Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Anschutz apologises for saying faith group backed bid for 'super-casino'

Ben Russell
Wednesday 30 August 2006 00:00 BST
Comments

The firm bidding to open Britain's first "super-casino" on the site of the Millennium Dome has apologised after producing a document suggesting that local religious leaders were supportive of the development.

Anschutz Entertainment Group acted after members of the Greenwich Peninsula Chaplaincy complained that the firm had sent a summary of their views to the independent Casino Advisory Panel without clearing it with church leaders beforehand.

The document's "positive" tone sparked anger because members of the multi-faith group had already issued a document critical of the casino plan, ranked the front-runner by the Casino Advisory Panel, which will recommend which proposal for a regional "super-casino" be given the go-ahead later this year.

The document, written by the former Greenwich Council official Rosa D'Alessandro, said that "whilst some of their constituent faiths consider gambling to be incompatible with their faith, they recognise the right to gamble in a free country".

However, a paper written by the chaplaincy insisted that faiths "recognise that gambling can prevent human flourishing and should be avoided".

The Rev Malcolm Torry, co-ordinator of the chaplaincy set up to cater for building workers and future residents on the east London site said that the group included faiths opposed to gambling.

He said: "Muslims are fundamentally opposed to gambling, and the sacred texts of Sikhs, Hindus and Baha'is are similarly negative. Christians and Jews have a variety of views on the issue - you find some Christians fundamentally opposed and others are not.

"We had written a paper last year to explain the view of the different faiths and it came out as pretty negative, of course because the majority of faiths are."

But David Campbell, chief executive of AEG Europe, blamed the dispute on an "oversight" but insisted the matter was closed.

The row is the latest controversy to hit the Anschutz casino bid, which was at the centre of a political storm last month after it emerged that the firm's owner, the American billionaire Philip Anschutz had entertained John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, at his Colorado ranch last year and presented him with a cowboy outfit.

Mr Campbell said: "A summary of what was believed to be the situation was submitted to the CAP. We have apologised to the Chaplaincy that this did not reflect all of their views and was not cleared by their trustees. They understand the circumstances surrounding this oversight, have fully accepted the apology and believe the matter is now closed.

"We have asked that the CAP website is updated where necessary."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in