Davis forces by-election over 'erosion of freedoms'
Thursday, 12 June 2008
The shadow home secretary David Davis shocked Westminster today by announcing that he was resigning as an MP to "take a stand" against the Government's 42-day terror detention plan.
He said he was forcing a by-election to protest against the "insidious" erosion of civil liberties in Britain.
In his statement, Mr Davis said that until last night he believed Parliament was engaged in a "noble endeavour".
"I will argue in this by-election against the slow strangulation of fundamental British freedoms by this government," he added.
Mr Davis spearheaded the Conservatives' failed bid to defeat the Government over extending detention without charge, which caused disquiet among some Tory MPs.
As the resignation drama unfolded in Westminster, a Lib Dem spokeswoman confirmed the party would not be fielding a candidate in the resulting Howden and Haltemprice by-election - giving Mr Davis a clear run against a Labour candidate.
Mr Cameron, who promoted the shadow attorney general Dominic Grieve to take over from Mr Davis, described Mr Davis's decision as "courageous" and "wished him well", but insisted he had to have a "permanent" shadow cabinet.
"I wish David Davis well in his by-election campaign. I know the Conservatives - including me - will want to go and support him," Mr Cameron told reporters. "But my responsibility at all times is (to have) that strong permanent team ready for government."
Mr Davis's local party fully backed his decision, its chairman Duncan Gilmour said.
"David discussed early in the week what he would do if the result went against us last night. David is a man of principle and we fully back him," he told the Press Association.
Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said: "David Davis's decision to resign his seat and fight a by-election over the issue of 42 days is a dramatic move. I am grateful to him for having informed me following the vote of his intention to take this step.
"The Liberal Democrats have consistently opposed this unnecessary and illiberal proposal which poses a threat so serious to British liberties that it transcends party politics.
"I have therefore decided, after consultation with the party nationally and locally, that we will not stand a candidate at the forthcoming by-election which will be contested by David Davis solely on this issue.
"The Liberal Democrats will of course fight the Haltemprice and Howden seat as vigorously as ever at the next General Election."
The Lib Dems had targeted the seat in 2005 as part of its ill-fated "decapitation" strategy to unseat key Tory figures but Mr Davis was re-elected with a 5,116 majority.
The former home secretary David Blunkett dismissed the resignation as a "childish and immature" publicity stunt and urged his Labour party not to use public money to field a candidate in the by-election.
"David Davis's behaviour is a pure piece of political theatre, even more bizarre than John Major resigning as leader of the Tory Party in order to stand again against his own colleagues," he said.
"It is my view that neither the Labour Party nor the Liberal Democrats should give him the egotistical satisfaction of a contest in which he costs the public purse, as well as political parties, substantial sums of money to make exactly the same point that he's already been putting very strongly as shadow home secretary."
The communities secretary Hazel Blears said: "The Tories are plainly in disarray and confusion over the serious issue of national security."
Aides to Mr Davis had indicated that last night's vote was "do or die", and he had staked a great deal of his credibility on the outcome.
Privately Mr Davis has accepted that many on the Tory benches were uncomfortable about opposing tough law and order measures.
However, he is seen as one of the Shadow Cabinet's best operators, and has claimed the scalps of a succession of Home Secretaries.
His popularity among the Conservative grass roots was demonstrated when he came runner-up to David Cameron for the party leadership in 2005.
Mr Davis worked very closely with pressure group Liberty in mounting opposition to the proposals.
Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti said: "Last night's debate, and the brave Labour rebels in particular, showed that democrats from across the spectrum care passionately about rights and freedoms.
"MPs of all parties hold courage and conviction about these values and few more so than David Davis."
She said the 42-day policy was a "divisive and counter-productive folly and not the first of its kind".
"Liberty and security can go hand in hand; we don't defeat terrorism by bowing to it."
The Tory MP for Spelthorne, David Wilshire, said: "I am saddened that a good friend feels compelled to take such a drastic step, but I understand how strongly he feels about this abuse of human rights and the rule of law and I respect him for putting his beliefs before his personal interests.
"I sincerely hope we will be able to welcome him back soon."

