UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 13° London Hi 14°C / Lo 8°C

Yours for £1,000: a Caribbean cruise, or a return ticket to the Kyle of Lochalsh

For the first time, a UK rail fare breaks the four-figure barrier

By Michael Savage, Transport Correspondent

Eilean Donan Castle in Dornie, Kyle of Lochalsh

ALAMY

Eilean Donan Castle in Dornie, Kyle of Lochalsh

It is a sinking feeling familiar to thousands of rail passengers. Packed and ready to travel, their optimistic expectations of a trip on Britain's railways can be swiftly quashed by the eye-wateringly high fare prices demanded at the ticket office.

Anyone who has grudgingly forked out more than they would have liked for their trip might count themselves lucky following the revelation that, for the first time, unfortunate travellers on one route will be forced to stump up more than £1,000 for their ticket.

Passengers wishing temporarily to swap the party culture of Newquay, Cornwall, for the more serene pace of life enjoyed in the sleepy coastal village of the Kyle of Lochalsh, in the Scottish Highlands, will have to pay £1,002 for the privilege after the latest round of fare hikes. Enquiries carried out by The Independent found that a passenger could opt for a one-week luxury cruise in the Caribbean instead, together with flights to and from Puerto Rico, and still come home with £50 change.

Any travellers wanting a return "walk on" ticket in a first-class carriage for the 20hr 30min trip would be charged the record-breaking figure, which was discovered as part of a survey carried out by Barry Doe, a public transport consultant. He found that passengers would not even enjoy the luxury of a first-class cabin for two sections of the trip (the journey involves changing three times) and anyone wanting to get any sleep would have to fork out an extra £43 for a sleeper.

Tickets for the 1,700-mile return journey are available through the CrossCountry train firm. A spokesman for the company said: "No one has actually bought this £1,000 fare but it does exist. Someone wanting a first-class return would be likely to book a saver return in advance and pay £561."

Mr Doe's survey also revealed that some standard "walk on" return fares had doubled in price since the mid-1990s. Other trips seeing a major rise included the London-to-Manchester route, increasing from £33 in 1995 to £66.10, and a London-to-Newcastle return ticket, which had seen an 84 per cent price rise over the same period to £105.

Prices shot up again at the start of this year, despite the onset of the recession. Passenger groups were furious after fares on some routes rose by more than 10 per cent. Regulated fares, such as season tickets and off-peak tickets, increased by an average of 6 per cent, with the cost of an advance fare rising by an average of 7 per cent across Britain.

Although the ticketing system for trains has been simplified, many passengers still complain that "walk-on" fares are still far too high, while confusion often reigns over which trains can be caught using an advance-purchase tickets. Cat Hobbs, from the Campaign for Better Transport, said the £1,000 fare showed that huge problems remained with the rail network's pricing system. "Fares in this country are far too expensive," she said. "They are the most expensive in Europe. We think the Government should step in and review how they regulate fares."

Norman Baker, the Liberal Democrat transport spokesman, said that the first £1,000 ticket was an "unwelcome landmark" that would do nothing to convince more people to travel by rail. "When you can fly half way across Europe for £30, the idea that you can end up paying £1,000 for a train journey in Britain is absolutely scandalous," he said. "Not only are passengers being encouraged off the trains and into their cars, but some considering this journey may decide they'd rather fly to Australia and back for half the price."

The shadow Transport minister, Stephen Hammond, said: "Fare payers have become all too used to appalling value for money. Today's revelation of a £1,000 fare really takes the biscuit."

Off the rails: Other ways could you spend the train fare

* Thirty-one flights from London to Edinburgh: £991.65. Flights from London Stansted: £31.99 each, including taxes.

* One-week Caribbean cruise, plus flights to San Juan, Puerto Rico: £945. Flights from London: £539. Cruise: Adventure of the Seas, £406, visiting Bridgetown, Barbados; Castries, St Lucia; St John's, Antigua; Philipsburg, St Maarten; St Croix, US Virgin Islands.

* Second-hand Ford Escort, bought in Newquay, with enough petrol for the 1,700-mile round trip: £877.20. Cost of car: red Ford Escort 1.6 SI, bought from Newquay's Newmans Automotive: £599. Petrol costs: £278.20; around 57 gallons needed, using fuel at 30 miles to the gallon.

