UK

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 9° London Hi 9°C / Lo 7°C

Charities forced to axe thousands of jobs

Voluntary sector feels crunch as income from donations and bequests falls

By Nigel Morris, Deputy Political Editor

Jenny Willott: 'Workload of charities is soaring in the recession'

UPPA/ Photoshot

Jenny Willott: 'Workload of charities is soaring in the recession'

Charities are axeing thousands of jobs to cope with a collapse in donations as the recession deepens.

After years of expansion, the voluntary sector is laying off staff, putting recruitment on hold and scaling back "non-essential" services.

Earnings from investments have also fallen following cuts in interest rates. The value of major bequests has dropped because of tumbling property prices. The redundancies come as charities face greater pressure to help people who have lost their jobs and homes during the economic crisis.

Charities employed just over 500,000 staff in 2000 and the total rose to 624,000 at the end of 2004 and 724,000 last autumn. But new official figures show the number suddenly dropped in the last three months of 2008 to 716,000, the first fall on record for a decade. Voluntary organisations say the trend accelerated in the New Year.

Jenny Willott, the Liberal Democrat Cabinet Office spokeswoman, told The Independent: "These are the first signs that recession-hit charities are being forced to shed jobs just to stay afloat.

"The workload of charities is soaring as the recession pushes more and more people into unemployment and poverty. But at the same time, charitable donations are dropping." Ms Willott, who obtained the figures, added: "Charities are a vital source of support for the most vulnerable people during the recession. If charities fail, we lose yet more jobs as well as losing vital support for the most vulnerable in society."

The National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) said yesterday that a survey of charity leaders showed one-fifth planned to cut staff numbers.

A spokesman for the NSPCC, which has cut 129 jobs from its workforce of 2,300, said: "It is becoming more difficult to recruit new donors and to upgrade existing supporters. We are also noticing that some individuals and organisations can no longer afford to give as much."

Alan Gosschalk, director of fundraising for the housing charity Shelter, said it had made 20 of its 820 employees redundant. "The economic crisis has meant a fall in income from legacies and corporate supporters," he said, "while donations from individuals have remained steady over the past year."

BEN, a charity supporting past and present motor industry workers, is drawing up plans to trim its 450-strong workforce. It has been hit because it relies mainly on support from the motor industry which is facing its worst slump in sales for a generation.

A spokeswoman said: "Calls from people needing help are going through the roof, but donations are going down. Our income is down around 10 per cent and we expect it to fall further."

Charities working overseas have been hit by the falling value of the pound. Oxfam UK suggested it may cut about 50 posts, although the figure remained "fluid".

The NCVO survey discovered that 50 per cent of charity leaders feared their organisation's financial situation would deteriorate over the next year. However, reflecting the social pressures of the recession, 48 per cent said they planned to expand services for the vulnerable.

Among the worst hit have been medium-sized charities which lack the name recognition of larger organisations, but are too big to survive on the generosity of a few philanthropists.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

How much is the admistrative overhead?
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 07:43 am (UTC)
Just curious - How mush of my donation is actually spent on the end need? I read somewhere that the amount is less than 20% of the donation - anyone able to confirm this value? I am thinking of giving direct from now on - straight to the man who needs a drink. At leat he will see an 80% increase in his 'support'
Re: How much is the admistrative overhead?
[info]huntingdon1701 wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 09:06 am (UTC)
You've got the figures reversed and out of balance. Each charity varies but at least 80% of the donation should go to the cause and for many charities it is 90 or even 95%.

Charities have to publish their accounts which will tell you the precise amount spent on admin - the charity commission has a website search facility so you can check up on any charity you are considering donating to.
Re: How much is the admistrative overhead?
[info]sportingmac wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 09:32 am (UTC)
Thank you for that Huntingdon - I followed up on a few interesting websites - very interesting indeed. Seems that these organisations run a very tight business. I feel better informed now.
Cutting back non essential services
[info]peterwarrender wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 08:37 am (UTC)
Why are charities paying for any non essential services. Over the last ten years I have seen charities spending millions on buying and upgrading properties in prime positions on the high St. They are selling new goods in direct competition with other shops but are getting heavily subsidised business rates. They used to be selling goods to people on low incomes. The stock was given to them for free.
Staff are all volunteers. The charities should be more accountable for their budgets. If they sell new goods they are a business and should pay full business rates and taxed on their income. Just like all the rest of the struggling small businesses all over the country.
[info]goat_gruff wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 10:17 am (UTC)
Strange how charities always seem to have the longest ads on TV
[info]dissident05 wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 11:52 am (UTC)
I think you'll find that most adverts run by charities are "donated" by other companies. That said, certain large charities (e.g. NSPCC and Oxfam) spend a vast amount on their adverts - but it does bring the donations in as this world is populated by morons who need their information to be spoonfed by the gogglebox!

the best course of action is to choose a charity with whom you have a sympathy for (for example, if a relative died of a lung disease, choose the British Lung Foundation, if a friend or relative were helped through cancer by a Macmillan nurse, choose Macmillan). They all need our help and the mercenary and cynical views of the posters on this site should not be spread.
Another concern
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 12:51 pm (UTC)
How much are charities seen by the government as ways to avoid shelling out for things that they should be more responsible for?
Charities
[info]changechange2 wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 02:24 pm (UTC)

Maybe we can then get some sincere real volunteers, people who do not make a living on the backs of the sick and poor. I know personally of a lot of reired military officers who do these jobs and can enjoy several overseas holidays each year and large expensive mansions to live in. Some of these charities take over 30% for administration fees. I have stopped giving to registered charities for some time; I give to individuals and although I do not get any tax advantages, at least I can see what good my money is doing. Have you noticed the increased expensive glossy brochures they send you with all kinds of address stickers; I have boxes and boxes of them even though I have not given to these people for years; some administration. Nevertheless the large corporations need this charitable donation on their income tax for relief.
Re: Charities
[info]tjb2376 wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 03:43 pm (UTC)
changechange2 - the only time a charity is likely to take over 30% for admin fees would be when they are seriously investing in their infrastructure, which is almost certainly to enable them to increase their capacity to fundraise, and would only be a short time thing. as huntingdon1701 rightly said earlier in this thread, charities have to be transparent - their accounts are available to anyone online. insincere, corrupt people in the charity sector are a minute minority. you don't seem to have any real, solid evidence to support your distrust of these organisations, only nebulous references to 'reired (sic) military officers' who you suggest are raking it in, although obviously it's your prerogative to refuse to support charities if you wish. the vast majority of people working in charities, as i do, are there to help the needy, not to 'make a living on the backs of the sick and poor', as you very cynically put it.
CHARITY
[info]zanulabour wrote:
Thursday, 30 April 2009 at 09:23 pm (UTC)
Why is there is no such thing as charity ? because there is always some greedy B$$TARD making a fortune out of it

Most popular in UK News



Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date