UK

Rain (AM and PM) 3° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Westminster Abbey to get its crowning glory, at last

£10m corona will realise Wren's vision

By Arifa Akbar, Arts Correspondent

Sir Christopher Wren designed a tower for Westminster Abbey topped with a 12-sided spire. Now the abbey's dean has invited the public to comment on proposals to build a corona on the 1,000-year-old church

PA

Sir Christopher Wren designed a tower for Westminster Abbey topped with a 12-sided spire. Now the abbey's dean has invited the public to comment on proposals to build a corona on the 1,000-year-old church

Ever since Benedictine monks first made their home at Westminster AD 960, Britain's most famous abbey has been an architectural playground.

Monarchs and architects, including Sir Christopher Wren, Nicholas Hawksmoor and Sir George Gilbert Scott, have commissioned and built towers, turrets and chapels in a variety of styles.

More than a 1,000 years on, the Abbey authorities are to launch a public consultation on plans to change the the building once again – with the addition of a 21st century "corona", or crown, to sit on top of the roof at an estimated cost of £10m.

Wren and Hawksmoor are among those who have argued that the building needed a corona (featured atop some cathedrals) to mark its significance on the London skyline. Both sketched designs for this feature, which were later discarded.

Now the Dean of Westminister, the Very Reverend Dr John Hall, has resurrected the idea. The Queen has been briefed on the plan and if the concept proves popular, the Abbey will hold an architectural competition, and invite the Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA) to oversee entries.

It is hoped the work will be ready in time to mark the 60th anniversary of the Queen's Coronation at the Abbey in 2013 with the large crown a symbol of the royal milestone.

The Abbey was founded after King Edgar granted the Benedictine monks permission to stay there. A stone Abbey was built around 1045 by King Edward the Confessor as part of his palace there and it was consecrated in 1065. It was rebuilt after 1245 by Henry III, who had selected the site for his burial. Since the coronations in 1066 of King Harold and William the Conqueror, all English and British monarchs (except Edward V and Edward VIII, who did not have coronations) have been crowned in the Abbey. Seventeen monarchs lie buried there.

Wren, who worked for the Abbey, made a wooden model of a smaller tower bearing a 12-sided spire on top, constructed as a corona, but the idea was rejected because it would have been too heavy for the pillars below to support.

Hawksmoor, who designed the top sections of the Abbey's two west towers in 1745, and Scott, who remodelled the north side, also had plans for the roof that never came to fruition. Scott similarly submitted plans for a corona in the 19th century.

Rev Hall said the mix of architectural styles was part of the Abbey's appeal. Just as Wren's Gothic west towers had not been in keeping with the Romanesque architecture of the rest of the Abbey, the design of the corona could be "21st century" although it would have to be in keeping with the rest of its surroundings too.

"It is an odd accident of history that, where so many great churches have a magnificent tower or spire or dome, the Abbey remains unfinished over the site of every coronation since that of William the Conqueror on Christmas Day 1066. Now is the time to consider afresh what should be built there.

"The idea, in broad terms, for a corona, is to imagine a lifting of the eye. It could be made of wood, lead, stained glass with a cross the top, something which says this is where coronations have happened," he said. "It needs to be 21st century but also in keeping with the surrounding."

Rev Hall cited the crown on St Giles' Cathedral in Edinburgh as a fine example of a corona, but said there was no specific design in mind yet for the Abbey's crown.

An exhibition setting out the Abbey's development plans and inviting public comment launches today. The Abbey also plans to open its upper gallery, known as the Triforium, to the public for the first time to house an exhibition which will show its historic treasures and artefacts.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]rozr wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:16 am (UTC)
This sounds a jolly idea - until you hear what it's going to cost, added to which we can all suspect it will in the event cost a lot more.

How can the Church justify spending on this level during a world-wide credit crunch. This money would be better spent by using just a tiny amont for soem kind of decoration if people really want it and send the rest to deserving charities. I thought the Church was about helping and saving people and this is a time in the world's hisstory when a lot of people are starving and dying of dreadful illnesses and need help. I can't see a fancy thingy on top of Westminster Abbey in prosperous (even now) London will help any of those desperate people.

I agree that sounds a bit harsh on the corona-lovers so why can't they do it cheaper - although admittedly the anticipated cost is little different to the average annual income with bonuses etc of a banker. Perhaps we might ask a banker to pay for the corona - it seems like any senior banker, let's say the new boss of RBS, could easily afford the total bill. That would be a better use for the banker's monstrous salary than squandering it on himself or hiding it in a bank account, and allow the Church to use its money for charity.

It should be remembered that in the past the super-rich mostly had obligations as well - to care for their minionos, to go to war for the king at their own expense, to loan money to the king, etc. Nowadays it seems bankers and other greedy types who can get it just rake in the money and wallow in it. This is one of the reasons people so resent the super rich who seem able to grab the money "from us" and not give it back in any way at all that we can see.
Repulsive
[info]tominlondon wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 10:22 am (UTC)
Westminster Abbey is the least spiritual place on God's earth. First of all you have to pay to get in, and you have to get past heavy-looking, unpleasant, potentially violent "minders".

Once inside, you are bombarded with nationalistic, warmongering monarchist messages, all wrapped up in a religious container.

Somewhere under all that is a venerable piece of French architecture (the gothic bits) further added to by Hawksmoor and others. It's all a bit of a mess, so why not add another bit on top? All part of the spectacle. God Rave the Queen. Oops, typo.
10M
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 01:09 am (UTC)
Haven't we got more pressing needs to reduce expenditure at present than embarking on trivial vanity projects?
The right kind of expenditure
[info]robert_hardy wrote:
Monday, 13 July 2009 at 12:26 pm (UTC)
If the money spent employs largely British craftspeople and designers, paying British taxes, then the money just goes around we are all better off for the spending of it. I absolutely agree about Westminster Abbey though - awful place but it keeps the tourists happy.

Most popular

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date