UK

11° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Tony Blair's penal policy condemned – by Cherie

Commission headed by QC attacks 'dumping' of addicts and mentally ill prisoners

By Robert Verkaik, Home Affairs Editor

Inmates at HMP Pentonville in north London. A review headed by Cherie Booth QC concludes that Britain's prisons have become 'warehouses' where prisoners are 'dumped'

Getty

Inmates at HMP Pentonville in north London. A review headed by Cherie Booth QC concludes that Britain's prisons have become 'warehouses' where prisoners are 'dumped'

Labour's flagship policies on criminal justice have brought about a crisis in the prison system, a group of leading penal reformers headed by Cherie Booth QC has concluded.

In a radical report, the Commission on English Prisons Today calls for the closure of many prisons and a new direction in sentencing.

The commission said that the National Offenders Management Service (Noms), established five years ago after a review led by Tony Blair's office, was "ineffective" and should be dismantled.

Noms, which brings together the management of prisons and probation, was also attacked as "unwieldy" and "over-complex".

Instead, the commission, set up two years ago by the Howard League for Prison Reform, said the emphasis should be on imprisoning offenders locally so that communities had a financial stake in the cost of sentencing.

Its report, Do Better Do Less, concludes that prisons have become "warehouses" where people with mental health problems and those with drug and alcohol addictions are "dumped".

The authors said criminals should be given community punishments instead of short prison terms. But it failed to say how many offenders should be in prison at any one time. Prison numbers have reached nearly 84,000, double what they were in 1992, despite an overall decline in crime.

Penal policy and the criminal justice system were responsible for driving up the numbers, said the commissioners.

"The intense and punitive political activity has had an effect of encouraging a more fearful and insecure population," the report said. Government policies had "raised unrealistic expectations" of what prisons could do for society, creating a "crisis in penal excess".

Ms Booth, the commission president, said: "This final report should be a road-map for long-term and fundamental reform. The commission proposes that justice is more local. Crucially, more widespread use of effective community sentences would both allow us to reduce the use of prison and allow for re-investment of resources into local communities to cut offending."

The commission chairman, Professor David Wilson, said England and Wales punished criminals "harshly and excessively". Ministers were guilty of passing legislation that increased prison terms while disregarding the consequences for the prison population.

"The result is a crisis of overcrowding which threatens to bring the penal system to its knees," he said.

A Ministry of Justice spokesman said prison would remain a "central part" of government policy: "While we disagree with some of the commission's findings, we do agree that, for those who have committed less serious offences, community punishments are highly effective, with a lower re-offending rate than short custodial sentences.

"But prison... plays a critical role in punishing and reforming and is the right place for the most serious, violent and persistent offenders. By describing prisons as 'vast warehouses' the report both distorts reality and overlooks the superb work of prison officers and other staff who work so hard to protect the public and help offenders."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Bliar
[info]hanibalecter wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 07:33 am (UTC)
The wife is getting the message that the man she married might be good at sex but like most predators is prone to lies and deceit in order to get his way.
Presumably the purpose of this policy like scores of others was an attempt to gain some good headlines.
Of course...
[info]tallise wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 08:31 am (UTC)
"Prison numbers have reached nearly 84,000, double what they were in 1992, despite an overall decline in crime."
... it could be argued that crime is lower because the criminals are behind bars. Michael Howard would certainly take this line.
Re: Of course...
[info]berewic wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 11:20 pm (UTC)
Reported crime is down. Or should I say "recorded" crime is down. Not quite the same thing as a reduction in crime.
Many have come to know reporting crime is a waste of time and a phone call, as the police rarely respond and half the time don't even record it to come within government targets.
My neighbour had his window broken by the same vandal for two years within hours of repairing the damage from the previous attack. Each time I witnessed this, I contacted the police only to be told it was a low priority and they would respond any time within the next four hours. After two years they finally responded.

As for prison reform. Sentences should have a nought added to the figure and prisoners should be put to work building paving slabs and any other mass produced product regularly payed for by the tax payer. To tackle drug addiction, visits should be behind closed screens to stop visitors passing illicit substances. Prisons today have more entertainment and less discipline than a 60's holiday camp. Colour televisions in every cell and access to Playstation games. It's hardly surprising prison populations are so high.
That's what happens when you let the Daily Mail set policy
[info]lexyboy wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 10:16 am (UTC)
need I say more?
to Lexyboy
[info]trojan_horace wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 11:30 am (UTC)
No you needn't... succinctly summarized.
also to lexyboy
[info]viljam wrote:
Friday, 3 July 2009 at 03:25 pm (UTC)
home secretaries from Blunkett to Smith have played and brayed to the tabloids;especially Smith herself a tabloid object. See how tough we are! Applause! So under her and Reid's watch we get such appalling injustices as indefinite sentences, unthinkable even in Blair's role model, the US. There are some with these senttences who are probably innocent. More so than Ms Smith.
Who wants to be a millionaire
[info]gaolhouse wrote:
Saturday, 4 July 2009 at 10:12 pm (UTC)
I wonder how much Blair(Booth) has cost us at her extortionate hourly QC rate?

Money grabbing scum, the both of them.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date