Watchdog warns over secret hearings
Wednesday 31 October 2012
Government plans to extend the use of secret hearings in courts are not compatible with the Human Rights Act, the equalities watchdog has said.
Plans to extend the use of secret evidence “are a departure from this country's traditions of open justice and fairness”, the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) said.
But the Cabinet Office said courts have found “time and again that closed material proceedings can be fair and can bring justice to an area of the law where currently there's none”.
The EHRC's verdict comes after the body examined the widely criticised Justice and Security Bill under its statutory duty to monitor and advise on proposed changes of law to ensure they meet human rights standards.
John Wadham, the watchdog's general counsel, said the process to extend so-called closed material procedures was “incompatible with the Human Rights Act”.
“The Government's proposals to extend the use of secret hearings to civil cases are a departure from this country's traditions of open justice and fairness,” he said.
“The process is incompatible with the Human Rights Act and the principle of a common law right to a fair trial and there is no real evidence to show how the proposals would improve the justice system.”
Under the Bill, judges will be able to listen to more civil cases in secret without claimants being able to hear the evidence against them.
A Cabinet Office spokeswoman said: “Courts have found time and again that closed material proceedings can be fair and can bring justice to an area of the law where currently there's none.
”It means courts will be able to hear cases - and see all of the evidence - regardless of how much information relating to national security is involved.“
There was an explicit statement in the Bill that it must be read in parallel with Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Cabinet Office added.
The EHRC's verdict also relies on legal advice which says the most senior judges in the land made a mistake in their most recent judgment on the procedures, it said.
But special advocates, the lawyers who would be involved in the cases covered by the proposals, have said key safeguards were missing and the plans would create a statutory straitjacket for judges.
Human rights group Amnesty also said it showed the Government wanted a ”secret justice system straight from the pages of a Kafka novel“.
But the Bill's proponents claim it is needed so the Government can contest civil claims in the courts.
The Government has said it is wasting millions of pounds of taxpayers' money on settling claims, some of which may have no merit, because it is unable to contest them as the evidence it would wish to produce is so secret that it cannot be revealed in an open court.
It comes after 16 terrorism suspects, including former Guantanamo Bay detainee Binyam Mohamed, received a multimillion-pound payout last November after they claimed they were mistreated by US and British security and intelligence officials.
- 1 Emma Watson on Jennifer Lawrence naked photo leak: 'Even worse than seeing women's privacy violated is reading the comments'
- 2 Saudis risk new Muslim division with proposal to move Mohamed’s tomb
- 3 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
- 4 Cee Lo Green: It is only rape if the victim is conscious
- 5 Nigerian witch-finder Helen Ukpabio threatens legal action against human rights organisations
Emma Watson on Jennifer Lawrence naked photo leak: 'Even worse than seeing women's privacy violated is reading the comments'
Victoria Justice on naked photo leak: 'Let me nip this in the bud right now – pun intended'
Ariana Grande nude photos leak: Pictures are completely fake, say representatives
Saudis risk new Muslim division with proposal to move Mohamed’s tomb
Kate Upton nude photos leak: Model's spokespeople 'looking into' authenticity of indecent images
Rotherham child sex abuse scandal: Labour Home Office to be probed over what Tony Blair's government knew - and when
What do immigrants really think of Britain? Polish immigrant's Reddit post goes viral
Ashya King: Parents of five-year-old boy refused permission to visit him in hospital and denied bail at Spanish court
With Douglas Carswell joining Ukip, my party has taken another giant step forward
When elitism grips the top of British society to this extent, there is only one answer: abolish private schools
Ashya King: 'Cruel NHS has not given us the treatment we need', says father of five-year-old with brain tumour who fled to Spain
£55000 - £65000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A Global Financial Service Organi...
£60000 - £70000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A prestigious leading professiona...
£40000 - £50000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A Global Financial Service Organi...
£50000 - £70000 per annum: Harrington Starr: One of the global leaders in prov...