Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Sharing of crime-fighting data ‘slower and clunky’ under Brexit deal, former national security adviser warns

Even limited agreement reached will be ripped up if UK pulls out of the European Convention on Human Rights 

Rob Merrick
Deputy Political Editor
Saturday 26 December 2020 14:05 GMT
Comments
Boris Johnson announces historic Brexit trade deal with EU

The sharing of vital crime-fighting data will be “slower and more clunky” under Boris Johnson’s Brexit deal, a former national security adviser has warned.

And even the limited agreement reached with the EU will be ripped up if the UK ever pulls out of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the full document reveals.

Peter Ricketts, the security chief under David Cameron, said the deal was “better than I had feared”, allowing the exchange of fingerprints, DNA and vehicle registration data to continue.

But he warned that “cooperation will be still be slower/more clunky than now” and raised the alarm over the loss of real-time access to the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS).

Similarly, the UK will be shut out of the SIS II database, which raises alerts over suspected terrorists and organised criminals, and will have to rely on slower information-sharing after requests.

The UK will also lose the ability to initiate joint investigations through Europol and Eurojust, regressing to “a more arms-length role in these two bodies where UK has been a leader”, Lord Ricketts said.

And, with the loss of the European Arrest Warrant, EU states will no longer have to extradite their nationals to the UK, although they will be obliged to investigate suspects domestically.

Lord Ricketts, who chairs the Lords committee that has been investigating loss of law enforcement and security capability, said: “It all depends on the commission making a positive data adequacy ruling within 4-month window.

“And all this cooperation can be suspended if UK fails to respect fundamental rights as set out in the ECHR.” 

The convention, incorporated into UK law by Labour’s 1998 Human Rights Act, has been a target of many Conservatives for a long time.

This month, ministers unveiled plans to “opt out” of parts of it in order to speed up deportations of asylum seekers, and to protect British troops serving overseas from legal action.

Human rights claims where judges have supposedly “overreached” their powers will be targeted.

The 1,255-page text of the Brexit deal, published on Saturday, says the security aspects of it would be “terminated on account of the United Kingdom or a member state having denounced the European Convention on Human Rights”.

Despite Lord Ricketts’ warnings, the home secretary, Priti Patel, insisted that “the UK will continue to be one of the safest countries in the world”.

"I'm immensely proud of the comprehensive package of capabilities we've agreed with the EU,” she said.

“It means both sides have effective tools to tackle serious crime and terrorism, protecting the public and bringing criminals to justice.

“But we will also seize this historic opportunity to make the UK safer and more secure through firmer and fairer border controls.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in