Brown snubs Dannatt in talks on reinforcements for Afghanistan
Downing Street believes Army chief is using crisis in war zone to score political points against the Government
Gordon Brown is preparing to send more helicopters and military hardware to Afghanistan following public protests over lack of resources from defence chiefs.
Plans to reinforce the beleaguered British force have been drawn up after Downing Street consulted senior military commanders. But in a dramatic indication of the level of friction between the Government and the head of the Army, Downing Street excluded General Sir Richard Dannatt, Chief of the General Staff, from the negotiations.
Ministers are also making clear that the 700 additional troops deployed to Helmand to reinforce the "surge" against the Taliban will remain for the foreseeable future. Additional explosives officers are also expected to be sent to counter roadside bombs and mines. At the same time special forces units which have been withdrawn from Iraq are also due to be sent on to Afghanistan.
The moves came as the latest member of the British forces to die in Afghanistan was named last night as Rifleman Aminiasi Toge, 27, of 2nd Battalion The Rifles. He died in a roadside explosion while on a foot patrol on attachment to a Danish battalion in Helmand and was the 16th British victim in two weeks.
His death on Thursday took the number of UK troops who have died in Afghanistan since the start of operations in October 2001 to 185, six more than the total death toll in the Iraq war.
Rifleman Toge, 27, was born in Suva, Fiji, and joined the British Army in 2007. His commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel Rob Thompson, said "He was one of 35 heroic Fijians in this battalion who add huge value, character and noise to all my companies across Helmand. Rifleman Toge was one of the toughest riflemen under my command and he was adored – heart-breakingly so – by all who had the privilege to encounter him. We have lost a courageous man of great stature – there was no truer moral compass in the Battle Group."
As the action to improve security ahead of the Afghan elections next month continued, Sir Richard used a radio interview to issue a "shopping list" of demands to the Government. It included more helicopters and extra unmanned surveillance drones, as well as more "boots on the ground".
Air Chief Marshal Sir Jock Stirrup, the Chief of the Defence Staff, also delivered a rebuke to the Prime Minister by contradicting his insistence that no British soldier had died because of the helicopter shortage. The decision of Sir Richard, who has just come back from Helmand, to go public with his concerns over the support for Operation Panther's Claw was an extraordinary snub to the Prime Minister. The two men are believed to have not spoken since the general returned from Afghanistan.
Sir Richard said the succession of deaths from roadside bombs – so-called improvised explosive devices (IEDs) – could undermine public support for Britain's presence in Helmand. He said he would present a "shopping list" of demands to ministers for bolstering the campaign. He said the extra money could come either from the Treasury or from other parts of the Ministry of Defence budget.
Sir Richard, who retires next month, said: "We have really got to win this offensive counter–IED campaign. What do I mean? I mean we have got to be able to see what the Taliban are doing better – overhead surveillance, we have a certain amount of capability. We have got to be able to target where they are laying these things, which means by technical means we have got to be able to do it." He added that the international forces had to have "sufficient people on the ground" so they could prevent the Taliban planting mines.
The general won the support of Sir Jock Stirrup, who met the Prime Minister in Downing Street yesterday. Sir Jock said he was "busting a gut" to draft as many helicopters as possible into service, admitting that lack of aircover could put put foot-soldiers at risk. He said: "In this situation where you have lots of improvised explosive devices, the more you can increase your tactical flexibility by moving people by helicopters then the more unpredictable your movements become to the enemy. Therefore it is quite patently the case that you could save casualties by doing that."
In the face of the demands, Downing Street signalled that extra resources would be found for the Afghanistan operation. A spokesman said General Dannatt's recommendations would be examined "very seriously".
Lord Mandelson, the First Minister, also promised: "[British troops] will not go without whatever they need to carry out their very important operations in Afghanistan."
Senior officials in Downing Street and the Foreign Office are said to be deeply upset that Sir Richard had used his valedictory visit to the battlefield to "make political points" about the lack of troops and helicopters.
Senior defence and diplomatic sources say that various options to provide additional troops and aircraft for the Helmand mission were already under consideration before General Dannatt's highly publicised trip.
No final decision would be made, however, until the new American commander of Nato forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, presents his military blueprint for the Afghan campaign in the next two months.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited


Comments
In better times and in a less democratic country I fear he may have found himself seeking asylum in another country. Wake up Brown and Mandleson before it is too late.
