Inflation rate higher for rich, study finds
Friday 23 September 1994
The study, from the Institute of Fiscal Studies and the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, says inflation in the 'real economy' can vary by as much as 3 percentage points, depending on the income of the consumer.
In spite of fears expressed by poverty pressure groups, the move from direct to indirect taxes since 1979 has had a greater impact on the rich, it suggests. The main reason is that the poor spend more of their income on necessities such as food, fuel and clothing, the relative price of which fell during the 1980s.
'Luxuries' such as eating out and entertainment have grown relatively more expensive. Better-off households have been spending much more in these areas, particularly on entertainment.
The report says VAT zero- rating of items such as food, fuel, public transport and children's clothing, which are important items of spending for poorer households, means that the burden of the tax has fallen most heavily on the better-off. However, the cost-of- living of rich and poor has varied since 1979. During the early 1980s, for example, the poorest 10 per cent faced a real inflation higher than the retail price index (RPI).
By 1992, the picture had changed: the richest 10 per cent faced inflation 2.46 per cent higher than average; for the poorest 10 per cent, the figure was 0.32 per cent lower.
The author, Ian Crawford, says that linking social security benefits to the RPI may leave poor households short of cash for periods of one or two years: benefits should be more closely tailored to the recipient's cost of living.
Although the study indicates that the increase in real income inequality is less than statistics have suggested,'this does not imply that it is good to be poor. The differences are small and the welfare effects of low income massively outweigh the effects of a slightly lower-than-average cost of living.'
When capital gains and losses on housing are taken into account, poorer households appear to have done worse, because many elderly poor people own their homes and have felt the full effect of falling house prices.
Diving in at the deep end is no excuse for shirking the style stakes
- 1 World Cup 2014: 20 things we learned in Brazil
- 2 Why I'm on the brink of burning my Israeli passport
- 3 War is war: Why I stand with Israel
- 4 L'Oreal cuts ties with Belgium supporter Axelle Despiegelaere after hunting trip photographs
- 5 World Cup 2014: Robin van Persie gives his bronze medal to eccentric Netherlands fan moments after being handed it by Sepp Blatter
Game of Thrones author George RR Martin says 'f*** you' to fans who fear he will die before finishing Westeros saga
Ian Thorpe gay: Olympic swimmer comes out in Parkinson interview
Pamplona bull run: Man who contributed to a survival guide for the festival falls foul of the raging beasts
Israel-Gaza conflict: William Hague calls for ceasefire but says Israel 'has the right to defend itself'
Supermoon 2014: When and why will the moon look bigger and brighter this summer?
Sustained immigration has not harmed Britons' employment, say government advisers
War is war: Why I stand with Israel
7/7 memorial defaced on anniversary of 2005 attacks with ‘Blair lied thousands died’ graffiti
Australia facing international condemnation after turning around Sri Lankans at sea
Even when it brutalises one of its own teenage citizens, America is helpless against Israel
Socialist Worker called to apologise over ‘vile’ article saying Eton schoolboy Horatio Chapple's death is ‘reason to save the polar bears’
£70000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Information Security Manager (ISO 27001, A...
£30000 - £45000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C# Developer (...
£60000 - £80000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: C# Integration...
£75000 - £85000 per annum + ex bens: Deerfoot IT Resources Limited: Biztalk Te...