Bercow: pay back your expenses now
Speaker says that he will not be a 'shop steward' for MPs
John Bercow, the Commons Speaker, has told MPs they must accept it is "payback time" on their expenses to restore public trust in Parliament and avoid allegations of a "Westminster whitewash".
In his first interview since becoming Speaker in June, Mr Bercow urged MPs to accept the verdict of Sir Thomas Legg, the former civil servant auditing their expenses who has demanded that they repay thousands of pounds in allowances. "Denial, delay or delusion is not an option," he said.
"Many MPs are upset but the public is extremely angry. We have to recognise and address that anger," he told Steve Richards, The Independent's chief political commentator, in an interview for tomorrow's Week in Westminster programme on BBC Radio 4.
The Speaker's tough message will disappoint MPs who hoped he would challenge Sir Thomas's decision to impose retrospective limits for cleaning and gardening costs. He declared that his role was not to be a "shop steward" for MPs but an "ambassador for Parliament".
Mr Bercow insisted the Legg inquiry was never intended to be a "receipt-authentication process" and was always going to review the wisdom of original payments. Although MPs could challenge its initial recommendations, he believed the vast majority would accept its final ruling in their case.
"In the end, we have to secure closure," he said. "There is no perfection in this process. There is a trade-off between 'within the rules' on the one hand and 'well beyond public expectations' on the other. If there is a choice of headlines between 'payback time' on the one hand and 'Westminster whitewash' on the other, I would much rather have the former than the latter.
"The public has to see and be satisfied that we have got the message, that there is public displeasure, that the process has to be changed, and that there must be consequences for past claims if they can be shown to be demonstrably wrong or extravagant."
Yesterday, the Speaker said he would repay an "accidental overclaim" of £978.51 after being asked by Sir Thomas to provide mortgage documentation relating to his second home. He said the discrepancy arose after he switched mortgage provider for a better deal.
In the BBC interview, Mr Bercow said he hoped Cabinet ministers who sit in the House of Lords, such as the Business Secretary, Peter Mandelson, and the Transport Secretary, Lord Adonis, could soon be answering questions in the Commons, and admitted there was currently a "democratic deficit". As an interim measure, they may be quizzed by MPs in the Westminster Hall mini-chamber rather than the Commons chamber.
Mr Bercow, who will be challenged in his Buckingham seat by the UK Independence Party's Nigel Farage at the general election, said he was happy to be judged on his track record, his commitment to the constituency and his determination to restore faith in Parliament.
The tensions caused by the Legg review surfaced yesterday, when the Commons Leader, Harriet Harman, said it would be "arbitrary" for Sir Thomas to apply different rules and standards than those which applied at the time MPs' expenses were claimed. Although Downing Street denied any split, her remarks to MPs appeared to differ from Gordon Brown's edict to Labour MPs to accept the payback demands.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
The initial response of so many MP's was deplorable, but it will be very interesting to see which of them is actually brave enough to challenge Legg.
The stamp duty, the mortgage payments, how much is actual interest, how much reducing the total amount of the loan, these and their other claims need greater scrutiny.
How much tax avoidance and how much tax evasion? This is not vindictive, merely seeing the law makers put to the same trials as any other person. Remember, these are the same law makers who have allowed anti-terror laws to be used by local council snoopers to search our bins and bug our phones for far less offenses.
How much of their claims were strictly necessary for parliamentary work, and how much was opportunistic upgrading of life style at tax payers expense?
As these claimants have been seen as a whole to be so untrustworthy, I suggest that their other expenses should be called into expense, every last penny.
How much of their communication allowance is legitimate parliamentary business, and how much blatant electioneering at taxpayers expense?
They should not be allowed to audit their own books now, or ever again in the future.
Gordon Kennedy
JustVoteThemOut.com
It is the very height of hypocrisy to push, coerce, bully and intimidate civil servants into widening the definition of 'reasonable' and then to claim in faux innocence that those very civil servants virtually encouraged them to claim to the limit and encouraged them to believe it was right.
This is self regulation at its worst. How could we have allowed these ghastly people to not only assume positions of power over us (and I mean all MPs), but to preach to us from supposed moral stature?
no-one and nothing can regulate it unless it chooses a regulator to do so; that is just how it is; morality-a subjective phenomenon just does not come into it.our constitution contains no "shoulds"- norms; save that everyone should obey the law as set down by the Queen in Parliament
no Parliament can bind itself that is established in common law
Regardless of the fact they have "gone by the rules" ( Self made) in claiming for everything from porn videos to fiddling mortgages they cannot see the harm they are doing the so called "integrity of the British Government"
It is time they came down from their ivory towers, cloud cuckoo land, na na land call it what you may to the planet of earth
My advice is Pay Up. Shut Up. Resign. Never apply again for any future govement office as you are now classified as liars and cheats.
I propose they go on a register similar to that of paedofiles as they have defiled the public image of parliament