* Taxi fare from Newquay to Kyle of Lochalsh and back again: £800. Two people sharing a minibus run by Don's Cabs, Newquay, would have to shell out £800 each for the return journey, but would have enough space to stretch out for a kip.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Insane
[info]explodingbadger wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 03:05 am (UTC)
Something is seriously wrong with our rail service.
This is insane.
[info]sunday1morning wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 04:41 am (UTC)
I have just returned from Rome, which, as a plane-phobic person, I travelled to by train across Europe. Cost? £160 return, including the Eurostar to Paris. (Eurostar to Paris £59 return, Paris to Rome on the overnight sleeper £101 return).

I hope the Lisbon treaty manages to infect our railway system with whatever it is the European ones have, that manages to make them run on time, and cheap.
Thatcher style privatisation is great isn't it?
[info]steve_wilds wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 08:16 am (UTC)
£561 for a "Saver" Return!

You can travel by train from Leeds to the south of France for less than half of that.

What a ridiculous country we live in.

Quit complaining!!
[info]morgan_stephen1 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 08:43 am (UTC)
I'm sorry but if the British people have voted in the Ultra-Capitalist/Privatisation Labourconservative party at every election since Queen Margaret of Thatcher ruled, they can hardly expect such a regime to provide them with proper transportation. I am currently in Spain where my 42 mile round-trip fare to work costs me £2.80! This is less than my previous Putney to Liverpool Street trip. I rejoice each time I take it, imagining how much I would have had to pay for a similar jouney in the UK. I recently read that when last nationalised, the train system was subsidised to the tune of £2 billion a year and now it is 'privatised', the subsidy is £4 billion! Go New Labour! We pay the owners of private train companies £4,000,000,000 a year to flog us this disgraceful service.
Only when the suppine and unquestioning British populace wakes up to what they have been voting for all these years and decides to elect a government devoted to providing them with proper services instead of lining the pockets of private industry will anything improve. Therefore they should vote for the . . .uh, ... oh, there are no parties devoted to anysuch thing. Oh well. That's 'democracy'!
But Britain is not completely hopeless at the travel business; it does have something that the continent largely lacks - cheap airlines. I once searched for the cheapest fare from Barcelona to Bilbao - the search returned BCN to Bristol, Bristol to Bilbao! Bring on Easytrain and Ryanfare!
Taxi
[info]snowdonwatcher wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 10:15 am (UTC)
That's great that you have researched the taxi fare & found that cheaper too.

But then I suspect that is what might happen to you anyway. My son had to go to Inverness a while ago & the train company took him as far as Dundee & then put the passengers into 2 taxis for the rest of their journey.

Well even the train company realise that for more than 1 person travelling it is cheaper by car!

By the way, Newquay to Glasgow is less than £200 return flying, & that would be a better option than going from Stanstead for our mythical passenger!
Air Asia
[info]timspooner wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 02:15 pm (UTC)
Flights between countries all around Asia for the price of a pint of beer. Just look at the website. Great service too.
cheer up
[info]geo32 wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 06:37 pm (UTC)
There is one consolation and that it is now free to drive over the "Bridge of Skye"!!

The money paid by government to the rail companies should ensure free travel by train

What a bunch of mugs we are in this country fleeced by banks, fleeced by rail companies, fleeced by bus operators, fleeced by petrol suppliers,fleeced by the government, fleeced by football grounds it never ends

All I can say is BAAAAAAAA BAAAAAAAA
What the hell is the point?
[info]ouldbob wrote:
Wednesday, 4 November 2009 at 07:33 pm (UTC)
We are going to have a 250 mph rail service to Scotland some time soon. What the hell for? I'll fly, thank you. I don't mind having to check in three weeks before my flight and live on coffee coloured liquid from cardboard cartons if it saves me £700. I can get a flight to Oz fro less than the train to Scotland.
Yours for £1,000: a Caribbean cruise, or a return ticket to the Kyle of Lochalsh
[info]lukeneave wrote:
Thursday, 5 November 2009 at 05:28 pm (UTC)
They are clearly exploting a monopoly position. A return trip Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington is £59 and that's travelling off peak, otherwise it is £159. Who can afford these fares. The rail companies should have to prove they are running to capacity or reduce their fares.

Most popular


Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date