UK

Rain (AM and PM) 7° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Boris Johnson dismisses £250,000-a-year Telegraph column as 'chickenfeed'

PA

London Mayor Boris Johnson dismissed the £250,000-a-year he earns from a second job as "chicken feed".

Mr Johnson also insisted it was "wholly reasonable" for him to write newspaper columns on the side because he did them "very fast".

The comments risk infuriating millions of Londoners struggling to make ends meet amid the economic downturn.

And they are unlikely to please David Cameron, who has ordered his shadow cabinet to give up extra work in the run-up to the general election to show their "commitment".

Mr Johnson, who is paid nearly £140,000 for his day job, was quizzed over his lucrative contract with the Daily Telegraph during an interview for the BBC's HARDTalk programme.

He responded: "It's chicken feed."

Pressed on whether voters would agree with that description, the mayor said he was being "frivolous".

But he went on: "I happen to write extremely fast. I don't see why on a Sunday morning I shouldn't knock off an article, if someone wants to pay me for that article then that's their lookout and of course I make a substantial donation to charity.

"Maybe that money shouldn't go to charity, maybe you'd rather I didn't make those contributions to charity. It seems to me to be a wholly reasonable thing to do."

Mr Johnson said: "I think that frankly there's absolutely no reason at all why I should not, on a Sunday morning before I do whatever else I need to do on a Sunday morning, should not knock off an article as a way of relaxation."

Mr Johnson decided to continue with his columns for the Telegraph after being elected last year, but donates £50,000 from his annual fee to charities.

Asked whether Mr Cameron approved of his extra work, the mayor seemed oblivious to the instructions issued by his party leader.

"Well I'm not a member of his shadow cabinet and I'd like to see what the detail of that is," he said.

Labour's deputy leader on the London Assembly, John Biggs, said: "Londoners struggling through the recession will be astounded that their Mayor is so out of touch with reality.

"A quarter of a million pounds may be chicken-feed to him but the overwhelming majority of people in the capital can only dream of earnings like that.

"How can we have any faith in a Mayor who believes earning more than 10 times the majority of those whose interests he is supposed to represent amounts to nothing more than chicken-feed?"

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

humourless twats
[info]joss75321 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 01:00 pm (UTC)
Shame nobody can make a joke without a bunch of idiots pretending to get their knickers in a twist, or a bunch of jealous journalists writing articles with misleading headlines like this one.
Re: humourless twats
[info]foundlostgirl wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 01:37 pm (UTC)
Perhaps people who are struggling on or below the breadline, not knowing if they can pay the rent might not be able to see the funny side. Does that make them humourless twats?
Positively shocking!
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 01:25 pm (UTC)
250,000 for a mornings relaxation...unbelievable...why do the Telegraph pay this much? Utterly shocked!
And another one!
[info]kbo_1 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 01:39 pm (UTC)
Yes: he has done it again. 250,000 of the best (pounds) and it is still fit enough only for the chicken! Is this frivolity appropriate in this straightened times (or any other times)? Jobs falling off the wall like the famous green bottles. Yes green bottles: Mr Johnson and his boss, Mr Cameron make a reasonable point of being green. Maybe Boris should be made to donate the whole of the 250,000 Pounds earning towards a green initiative: The elimination of faux pas from any of Mr Johnson's utterances. Then again 250,000 Pounds will not be enough!
[info]dexter_cobb wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 02:05 pm (UTC)
I happened to be up a 4am this morning when this aired, and he was indeed being frivilous as a response to some extremely stiff questioning. Clearly this piece was written by legendary journalist Phil Space
Boreis
[info]gollymolly44 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)
Ten quid or a packet of chicken feed would be ample payment for the boring, "undergrad" stuff this clown writes. What a fine example he sets. Can we please have a grown-up person for mayor next time?
If the Telegraph
[info]bleedingekk wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 02:33 pm (UTC)
thinks his contributions to its newspaper are that good then good on you Boris. No harm in earning a tidy packet; better than claiming expenses from the tax-payers purse. Must be bloody good stuff he's scribbling down to be paid such an unbelievable amount or are the reat of us just rediculously underpaid? Probably the latter.
chicken feed for some, pure gold for others.
[info]ivydot wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 03:00 pm (UTC)
It was an unfortunate turn of phrase because there are many people, myself included, who would consider it pure gold to earn what Boris call 'chicken-feed'. Still, I see no problem with him writing a column and being mayor. Writing a column is hardly a very time-consuming job.
Dumb and dim.
[info]fulkehunke wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 03:12 pm (UTC)
Nearly 10 times the national average wage is chicken feed, what is it with these rich public school boys and birds. Duck houses, Moats and now chicken feed. This buffoon is giving Gideon (George) Osborne a run in for Prize Turkey.
Chickenfeed?
[info]imperfidious wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 03:33 pm (UTC)
Son of a bitch!

