‘Bedroom tax’ wrongly levied on thousands of homes
Labour FOI request suggests as many as 50,000 households have been charged in error
Andrew Grice has been Political Editor of The Independent since 1998. He was previously Political Editor of The Sunday Times, where he worked for 10 years, and he has been a Westminster-based journalist since 1982. His column, Inside Politics, appears in The Independent each Saturday.
Tuesday 11 February 2014
More than 16,000 people have been unlawfully charged due to the Government’s controversial “bedroom tax,” it emerged on Tuesday night.
Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to 140 local authorities revealed that the number of people who have wrongly had their housing benefit cut is more than three times as many as ministers predicted. Labour claimed the “spare room subsidy” cut was in chaos.
A loophole in the law means that thousands of people in social housing who have lived in the same property since 1996 should not have been asked to pay the “bedroom tax.” But they have seen their housing benefit reduced since the tax was brought in April last year.
Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, told MPs last month that between 3,000 and 5,000 residents would be affected by the error. But housing charities say the figure could be as high as 40,000.
The FOI requests, submitted by Labour, were sent to all 346 local authorities and 140 replied. The 16,460 people identified include 2,100 in Birmingham alone; 913 in Glasgow; 648 in the London borough of Lambeth and 452 in Warrington.
A Department of Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: "We expect very few people to be affected by this - around 5,000 - and are working with councils to ensure affected claimants are kept informed."
Chris Bryant, a Labour spokesman on work and pensions, said that it was now clear Mr Duncan Smith was “picking numbers out of thin air.” He said: "With just a third of councils so far responding to our Freedom of Information requests, we already know that over 16,000 people are affected. At this rate the total will be nearly 50,000 households, each of them overcharged by an average of £640. That’s £3,072,000 that will have to be repaid.”
Mr Bryant added: “The ‘bedroom tax’ has been a fiasco from start to finish and now the Government has been caught out trying to downplay how many people are exempted by it. This would be a farce if it weren’t for the upset this has caused many vulnerable families and the huge cost to taxpayers. We’ve always said the ‘bedroom tax’ is cruel and unfair. The Government should ditch it; if it doesn’t then Labour will.”
The tax affects 660,000 housing benefit claimants living in council or housing association properties, imposing an average penalty of between £14 and £22 a week on working-age tenants deemed to have more bedrooms than they need.
Government sources denied that the people affected by the loophole had been “wrongly charged.” They said the intention of the policy was that this group would be affected but the regulations had been wrongly drafted. Officials said the problem would be rectified from next month.
On Wednesday Labour will force a Commons vote on its proposal to repeal the “bedroom tax.” Ian Lavery, a Labour MP, will bring in a backbench Bill saying that no claimant should be “financially penalised” for the number of bedrooms in his or her home. But Conservative and Liberal Democrat MPs are expected to vote down the Bill.
Lord Freud, the Welfare Reform Minister, and Kris Hopkins, the Housing Minister, will be questioned about the Government’s housing benefit reforms by the Work and Pensions Select Committee on Wednesday.
- 1 'Nasa Confirms Six Days of Darkness in December': No, they don't - it's a hoax
- 2 Canadian actor punched in face after 'Islamophobia' experiment goes wrong in wake of Ottawa shooting
- 3 Woman blinded as a child can see again after hitting her head on a coffee table
- 4 Paul Hollywood: Police asked if I wanted them to arrest Mary Berry for vandalism after she 'defaced' my car
- 5 If you think Russell Brand’s new book is confused, you should read what his critics have to say about it
'Nasa Confirms Six Days of Darkness in December': No, they don't - it's a hoax
Tower of London poppies: Tens of thousands of people flock to see installation in its final days
Top Gear presenter Jeremy Clarkson criticised for beer tweet
Woman blinded as a child can see again after hitting her head on a coffee table
Bryan Adams' heartstopping images of wounded British soldiers to go on show at Somerset House
Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are real and God is not 'a magician with a magic wand'
Huge surge in Ukip support after EU funding row, according to new poll
Ukip ‘exploiting grooming scandal’ to secure party’s first police chief
Nigel Farage: 'There’s nothing wrong with white people blacking up'
Maureen Lipman says 'she can't vote Labour while Ed Miliband is leader'
Muslims, immigration and teenage pregnancy: British people are ignorant about almost everything
£40000 - £65000 per annum + bonus + benefits + OT: Ampersand Consulting LLP: M...
£22800 - £33600 per annum: Randstad Education Manchester Secondary: The JobAt ...
£22800 - £33600 per annum: Randstad Education Manchester Secondary: Calling al...
£100 - £125 per day: Randstad Education Chelmsford: EYFS Teachers - East Essex...