Welcome to the new Independent website. We hope you enjoy it and we value your feedback. Please contact us here.

Teacher clears name over pupil harassment allegation

Cumbria police refusal to remove unfounded claim from 'criminal record certificate' is ruled a breach of his right to private life

A teacher whose career was destroyed after he was accused of harassing an 18-year-old pupil won the right to clear his record today.

A High Court judge ruled that Cumbria Police had unlawfully infringed the 44-year-old's human rights by refusing to remove details of the unfounded allegation from a "criminal record certificate" available to potential employers.

Mr Justice Stuart-Smith, in a written ruling, accused police of a "disproportionate and unjustifiable" breach of the teacher's right to private life - enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

Police had investigated the complaint and concluded that "no further action" should be taken, yet the disclosure of the allegation had dealt a "killer blow" to the teacher's employment prospects, said the judge.

The court heard that the teenager, a pupil at the school where he taught physical education, had made the accusation in 2010. She said that, having bumped into her in a pub, he had "hugged me... and pressed my chest to him four or five times".

She also alleged that the teacher, who cannot be named for legal reasons, had whispered: "I want you to come round to mine - two hours - £200 every month." He denied "having spoken to or even seen" her and police concluded that "no further action" should be taken for the "offence of 'harassment-sexual touching'."

He left the school but when he applied for a post as a supply teacher months later a member of staff at the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB), contacted the investigating officer PC Anita Owen. In a later CRB request, the officer suggested she believed the teenager's allegation and that he was guilty. Michelle Skeer - then assistant chief constable - subsequently authorised Enhanced Criminal Record Certificate disclosure, said the judge.

Mr Justice Stuart-Smith said: "It was entirely foreseeable that disclosure in the terms made would be a killer blow to (the teacher's) prospects of employment, and so it has proved to be."