Comments
67 Comments
Well done David Davis for being an honorable and principled man we need more like you Congratulations on taking a stand on 42 days and good luck, I,m sure most of the nation are behind you. We the public see through the labour party who treat us with contempt. Their moto sems to be, do as we say - not as we do, enough is enough
Good luck
Posted by Mrs Kate Johnson | 16.06.08, 21:03 GMT
Spot on David Davies, I agreed with every word of his resignation speech. All these curtailments of civil liberties may seem a reasonable respose to a terrorist threat but who knows how they may be used in the future? if the Tory party gets off the fence and enthusiastically backs Davies on this one I may just vote Conservative for the first time in my life.
Posted by l.Robinson | 13.06.08, 17:40 GMT
I agree with David Davies stand on the erosion of our liberties. I too have been concerned about the all powerful state interfering in all aspects of our life. Every time I have tried to discuss this with other people, they seem completely unconcerned. I think we are sleepwalking into a totalitarian state. The governments argument seems to be, "we will protect you from terrorists" give us the power to do this. "We will protect you from illegal immigrants" but you have to have an ID card. "We will protect you from fraud" but we have to know all your financial details etc. These all seem worthy and plausible goals, BUT I always put myself in the place of an innocent accused. How would I prove I was not a terrorist if accused? How would I know what information is on my ID card? Could I correct it if wrong?
My question is "Why don't the governement trust their citizens?" Do I want to live in a country where the governing elite treat me like some sort of bacteria?
Posted by Martin H | 13.06.08, 08:32 GMT
E P Wiggett, this is not about parties; it's about one MP deciding to stand up for freedoms. Not all you said about the erosion of freedoms under Thatcher is true, although that is another matter entirely. Can't you be happy that someone is risking their career to try to draw a line in the sand and maybe recover some of our freedoms?
Posted by Tony Wedale | 13.06.08, 00:07 GMT
Well Well done David Davis. I applaud you for standing up for the truth and doing the right thing. But one resignation out of 600 is a poor show for this honourable House.
Tizab
Posted by Tizab | 12.06.08, 23:40 GMT
What an extraordinary man David Davis is. Here is a man who is prepared to stand up and make himself counted. I hope he stands for re-election again becasue he will undoubtedly win the seat and at the same time reinforce his status.
Posted by Weaver | 12.06.08, 23:39 GMT
Well Well done David Davis. I applaud you for standing up for the truth and doing the right thing. But one resignation out of 600 is a poor show for this honourable House.
Tizab
Posted by Tizab | 12.06.08, 23:37 GMT
A Politician following his conscience well done!
We "are" sleep walking into a Police state.
He is saying what we all know and no other Politician
had the guts to say.
I do hope it's genuine in which case he deserves all our
support .
Standing up for Democracy is the right thing to do because
its in danger now.
We must say no to BIG GOVERNEMENT .
He did!
Well played sir!
Posted by Colin | 12.06.08, 23:34 GMT
A MAN WHO HAS ACTED AS A MAN SHOULD IT IS NOT A RISKY BUISSNESS WELL DONE DAVID DAVIES THE SEEDS
ARE SOWN THIS DARK NIGHT OF SOCALIST/ COMUNISUM
SHOULD BE RESISTED AND AND FOUGHT BY THOSE OF US WHO KNOW BETTER OUR INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY TRUE
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMON SENSE AND RESPONSABILITIES
NEED REBUILDING THERE IS A MUCH BETTER LIFE AHEAD
FOR US ALL AND I HOPE WE CAN NOW GO FOR IT
FIRST TIME SPELLING/PUNTUATION APOLOGYS
Posted by DAVID | 12.06.08, 23:13 GMT
You are all fools!! Do you really think that a party like the Conservatives are really going to protect your civil liberties anymore than the Labour Party? They are all the same! They are all greedy for power and will say anything to get it. Surely you are all old enough to remember the laws introduced under Thatcher which abolished the right to free assembly; the right to join a trade union and strike; the instigation of the Poll Tax, meaning that you had to PAY the charge BEFORE you could VOTE in a GENERAL or local election. And isn't it interesting that the majority of people want the 42 day limit to be crushed but are still happy to brand most Muslim people as potential terrorists? Should I also remind you all that the Conservative Party, under Thatcher, was also willing to impose the same restrictions on Northern Irish "terrorists" in the 1970/80s, imprisoning "suspects" without trial for months? My, you all have such short memories! I wasn't even born then and I can remember it!
Posted by E P Wiggett | 12.06.08, 22:50 GMT
67 Comments