Pilots press for aircraft safety systems: The authorities are dragging their heels over installing equipment that helped avert two recent collisions. Christian Wolmar reports
Friday 22 October 1993
Two British jets, from Monarch and Ambassador, came within 300ft of each other near Malaga on 3 September and last Monday two aircraft, from Britannia and Air 2000, were reported to be only 400ft apart near Palma, Majorca.
In both cases, one aircraft had been cleared by air traffic control to pass through the other's flight level and after warnings from the equipment, pilots took evasive action.
The traffic collision avoidance system (TCAS) was only in use by chance because the jets concerned are used on transatlantic routes and the equipment is being made mandatory at the end of the year in the United States. The US Federal Aviation Authority made the move after a series of mid-air collisions, and US pilots have welcomed the measure. In Britain there is substantial support from the industry for the TCAS to be mandatory but in both countries air traffic controllers have opposed its introduction.
Here, the Civil Aviation Authority has refused to make British aircraft install the equipment. It has commissioned a survey into its use and Eurocontrol, which links European air traffic controllers, is also preparing a report, but this is not due until March 1995.
The CAA does not want to be rushed into using American technology, which is all that is available, it does not want to impose the cost on British airlines - estimated at pounds 150,000 per aircraft - and its researchers are not convinced that the TCAS is sufficiently developed.
David Harrison, the CAA's head of collision avoidance, said: 'There have been several versions of TCAS already and the software is being changed all the time. The early versions gave a lot of unnecessary warnings.' He said false warnings could lead aircraft into potentially dangerous situations.
The system works by creating a radar bubble around the aircraft and when an intruder enters it, a warning is sounded. It tells the pilot to descend or climb to avoid a collision but issues no instructions on the heading of the aircraft. Nuisance warnings, where there is no risk of collision but the computer thinks there is, are recognised even by the manufacturers as a problem.
British Airways, which has a third of its fleet fitted with the TCAS - those aircraft which fly to the US - said: 'This is one of the biggest contributors to air safety since radar. We are convinced its use is ultimately inevitable.' However, the airline is refusing to install the equipment in the rest of its fleet until the CAA acts because 'we don't feel that European air traffic control systems can cope with it'. Air traffic controllers are generally against its introduction, fearing it will take their control of the airspace away.
- 1 Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Pro-Russian rebel 'admits to shooting down plane'
- 3 Israel-Gaza conflict: The myth of Hamas’s human shields
- 5 Dutch paedophile club to fight their ban at the European Court of Human Rights
Lana Del Rey: 'I have slept with a lot of guys in the industry'
Peaches Geldof cause of death: 'Heroin addict' socialite had taken fatal dose of drug, inquest concludes
Peaches Geldof inquest: Tragic final moments of socialite's life reveal she lied to husband about failed heroin tests
Israel-Gaza conflict: The myth of Hamas’s human shields
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Was a Russian-made missile really parked in this quiet square?
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Vladimir Putin is given 'one last chance' to end hostilities in Ukraine
The 'scroungers’ fight back: The welfare claimants battling to alter stereotypes
The truth about conspiracy theories is that some require considering
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Ukrainian military jet was flying close to passenger plane before it was shot down, says Russian officer
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: victims’ bodies bundled in black bags and loaded onto trains
£49000 - £55000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: My client is...
£48000 - £54000 per annum + Benefits package: Progressive Recruitment: My clie...
£35000 - £45000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: If you're pa...
£45000 - £55000 per annum + competitive: Progressive Recruitment: SAP Business...