessness and despair which has been [created by] the long waiting. Darfuris will be able to study and work and contribute to [the] economy and integrate to the community."

Under the new policy, asylum-seekers will be given the right to stay for up to five years, or until the political situation improves. The conflict in Darfur is regarded by the United Nations as one of the worst humanitarian disasters in the world. It is estimated that 300,000 people have died in the conflict and more than 2.5 million have been forced to flee the region.

After monitoring the situation, the Home Office instructed its lawyers to withdraw opposition to appeals brought by all non-Arab Darfuris, who had been forced to go to court to prove that their lives would be in danger if they were sent home. A test case due to be heard later this month has been abandoned.

Louise Roland-Gosselin, group director of Waging Peace, a charity which has campaigned for more protection for the people of Darfur, said: "After years of waiting, all Darfuris in the UK who can prove their ethnicity will be given asylum status. This is likely to affect over 500 Darfuris... many of these have been waiting up to four years for a decision on their asylum status."

Khatir Kayabil, general secretary of the Darfur Union, also welcomed the decision: "So many of our members have been living in limbo for years. Now we can start to rebuild our lives here."

Matthew Coats, head of immigration at the UK Border Authority, said: "The Government takes its international responsibilities seriously and we will grant protection to those Sudanese nationals that need it. We will continue to consider each application for protection on its individual merits.

"We will always seek to remove from the UK those who do not need our protection and who have no right to remain here. We will monitor the situation in Sudan very carefully and will review our policy as and when new information becomes available."

Asylum-seekers: Campaign for justice

17 March 2009 Failed asylum-seeker Adam Osman Mohammed, 32, is deported by the UK Government and flown back to Khartoum. After leaving the airport, he is followed home to his village in the south of the region and shot in front of his family by Sudan security officials.

7 July 2008 The charity Waging Peace and The Independent highlight a secret U-turn by which the Home Office lifted the ban on returning Darfuri asylum seekers to Khartoum.

2 October 2007 At the Labour Party conference, Gordon Brown promises to stand up for those being persecuted in Burma, Darfur and Zimbabwe, saying "human rights are universal". But the Home Office continues to reject applications from refugees, becoming embroiled in protracted court battles to enable the enforced removals of both Zimbabweans and Darfuris.

13 April 2007 Human rights campaigners claim that the Home Office is collaborating with the Sudanese government to question asylum seekers fleeing the violence in Darfur.

500

The number of asylum-seekers expected to benefit from the ministerial ruling.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Darfuris
[info]gwilymrj wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 07:34 am (UTC)
Lucky for them if not for him. Fling the doors open there's plenty of room and money for everybody.
Re: Darfuris
[info]geo32 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:52 pm (UTC)
It is amazing the lengths some people will go to to prove a point

a martyr?
[info]sameen wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 08:17 am (UTC)
Finally an immigration decision not bounded by political expediency
Umm
[info]deolenitpikka wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 08:58 am (UTC)
Most of the "Darfuris" I come across have very recently issued Sudanese passports and strong Nigerian accents. How will it be possible to define who is and who is not 'Darfuri'?
Good for gov't, shame on the media
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 09:11 am (UTC)
... that the gov’t felt it had to do this in private.

But then there are xenophobic bigots everywhere these days.
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media
[info]lisas_cat wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
Indeed, as several of the comments above and below make shamefully clear. No matter how terrible they might consider multi-culturalism, however awful they think the overcrowded roads are going to get, whatever assumptions they make about the drain on the public purse of benefit claims for immigrants, life in Britain, or America for that matter, is never as bad as fearing for your life and your children's lives because you disagree with or differ in ancestry from the government. Peckham High Street might be crowded, but you're not about to be ethnically cleansed and watch your whole family raped and mutilated.

Come on people, times might be a bit financially tough, but when was the last time you actually starved and watched your child die from malnutrition and thirst. No, it's not your fault that their government is corrupt, but it's not theirs either. A biological accident meant that you were born in Britain, they weren't. You don't deserve to live more than them. Show a modicum of humanity for your fellow human beings. There are bigger issues to worry about than public spending. No person should live their life in fear of what some asylum seekers have experienced.
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media
[info]britishlion1 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:18 pm (UTC)
maybe so lisa's cat but to read about our own hard working citizens getting raped and mugged by the dregs of society that travel through a wide range of countries to get here is the big issue here. We have our own homeless people on the streets abused by the families and on your thinking should we really take on the worlds poor and homeless when we can not look after the citizens of britain. We do not work 50 hours a week to pay our taxes to subsidise the corruption in the East. The Big Issue raises money by selling magazines on the street, the NSPCC have to beg for money they do not get millions off the government. So is it better to open the door to all and sundry while the homeless and abused that were born in england get nothing...
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media
[info]ancientoneuk wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:57 pm (UTC)
As it happens the NSPCC get quite a lot of money from the government...