What's the odds the charity donation is offset nicely in his tax bill?

You're not funny Boris - you're fat!
Costs!!
[info]barncactus wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 03:35 pm (UTC)
No wonder papers keep increasing their prices!!
The arrogance of it.
[info]kgd1966 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 03:57 pm (UTC)
I must be a "humourless twat", then, joss75321.

I'd like to see this grinning oaf get by on minimum wage or live on benefits, which is the fate of many millions in this grotty, bankrupt hole of a country.

"Chickenfeed?" To write a few lines of bollocks for a newspaper and receive a quarter of a million pounds a year for his "efforts"?

He has encapsulated perfectly why I - and rapidly growing numbers of the long-suffering British - utterly loathe the entire political class.
Maybe
[info]tim_bee wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 04:08 pm (UTC)
Maybe he is getting money from some other source that people are not aware of. I would expect the newpapers to look into this.
"Maybe" you will "expect"
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 04:19 pm (UTC)
in vain. You don't seriously think that snout editors of dootiful mass meeja organs will "look into" the 'extra-curricular' incomes of fellow travelling snouts just because they are pols - do you?
among the ranks of quisling snouts it is
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 04:15 pm (UTC)
"chickenfeed"
Johnson needs a little tact.
[info]royperestrelo wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 04:23 pm (UTC)
I can see that Boris Johnson has a air of wit about him and this is a way of him expressing himself, but for someone who gets paid incredibly handsomly for his work in writing - one thing he can do is learn a little bit of tact when expressing his opinions.

There are so many working in public sector organisations who will never reach such grand salaries in their public sector roles and those are the ones he needs to show lamentable respect.

Yes writing pays well, but above all use the gift wisely.....
Good for you Boris
[info]the_kasou wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 04:39 pm (UTC)
And why not. better than those just pacing till they are trown out and can claim a very neat payoff and pension having done nothing useful for 12 years other than back B'Liar and McBruin.
Re: Good for you Boris
[info]shakras wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 04:59 pm (UTC)
In other words, you hold that it is an acceptable norm, that the legitimate aim of public office holders, in the banana republic of Britain, is personal financial gain
Re: Good for you Boris
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 05:00 pm (UTC)
kasou, you're a strange looking one...was the photo taken in police custody?...are you related to Joseph Fritzel?....back to the bunker...off you go...
JEALOUSY
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 05:07 pm (UTC)
If Boris Johnson can get big bucks for writing an article. Good luck to him. If all the little minded jealous no-hopers could do the same they would soon pocket the money. In the UK if you are successful everybody hates you. If you are totally useless it makes the sad and useless happy (except for Gordon Brown), of course
Re: JEALOUSY - the prob with that argument is that
[info]shakras wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
the "big bucks" for 'writing' "an article" terrible in its dreariness and platitudinous dribbling of the blindingly obvious, is evidently a reward (to a public office holder) for something else
Re: JEALOUSY
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 05:39 pm (UTC)
georgy-babe, if you're given the privilege of holding high office in a City of both rich and poor, don't insult the people who voted for you. Very simple...even an idiot could work it out...but then along came you.....
Re: JEALOUSY
[info]georgesign wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 06:07 pm (UTC)
As I said. Answered by jealous no-hopers.
Re: JEALOUSY
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 06:30 pm (UTC)
..in your dreams poor boy...just stay off the wet ones....nah...don't bother...suits your character...
Clucking ridiculous
[info]prof_use wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 06:46 pm (UTC)
I can't imagine John Prescott ever having to have dealt with such a problem. If Boris can earn money in his spare time why not? It's a typical silly comment though and Boris doesn't do himself favours does he?

