UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Union anger at threat of public sector pay freeze

Chancellor suggests state employees will not be immune to pain of the recession

By Andy McSmith

Public sector employees have been warned that the cold blast of recession is going to hit their pay packets, because it would be unfair on the rest of the population if they were sheltered from its effects.

So far, the recession has brought heavy job losses in the private sector, which will continue to get worse, despite signs that the recession may be coming to an end. Even when the economy picks up, the Government will have to grapple with huge debts accumulated since last year.

This week, Gordon Brown will urge the leaders of the world's largest economies when they meet for the G8 summit at L'Aquila, in Italy, not to let up on their efforts to stimulate the global economy just because there are early signs that it is picking up. The Chancellor, Alistair Darling, dropped a hint that the next public sector pay round, which will be decided over the next few weeks, is not going to be generous.

"It has got to be fair to people who work for the public sector just as we have to be fair to the private sector," he told Sky News yesterday.

His remarks did nothing to cheer union leaders, who were already furious about a suggestion from the chief executive of the Audit Commission, Steve Bundred, that there should be no pay increases for public employees.

Writing in yesterday's Observer, Mr Bundred argued: "At a time when inflation is likely to be between 2 per cent and 3 per cent, a pain-free way of cutting public spending would be to freeze public sector pay, or at least impose severe pay restraint."

The suggestion that low-paid public employees should take what amounts to a pay cut was roundly condemned by Dave Prentis, general secretary of the main public sector union, Unison. "Freezing public sector pay during a recession is not the way to steer people through it," he said. "The recession was caused by bankers and speculators and the lack of regulation.

"Low-paid public sector workers, who will be helping communities through the recession, shouldn't be expected to pay. At the same time, City bonuses are making a come-back with figures that most workers can't dream of earning in a lifetime. That is wrong. Let's have some fairness."

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokesman, agreed that there would have to be "severe restraint", but that an "absolute across-the-board freeze" would not make much sense. He suggested that restraint should begin with the scrapping of bonuses for highly paid public employees.

"It's absolutely ridiculous that people at the top end of the Civil Service, in the current public finance environment, two-thirds of them are being paid bonuses over and above their salaries," he told Sky News.

His remarks followed claims in The Sunday Times that the deputy director general of the BBC, Mark Byford, has accumulated a pension pot of almost £8m, giving him an income for life of at least £229,500 a year. Alan Yentob, the BBC's creative director, would get an income of £216,667 from his £6.3m pot. The BBC said the figures were "wrong and wildly exaggerated".

The scale of the problems was underlined yesterday by the former prime minister, Sir John Major, who said that even if the richest were paying 50 per cent tax, the basic rate of income tax went up 5p, and VAT went up to 20 per cent, it still would not be enough to sort out the Government's finances.

Pension pots: Bonanza at the BBC

£216,667 pa: Alan Yentob, 62

Creative director of the BBC. He joined as a trainee in 1968. Has held his present job since June 2004.

£229,500 pa; Mark Byford, 51

deputy director general of the BBC. He joined in 1979, aged 20, as a "temporary holiday relief assistant".

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]cm999 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 07:08 am (UTC)
Why should the public sector suffer? In case the government hadnt noticed the recession is caused by the private sector so surely this is the sector to suffer. If reports in this paper are true and banks are putting aside billions to pay bonuses for causing a recession, then propped up by the government, then why should public sector suffer?
Roll on the strikes.
[info]proximaking wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 07:29 am (UTC)
In case cm999 hadn't noticed the public sector produces not one penny for services and neither does anyone working in it. I haven't had a rise in well over a year now and several of my colleagues working in the same industry have had a 10% cut in February followed by a 5% cut last month. That's the private sector for you and it is a matter of like it or lump it. I have friends who work in the public sector as nurses, teachers, social work department etc and to say the control of funds is lax would be a massive understatement. One of them can even phone in and see when they are able to take another sick day within the rules and someone in HR will tell them. Can you imagine that happening in the private sector? Salaries and pensions in the non-earning public sector are far above that for the same job levels elsewhere, most of our useless police officers for example are paid double what they could get in a private security firm that actually works. I spotted a miracle in Dundee the other week, a 4ft 6inch policewoman walking alone on the beat, now it has come to a pretty rum doo when THAT is seen as a miracle because police officers used to go out in the big bad world alone but for a whistle and a truncheon. It just shows how bad it has become when what was the norm for service has become a miracle. The same day in Aberdeen I saw a council guy blowing dust from the pavements onto the road, ...... dust! Sorry cm999 but if you think the public really need those sorts of services you must be off your trolley. I use street lights and I need someone to take rubbish away at my house once a month and that is it and both of those could be done far cheaper and more efficiently by private contractors, ..... roll on the strikes and see who cares, it won't be me.
Re: Roll on the strikes.
[info]cm999 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:25 am (UTC)
I think you will find that it is the private sector that takes your rubbish away! It was called compulsary compentative tender and then best value. This probably accounts for why its so expensive and inefficient. Having worked in both sectors of the economy it amazes me how inefficient the private sector is.

:Look at the recent examples, cds of data lost in transit by the private courier. The numerous govt IT projects that go wrong, all staffed and contracted out to the private sector who then mess them up.
Wait for the wailing
[info]disorganised1 wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 07:35 am (UTC)
this will doubtless trigger the cries from the public sector about how they are underpaid so earn their right to their protected pension. Well once upon a time.....

I work alongside ex-public sector workers and see directly how their salary compares to mine. My deputy is on a higher basic than me - he gets more holiday than me - his redundancy terms are vastly superior to mine, he still has a final salary pension, and should he get a grade rise then he gets a guaranteed 7% pay rise as part of his terms.

As regards the banking sector, well this government has made its stance quite clear - workers can go to the wall - Rover, Peugeot, Woolworths, dockyards, but bankers must be protected at all costs.
[info]dnmurphy wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 11:10 am (UTC)
What the scummy union rep ignores of course is that hundreds of thousands of non public sector workers are being made redundant and having pay cuts, and thousands losing thier homes, but of cousre the scummy union rep only compares his workers with bank bosses. if the rest of us have to suffer (and many in the private sector losing their jobs get paid worse than public sector workers ) then the public sector workers should also have to take some pain. they lead privileged lazy lives anyway, time for a shakeup.
Poor little public sector workers....NOT
[info]s6blr wrote:
Monday, 6 July 2009 at 10:24 pm (UTC)
Welcome to the party public sector workers just like all of us in the private sector. Given we pay your salary you should be subject to the same fears of job losses, pay freezes, worry over making ends meet, and paying your obligations just like the rest of us. We're sick and tired of you getting a 3-5% pay rise, in many cases over the rate of inflation, just because you will go all strike over leaves on track, etc. You need to get a grip on reality and understand that underperformers don't get automatic raises, when the company is in the doldrums you are lucky to have your job. Its time you shut up and take it like an adult -- you've got a job so relish the fact that you do when so many others are out of work. We as taxpayers don't like your continued threats, boycotts, and strikes and demand you take stock and grow up!

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date