You sound like a walking cliche for the BNP to be honest, immigration and asylum are two different things and we have been protecting people for generations in this manner.

I have seen this very thing though first hand, when I was based in Hong Kong, there were large camps full of Vietnamese boat people, shoulder to shoulder and held in atrocious conditions but it didn't matter being out of sight of the mainland media, these were periodically herded onto planes and sent back to Vietnam and many were imprisoned in gulag conditions on their arrival and some were put to death. Men, women or children... it didn't matter as long as they were made "examples" of...

I am sorry but I cannot call myself a man of conscience and say at the same time it is acceptable to send these people back to their deaths.
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media
[info]gwilymrj wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 09:41 pm (UTC)
Peckham is heading that way, you buffoon, and Africa is Africa's problem not ours.
Darfur Immigration
[info]britishlion1 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 10:05 am (UTC)
What is hard to understand that if Darfur is so bad then go to Egypt , Isreal, Saudi , Turkey, Greece, Italy, France and then England..come on people is someone saying that all the other places are terrible to live in and we should look after everyone in africa because it is so hard to live there ? We send millions over in aid every year , the government is corrupt and is it our fault? Is it the fault of your children who will have to put up with an overpopulated britain in 10 years time. What are you going to do when the roads are more overcrowded, tax is at 50% due to the cost of looking after the jobless and homeless. There is going to be a huge cost to all this immigration to every single hard working person in this country. Those on benefits will not feel a thing, when will we wake up and smell the stench.
Re: Darfur Immigration
[info]pozac wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 10:39 am (UTC)
A few did in 1776 (or a little before) but even here it seems to me that that the US is well on its way to being just like the UK...a one world government eventually...or ever how long it takes.
Re: Darfur Immigration
[info]almightymat wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 12:58 pm (UTC)

"This is likely to affect over 500 Darfuris..."
Good for gov't, shame on the media . Bill Davy
[info]britishlion1 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 10:58 am (UTC)
well enjoy shopping down peckham high street then as it is completly invaded by immigration. Didnt see many of the white leberal lefties shopping there.
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media . Bill Davy
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC)
Do you really consider yourself a "British lion"? Frankly, that seems rather silly to me.

I have lived in some of the darker areas of B'ham (and very good curry shops they had too). Yes, they had their problems. Yes, I was burgled. But stand up, be proud, and look around you.

OK, I do not live in London (well, I cannot actually live everywhere) so I cannot comment on Peckham High Street. But where I live now was the last place in England to have the Riot Act read, and had the first ASBO too. And that was all white, by the way.
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media . Bill Davy
[info]britishlion1 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 12:48 pm (UTC)
Hi Bill , unfortunatley that is how this country has become..whats good for the goose, when we live in a benefit run society and we have aspirations of getting a council house and living off the state. Immigrants get a lot for nothing, and unfortunatley we have people in this country that want the same and think they deserve a living. Council Estates the length and bredth of this country is teaming with aggresive good for nothings. As we have no money left in our coffers to spend on policing and reducing overall crime. We have criminals from all over the world abusing our system and illegally entering this country. I dont like workshy dossers regardless of race. We should have capital punishment for criminals and get all the unemployed working for thier benefits. 20 hours a week should cover it , doing a bit of community service then they have the rest of the week to find a job.. As we all know you need to have a job to find a job.
Re: Good for gov't, shame on the media . Bill Davy
[info]billdavy1949 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:04 pm (UTC)
I would suggest that you do not need political reform but an anger management course.

You are, frankly, writing rubbish. I hope you get over it
soon.

I hope you find some help with your problems.

Bill
Immirgration do we know it is not a scam
[info]repton4 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 01:47 pm (UTC)
Why don't we just let everyone in to this country, Oh sorry we do, What a load of old crap theses human rights muppets spout, Why not look after the human rights of the British people for a change w we have legal and illegal immigrants in this country who have killed, and raped and are walking around this country because we can not deport them because of there human rights
Re: Immirgration do we know it is not a scam
[info]almightymat wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 12:58 pm (UTC)

"This is likely to affect over 500 Darfuris..."

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date