How can he ignore the most senior British soldier at the very time when British troops in Afghanistan are dying on a daily basis? What message is he sending to British troops by refusing to deal with General Dannant?
His lack of grace and petulant behaviour will be remembered long after his departure from Downing Street.
it is all eastasia/eurasia stuff, as per orwell.
I seem to recall well over a hundred Britons were killed in the World Trade Center on 9/11 by Al Qaida murderers. Al Qaida had bases in Afghanistan approved of by their allies, the Taleban who then ruled the country.
Hence, we are now fighting in Afghanistan.
I am now convince, more than ever, that our PM is not fit to lead our country. Never in the history of Government has the UK had such a dysfunctional cretin in charge. He is pathalogically unfit for his duties.
Residence of the Uk, benefits etc. It took decades for the Ghurkhas to get treated like one of our own so what's the score with Fijians?
As for the general and his spat with Brown there's alot of ego at stake here, both appear to have excesses of it. Okay let's get it down to real targets. So General when will you win this war? Any year will do. And PM just how much are you prepared to commit the people of Britain to pay for it? And when. Should be an easy one for such a good ex chancellor eh!
until the Taliban has been defeated. If this is true and the streets of this country will run red with the
blood of of the UK populace if it is not won. Why the hesitance to spend the funds required to win this war. In other conflicts expense was not a consideration in regards to obtaining military equipment. Rules and regulations regarding military procurement were thrown to the wind. Military equipment was purchased from other countries regardless of the expense if unavailable. from UK sources. If the Taliban is as big threat as the government claimed this week it must come up with the funds to win it. The government has spent hundreds of billions to save the banks, why not the same to keep the nation safe from terrorist attack.
Superpowers go to Afghanistan to get humbled. This war is not winnable. Time is on their side.
Dannatt is to be applauded for standing up for his troops - that's part of his job and that is what he is doing.
I am upset at these nameless faceless officials for the way in which they are undermining public support for the actions in Afghanistan. The majority of the public understand and support the rationale for our being there as part of an international force. With Downing Street's response to the treatment of retired Gurkhas and now the response to requests for additional resources you have to ask yourself what political planet these officials live on. Oh, and for a bonus, it can't do us much good in our attempts to persuade our international partners to stump up more for the campaign.
Did you all know? blair left me with so many problems and since than I was trying to find any good things he done, but guess what? there was nothing, absolutely nothing. But don't worry folks have no fear I'm here.
HS UK
Consider seriously the fact that for 11 or so years Russia threw in over 500,000 soldiers never less than 100,000 at the time and finally left Afghanistan with their tail between their legs with 15,000 body bags. Someone somewhere sometime please tell Brown and McChrystal that and make certain they are listening and not dozing off. Talk about lions lead by political donkeys.....
Whilst they are at it tell these idiots that the root of world terror is NOT in Af. it's next door in Pakistan where all military and diplomatic efforts should be directed or is Pakistan 'untouchable?'
'Threat to the streets of Britain?' - rubbish and pure nulab. spin, the traffic is far far more dangerous.
Who are these 47% who approve of this war as per some poll or other? I suspect it was politically motivated by the Grauniad (what's new?) I speak to innumerable people online and face to face and I haven't yet met one of the 47%. What is going on here sending kids to die in a drug and corruption ridden hellhole to support - what? American oil pipeline interests and the price of Heroin. What a sick world we live in whilst listening to the daily dose of nuliebour spin.
Brown who really should not have been let out of uni has an assumed knowledge about everything and little real knowledge of anything.
Shame we cant put him on the front line with a target on his back
The public have every right to ask just why we are in Afghanistan. But the important fact is this government put us there and our service men and women are fighting a war so they need every ounce of support available. Dear Leader, Brown knows only left wing politics. He rants on about Britishness yet fails to support the very people who fight to maintain this Britishness and are fine examples of it.
Frankly Brown's reaction to questioning by James Arbuthnot at the liaison committee was a disgrace. The man cannot answer a straight question with a straight answer then wonders why he is branded a complete liar. How can we stand another ten months of him?
expecting to see a bigger percentage of , " Don't knows "
It must be difficult for the military, when alot of the goals seem blurred. If it is a phoney
war, at some time the military either will know or know some time in the future. If they
feel they've been , " sold out " ......
What then ?