But there again he's not spending a fortune on party political PR like the previous one did. Remember the paper strewn across London, all those trees cut down so that absolute clap trap saying how wonderful a job was being done by the previous administration. If that's the only thing Boris is doing wrong and all you can talk about is one of his silly comments he really must be doing a very good job.

I think Boris has been very restrained, he has seen some horrendous money wasting schemes and some almost criminal uses of tax payers money and he has quietly shut them down with no big political statements. Actually he has almost been statesman like and certainly seems to have been a good mayor so far but thankfully he keeps coming out with the occasional Boris clanger to remind us he is human. And he doesn't spurt that politicospeak that we used to suffer hearing.

At the moment I find him very refreshing. He's concentrating on the job more than the previous mayor did and maybe he should actually talk more about some of the previous regime's howlers and what he has done with the money instead. Whilst he still can make a balls up of his term in office the benchmark was not really too high. i actually voted for KL the first time round but it was time for a change.

Who would want Gordon Brown to pen a column in their spare time, maybe a Journal of Psychiatry? Which cabinet Minister's columns would you like to read? Hopefully soon they will have the time to write them.
Re: Clucking ridiculous
[info]fulkehunke wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 08:11 pm (UTC)
"Who would want Gordon Brown to pen a column in their spare time, maybe a Journal of Psychiatry?"
Gordon Brown has written a number of books, Britain's everyday heroes being one, I don't think Boris Gump was in it, I think he was in rich and clueless, or was it rich and strange. It's not the money that's the issue, it's the reasoning. He has a very difficult job to do yet he admits he takes time, all be it very little time, to pen tripe even he considers the ramblings of a bumbling idiot. If he gets paid to do that? what other part of his character is up for auction?. It would appear if you have a spare 250grand you can buy some influence.....???...or can you...?...I would assume the Telegraph are re-negotiating his salary given the fact he writes his plop while doing one.
I like him
[info]redwaz wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 08:46 pm (UTC)
Dont knock someone that talks the talk. I like his straight talking stuff. I get up at 5am every morning and drive a truck, good luck to the bloke. I should have tried harder at school.

Always have the attitude that dont knock people down to your level, move up to theirs.

God I hate this countrys knockem off the perch shit.
Re: Half phraser
[info]kodak321 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 09:09 pm (UTC)
redwaz, he talks the talk...but can he walk the walk?...keep driving....
[info]cm999 wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 09:44 pm (UTC)
what does it say about our society that it puts such a high value on a few words written up quickly. THis will no doubt be followed soon by the Torygraph or Boris telling us all how we need to sacrifice this that and the other because of the state of the economy
Simple, Stop Buying The Telegraph.
[info]proximaking wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 10:01 pm (UTC)
Simple solution, I won't be buying the Telegraph again. I object to such obnoxious nonces as Johnson taking the piss out of me.
chicen farmer
[info]rexxxxxxxx wrote:
Tuesday, 14 July 2009 at 10:44 pm (UTC)
250000 will feed 4 million chickens for a day unless boris eats any in which case the law of deminishing returns aplies
Chickenfeed ?
[info]rockcliffe wrote:
Wednesday, 15 July 2009 at 03:01 pm (UTC)


Cluck, cluck, cluck !

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date